| Revision as of 14:53, 29 January 2020 editJlevi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,438 edits Good going! | Revision as of 18:39, 29 January 2020 edit undoJlevi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,438 edits churnalismNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Hey Yae4! Awesome work here. I don't have time now, but I'll contribute to this page later this week. Two thoughts: 1) A lot of this material could probably go on the main ] page, maybe in a something similar to the "Educational Philosophy" section from the GA-rated ] article. (Maybe research views? Research perspective? Scientific views?) 2) I am a little worried that this page doesn't yet meet ] guidelines, and that it might be in danger of deletion once it goes to mainspace. I've used quite a few of the sources you're referencing right now, and to my knowledge CFAN gets a one-line mention in them. Do you know if any of them is entirely (or mostly) about CFAN? Notability for organizations requires that an organization "has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." You're doing quite a bit of good work, and I just want to make sure it stays up once the draft is done. Finally, please let me know if there's anything in particular you'd appreciate help on for this draft. ] (]) 14:52, 29 January 2020 (UTC) | Hey Yae4! Awesome work here. I don't have time now, but I'll contribute to this page later this week. Two thoughts: 1) A lot of this material could probably go on the main ] page, maybe in a something similar to the "Educational Philosophy" section from the GA-rated ] article. (Maybe research views? Research perspective? Scientific views?) 2) I am a little worried that this page doesn't yet meet ] guidelines, and that it might be in danger of deletion once it goes to mainspace. I've used quite a few of the sources you're referencing right now, and to my knowledge CFAN gets a one-line mention in them. Do you know if any of them is entirely (or mostly) about CFAN? Notability for organizations requires that an organization "has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." You're doing quite a bit of good work, and I just want to make sure it stays up once the draft is done. Finally, please let me know if there's anything in particular you'd appreciate help on for this draft. ] (]) 14:52, 29 January 2020 (UTC) | ||
| : Additionally, I notice a few phys.org sources used. Note that it isn't usually recommended (]). However, it should be relatively easy to find the original versions of the articles. ] (]) 18:39, 29 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:39, 29 January 2020
Hey Yae4! Awesome work here. I don't have time now, but I'll contribute to this page later this week. Two thoughts: 1) A lot of this material could probably go on the main Judith Curry page, maybe in a something similar to the "Educational Philosophy" section from the GA-rated Heather_Knight_(educator) article. (Maybe research views? Research perspective? Scientific views?) 2) I am a little worried that this page doesn't yet meet notability guidelines, and that it might be in danger of deletion once it goes to mainspace. I've used quite a few of the sources you're referencing right now, and to my knowledge CFAN gets a one-line mention in them. Do you know if any of them is entirely (or mostly) about CFAN? Notability for organizations requires that an organization "has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." You're doing quite a bit of good work, and I just want to make sure it stays up once the draft is done. Finally, please let me know if there's anything in particular you'd appreciate help on for this draft. Jlevi (talk) 14:52, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
- Additionally, I notice a few phys.org sources used. Note that it isn't usually recommended (Misplaced Pages:Potentially_unreliable_sources#Science_churnalism_sites). However, it should be relatively easy to find the original versions of the articles. Jlevi (talk) 18:39, 29 January 2020 (UTC)