| Revision as of 16:56, 12 December 2006 editJoshuaZ (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers31,657 edits Regarding your comment on my talk page← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:59, 12 December 2006 edit undoMathchem271828 (talk | contribs)201 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| Sure that'd be great. --] | Sure that'd be great. --] | ||
| == Regarding your comment on my talk page == | |||
| Regarding your comment on my talk page, among other things you may want to read ]. Furthermore where there are few scientists who have those beliefs and whether they should be "FORGIVEN" for them isn't relevant- indeed even keeping them out of article as "forgiveness" would be a violation of ]. ] 16:56, 12 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:59, 12 December 2006
Please help - inclusionism is "absurb" now
Sorry to bother you, but as an things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion here. Kappa 02:52, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Henry F. Schaefer, III
I want to make it clear to any one who might browse my talk page that I had nothing to do with the current status of that page. I tried to put it back to where it was about the science and failed because other users wanted to make it about religion and ID, which obviously aren't science.
Your eforts on the Schaefer page missed me as I was busy doing other things and anyway I am on the other side of the world and do things at different times. I was in the Schaefer group in 1990 on sabbatical and collaborated with him for several years after that. I think I have published 9 papers with him. I respect his science greatly and do not agree with him in any respect on religion. Please e-mail me from my user page and let us talk about him off wiki for a while. It is too late at night here now for more. --Bduke 11:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Sure that'd be great. --mathchem271828