| Revision as of 22:22, 23 February 2020 editFDW777 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users27,732 edits →February 2020← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:03, 24 February 2020 edit undoMr. Vernon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers20,305 edits Warning: Edit warring on Dáil Éireann. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
| This refers to you changing the article to read {{tq|Article 13.2.1 states that "The Dáil Éireann shall be summoned and dissolved by the President on the advice of the Taoiseach"}} when Article 13.2.1 does not include the word "The". ] (]) 22:22, 23 February 2020 (UTC) | This refers to you changing the article to read {{tq|Article 13.2.1 states that "The Dáil Éireann shall be summoned and dissolved by the President on the advice of the Taoiseach"}} when Article 13.2.1 does not include the word "The". ] (]) 22:22, 23 February 2020 (UTC) | ||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ], rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. | |||
| Points to note: | |||
| # '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;''' | |||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> ] (]) 02:03, 24 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider ] for yourself or ] so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
Revision as of 02:03, 24 February 2020
Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
- Contributing to Misplaced Pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- Simplified Manual of Style
You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Misplaced Pages, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
- Create new pages and rename pages
- Edit semi-protected pages
- Upload images
- Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed
Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a minimum number of days and made a minimum number of edits.
If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (178.40.136.239) is used to identify you instead.
I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).
Happy editing! –Gladamas (talk · contribs) 22:31, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
February 2020
Hello, I'm Mr. Vernon. Misplaced Pages is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Naturopathy seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles, as you did to Naturopathy. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. I understand your view, but you need to take it to the Talk page for the article. It would also help if you had sources. We can't take your word for it. Mr. Vernon (talk) 19:37, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Welcome to Misplaced Pages from the Medicine WikiProject!
Welcome to Misplaced Pages from WikiProject Medicine (also known as WPMED).
We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of medical articles here on Misplaced Pages. One of our members has noticed that you are interested in editing medical articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing Misplaced Pages articles are:
- Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on our talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the WPMED talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
- Sourcing of medical and health-related content on Misplaced Pages is guided by our medical sourcing guidelines, commonly referred to as MEDRS. These guidelines typically require recent secondary sources to support information; their application is further explained here. Primary sources (case studies, case reports, research studies) are rarely used, especially if the primary sources are produced by the organisation or individual who is promoting a claim.
- The Misplaced Pages community includes a wide variety of editors with different interests, skills, and knowledge. We all manage to get along through a lot of discussion that happens under the scenes and through the bold, revert, discuss editing cycle. If you encounter any problems, you can discuss them on an article's talk page or post a message on the WPMED talk page.
Feel free to drop a note on my talk page if you have any problems. I wish you all the best on your wiki voyages! Mr. Vernon (talk) 19:38, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
February 2020
Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Naturopathy. This violates Misplaced Pages's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Specifically on "hepar sulph" Mr. Vernon (talk) 19:59, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hi
We may have gotten off to a bad start. Please, before we revert again, come to Talk:Naturopathy and present your case. We build by consensus. Also if you want to add a comment about Hepar sulph, I would not put it into the picture (see WP:LEDE) and make sure it is sourced (see WP:SOURCES.) Does that sound good? --Mr. Vernon (talk) 20:02, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Also, thank you for your good work on List of cancer types. Removing vandalism and fake information from Misplaced Pages is a good thing and everyone appreciates it. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 20:07, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
February 2020
Your recent editing history at Dáil Éireann shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. FDW777 (talk) 22:18, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm FDW777. Your recent edit(s) to the page Dáil Éireann appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.
This refers to you changing the article to read Article 13.2.1 states that "The Dáil Éireann shall be summoned and dissolved by the President on the advice of the Taoiseach"
when Article 13.2.1 does not include the word "The". FDW777 (talk) 22:22, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Dáil Éireann; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:03, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.