| Revision as of 22:11, 29 February 2020 editNaomiAmethyst (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers, Template editors6,271 edits →Weird archive index: Reply.← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:33, 2 March 2020 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,383,626 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/2020/February. (BOT)Next edit → | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
| {{WP:TPS/watched}} | {{WP:TPS/watched}} | ||
| <div style="clear: both;" ></div> | <div style="clear: both;" ></div> | ||
| == ClueBot NG is a pending changes reviewer - why? == | |||
| ClueBot NG is flagged as a pending changes reviewer. But, it have never accepted pending changes (https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Log?type=review&user=ClueBot+NG&page=&wpdate=&tagfilter=&subtype=accept) or unaccepted accepted revisions (https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Log?type=review&user=ClueBot+NG&page=&wpdate=&tagfilter=&subtype=unaccept), so it has never used the rights. Furthermore, looking at the BRFAs I found I don't see any approval to act as a reviewer. The rights were added by {{ping|Cobi|p=}} in 2010 with the summary "+ClueBot's flags." - are these still needed? Thanks, --] (]) 21:57, 22 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :If a editor who is not +PC undoes an edit by another editor, wouldn't that "undo" edit appear a pending? ] (]) 03:36, 23 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::{{ping|DMacks}} no - all autoconfirmed users have autoreview. +PC just allows accepting (or unaccepting) edits by users without autoreview (ip / non-confirmed) ] (]) 03:48, 23 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :::I just applied the same flags that ] had at the time, as ClueBot was being decommissioned and ClueBot NG was replacing it. See for when that right was added to ClueBot. -- ]<sup>(]|]|])</sup> 23:58, 23 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Weird archive index == | == Weird archive index == | ||
Revision as of 05:33, 2 March 2020
| Skip to table of contents |
False positives and false negativesIf you believe that ClueBot NG has mistakenly identified a good edit as vandalism, please follow the directions in the warning it gave or click here. Please do not report it on this talk page. It takes less time to report the case to the correct location, and we can handle it more effectively there.If you believe that ClueBot NG has missed an edit that is vandalism, again do not report it here. ClueBot is unable to catch all vandalism. Just revert the edit and warn the editor. ClueBot NG Links!Report False Positives • Frequently Asked Questions Purpose of this PageThis page is for comments on or questions about the ClueBots.
The current status of ClueBot NG is: Running
The current status of ClueBot III is: Running
Praise should go on the praise page. Barnstars and other awards should go on the awards page.
Use the "new section" button at the top of this page to add a new section. Use the link above each section to edit that section.
This page is automatically archived by ClueBot III.
The ClueBots' owner or someone else who knows the answer to your question will reply on this page.
Template:Archive box collapsible
| ClueBots | |
|---|---|
| ClueBot NG/Anti-vandalism · ClueBot II/ClueBot Script |  |
| ClueBot III/Archive · Talk page for all ClueBots |
 | Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back. |
Weird archive index
I just saw User:ClueBot III/Indices/User talk:Pluma. ClueBot III is doing it, but I don't think this is intended behaviour. Instead of an index of archives it's a list of articles. Huon (talk) 22:43, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
- It's been doing that for years in numerous locations, with no explanation having been provided as to why it does this. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 20:50, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- It's usually due to an incorrect archiveprefix setting. In this case, it's the space between the equals and User talk:Pluma. -- Cobi 22:11, 29 February 2020 (UTC)