| Revision as of 06:08, 4 March 2020 editHasteur (talk | contribs)31,857 edits Keep← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:13, 4 March 2020 edit undoCyberbot I (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors1,716,681 edits Automated comment: AfD was not correctly transcluded. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))Next edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| Subject of article does not appear to meet notability guidelines per ] ] (]) 06:02, 4 March 2020 (UTC) | Subject of article does not appear to meet notability guidelines per ] ] (]) 06:02, 4 March 2020 (UTC) | ||
| :'''Keep''' With respect to {{rto|Mdewman6}}, I suggest you review ] specifically {{tq|The motivation for the crime or the execution of the crime is unusual—or has otherwise been considered noteworthy—such that it is a well-documented historic event. Generally, historic significance is indicated by sustained coverage of the event in reliable secondary sources which persists beyond contemporaneous news coverage and devotes significant attention to the individual's role}}. Further I suggest with attention being focused on the biography as the result of ending up on a certial social media cite this will pass the ] test by the time that this AFD closes. ] (]) 06:08, 4 March 2020 (UTC) | :'''Keep''' With respect to {{rto|Mdewman6}}, I suggest you review ] specifically {{tq|The motivation for the crime or the execution of the crime is unusual—or has otherwise been considered noteworthy—such that it is a well-documented historic event. Generally, historic significance is indicated by sustained coverage of the event in reliable secondary sources which persists beyond contemporaneous news coverage and devotes significant attention to the individual's role}}. Further I suggest with attention being focused on the biography as the result of ending up on a certial social media cite this will pass the ] test by the time that this AFD closes. ] (]) 06:08, 4 March 2020 (UTC) | ||
| *<small>'''Automated comment:''' This AfD was not correctly ] to the log (]). I have transcluded it to ]. —]<small><sub style="margin-left:-13.5ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">]:Online</sub></small> 06:13, 4 March 2020 (UTC)</small><!--Cyberbot I relist--> | |||
Revision as of 06:13, 4 March 2020
William Howard Hughes
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- William Howard Hughes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject of article does not appear to meet notability guidelines per WP:BIO Mdewman6 (talk) 06:02, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep With respect to @Mdewman6:, I suggest you review WP:CRIM specifically
The motivation for the crime or the execution of the crime is unusual—or has otherwise been considered noteworthy—such that it is a well-documented historic event. Generally, historic significance is indicated by sustained coverage of the event in reliable secondary sources which persists beyond contemporaneous news coverage and devotes significant attention to the individual's role
. Further I suggest with attention being focused on the biography as the result of ending up on a certial social media cite this will pass the WP:HEY test by the time that this AFD closes. Hasteur (talk) 06:08, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 March 4. —Talk to my owner:Online 06:13, 4 March 2020 (UTC)