Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Journal of Joan of Arc Studies: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:17, 15 December 2006 editDavidpdx (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,793 edits []← Previous edit Revision as of 20:49, 16 December 2006 edit undoCoredesat (talk | contribs)22,795 edits []: close, deleteNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. --''']]''' 20:49, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}
:{{la|Journal of Joan of Arc Studies}} <includeonly> — (])</includeonly> :{{la|Journal of Joan of Arc Studies}} <includeonly> — (])</includeonly>
This journal's publisher appears to be a vanity press rather than a legitimate academic organization. In addition, according to WorldCat, the journal is not held by any libraries, and as far as I can tell has published only one issue (or perhaps none). The publication doesn't appear to be notable. ] (]) 03:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC) This journal's publisher appears to be a vanity press rather than a legitimate academic organization. In addition, according to WorldCat, the journal is not held by any libraries, and as far as I can tell has published only one issue (or perhaps none). The publication doesn't appear to be notable. ] (]) 03:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Line 12: Line 18:
*'''reluctant delete''' its a small academic society, not a vanity press, but it does not seem to have actually put out much in the way of publication & its websites didnt work. ] 05:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC) *'''reluctant delete''' its a small academic society, not a vanity press, but it does not seem to have actually put out much in the way of publication & its websites didnt work. ] 05:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' ] 09:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC) * '''Delete''' ] 09:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Revision as of 20:49, 16 December 2006

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 20:49, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Journal of Joan of Arc Studies

Journal of Joan of Arc Studies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

This journal's publisher appears to be a vanity press rather than a legitimate academic organization. In addition, according to WorldCat, the journal is not held by any libraries, and as far as I can tell has published only one issue (or perhaps none). The publication doesn't appear to be notable. --Akhilleus (talk) 03:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.