Misplaced Pages

talk:Requests for comment/Psychohistorian: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:37, 15 December 2006 editFourdee (talk | contribs)3,387 edits Hu's Baseless Accusations← Previous edit Revision as of 14:45, 15 December 2006 edit undoPhilKnight (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators125,360 edits ConclusionNext edit →
Line 22: Line 22:


-- ] 14:37, 15 December 2006 (UTC) -- ] 14:37, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

== Conclusion ==

I would agree with the assessment of Psychohistorian, this RfC has demonstrated a consensus supporting his conduct. ] 14:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:45, 15 December 2006

Hu's Baseless Accusations

Hu said:

"Alternatively uses a discredited abuser of NPA warnings (Lukas19/Thulean) as evidence of "multiple" warnings, even after being told this was foolish"

Want to back that up? Lukas19 18:05, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Already done, thank you. Hu 18:48, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

You just gave a link to User:Sugaar 's comment who was blocked for 6 hours for harrassing me. Clearly, your understanding of "done" in this case is hugely sub-standart. Lukas19 20:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


Addhoc

It's funny that User:Addhoc calls us trolls when he himself is a POV troll who has been blocked for it before. It's also funny that he lodged a very similar NPA warning against someone for behavior that Psycho historian nearly precisely duplicates, but apparently anyone who is on the right side of his agenda is free from sin...

"-- No Personal Attacks --
Describing persons who are followers of a specific belief, in this case Matrixism, as kooks is a clear violation of WP:NPA. You have been warned. Addhoc 11:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC)"

He refused on his talk page to give any justification for his snide, rude and apparently baseless "troll" comments on this RfC, and had the nerve to ask me not to post to his talk page - after he saw fit to troll my RfC.

-- Fourdee 14:37, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Conclusion

I would agree with the assessment of Psychohistorian, this RfC has demonstrated a consensus supporting his conduct. Addhoc 14:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)