Revision as of 13:10, 15 March 2020 editMopswade (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,966 edits →March 2020Tag: 2017 wikitext editor← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:33, 15 March 2020 edit undoHzh (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers141,607 edits →March 2020Next edit → | ||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
Forgot to mention, but I was under the presumption that The Economist is a reliable source. Please let me know if this is not the case. ] (]) 13:10, 15 March 2020 (UTC) | Forgot to mention, but I was under the presumption that The Economist is a reliable source. Please let me know if this is not the case. ] (]) 13:10, 15 March 2020 (UTC) | ||
: The Economist did not say what you claimed it says. It did not say it was due to "factual inaccuracies", "controversial", this is something you made up. You edit on US also did not "censor", again you invented that. Your edits suggest that you are deliberately introducing bias into the article. ] (]) 13:33, 15 March 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:33, 15 March 2020
This is Mopswade's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 |
Welcome!
|
Discussion at A
You are invited to join the discussion at A. V2lraXBlZGlhIEFkbWlu (talk) 10:49, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Template:Z48
New message from Mopswade
Hello, Mopswade. You have new messages at Mopswade's talk page.Message added 10:50, 14 March 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
V2lraXBlZGlhIEFkbWlu (talk) 10:50, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Discussion at 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic
You are invited to join the discussion at 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. V2lraXBlZGlhIEFkbWlu (talk) 10:51, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Template:Z48
March 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Your edits also violated the policy on neutral point of view and introduced bias. Hzh (talk) 12:47, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know. As for the information you edited on Li Wenliang, the source I added()did support the information I put in. The source said that Li Wenliang identified the coronavirus in his Wechat as "SARS", and leading to a warning by local police, as "he did not know whether is was actually SARS. He had posted it too fast", and "that was his mistake". Mopswade (talk) 13:05, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Forgot to mention, but I was under the presumption that The Economist is a reliable source. Please let me know if this is not the case. Mopswade (talk) 13:10, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- The Economist did not say what you claimed it says. It did not say it was due to "factual inaccuracies", "controversial", this is something you made up. You edit on US also did not "censor", again you invented that. Your edits suggest that you are deliberately introducing bias into the article. Hzh (talk) 13:33, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- "Li Wenliang died on 7 Februaryth". The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 13 March 2020.