Talk:Ruined orgasm: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 02:04, 21 December 2006 editFT2 (talk \| contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators55,546 edits merged← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:54, 20 January 2007 edit undoTaxwoman (talk \| contribs)895 edits →Merged: RestoredNext edit →
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Merged into ] -- covers very similar territory and repeats similar material. ] <sup><span style="font-style:italic">(] \| ])</span></sup> 02:04, 21 December 2006 (UTC)		Merged into ] -- covers very similar territory and repeats similar material. ] <sup><span style="font-style:italic">(] \| ])</span></sup> 02:04, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
			:I have not previously been monitoring this article, so I didn't know about the merge. Had I known, I would have objected, because ruined orgasm is not the same as erotic sexual denial. I've now restored the article and shall try to improve it. Of course, if anyone still wishes to make it a re-direct, I shall be happy to debate it.--] 21:54, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:54, 20 January 2007

"Some information in this article or section has not been verified and may not be reliable."

pfffft

This is part of a highly private subculture. theres not likely to be written sources. The only sources are to read sexually oriented forums like

http://www.lockmeup.com/cgi-bin/discus/discus.cgi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lincspoacher (talk • contribs)

The threshold for inclusion in Misplaced Pages is verifiability, not truth. If it can't be verified, it shouldn't be on Misplaced Pages. Mdwh 23:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Merged

Merged into Erotic sexual denial -- covers very similar territory and repeats similar material. FT2 02:04, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

I have not previously been monitoring this article, so I didn't know about the merge. Had I known, I would have objected, because ruined orgasm is not the same as erotic sexual denial. I've now restored the article and shall try to improve it. Of course, if anyone still wishes to make it a re-direct, I shall be happy to debate it.--Taxwoman 21:54, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:04, 21 December 2006 editFT2 (talk \| contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators55,546 edits merged← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:54, 20 January 2007 edit undoTaxwoman (talk \| contribs)895 edits →Merged: RestoredNext edit →
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Merged into ] -- covers very similar territory and repeats similar material. ] <sup><span style="font-style:italic">(] \| ])</span></sup> 02:04, 21 December 2006 (UTC)		Merged into ] -- covers very similar territory and repeats similar material. ] <sup><span style="font-style:italic">(] \| ])</span></sup> 02:04, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
			:I have not previously been monitoring this article, so I didn't know about the merge. Had I known, I would have objected, because ruined orgasm is not the same as erotic sexual denial. I've now restored the article and shall try to improve it. Of course, if anyone still wishes to make it a re-direct, I shall be happy to debate it.--] 21:54, 20 January 2007 (UTC)