| Revision as of 18:02, 22 December 2006 editFeloniousMonk (talk | contribs)18,409 edits rv undue weight given to ID view← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:33, 22 December 2006 edit undoTim Smith (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,323 edits added dispute tags made necessary by continued reverting; please engage in constructive editing and discussionNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''''Uncommon Dissent: Intellectuals Who Find Darwinism Unconvincing''''' is a ] anthology edited by ] activist ] in which fifteen intellectuals criticise "]", which they use to refer to the theory of ].<ref>"As I stated earlier, Johnson, Dembski, and their associates have assumed the task of destroying 'Darwinism,' 'evolutionary naturalism,' 'scientific materialism,' 'methodological naturalism,' 'philosophical naturalism,' and other 'isms' they use as synonyms for evolution." Barbara Forrest. March 2000. Quoted in William A. Dembski. May 14 2005</ref><ref>"In his latest Commentary essay on 'Darwinism' - as it is often called by those who do not know much evolutionary biology..." Paul Gross. Commentary Magazine, Vol. 115, March 2003, No. 3</ref> The book's introduction characterizes Darwinism by the central claim that "an unguided physical process can account for the emergence of all biological complexity and diversity".<ref>Dembski, ''Uncommon Dissent'', p. xx.''</ref> | {{POV-intro}}'''''Uncommon Dissent: Intellectuals Who Find Darwinism Unconvincing''''' is a ] anthology edited by ] activist ] in which fifteen intellectuals criticise "]", which they use to refer to the theory of ].<sup class="noprint">['']<font class="metadata"> — see ]</font>'']</sup>]<ref>"As I stated earlier, Johnson, Dembski, and their associates have assumed the task of destroying 'Darwinism,' 'evolutionary naturalism,' 'scientific materialism,' 'methodological naturalism,' 'philosophical naturalism,' and other 'isms' they use as synonyms for evolution." Barbara Forrest. March 2000. Quoted in William A. Dembski. May 14 2005</ref><ref>"In his latest Commentary essay on 'Darwinism' - as it is often called by those who do not know much evolutionary biology..." Paul Gross. Commentary Magazine, Vol. 115, March 2003, No. 3</ref> The book's introduction characterizes Darwinism by the central claim that "an unguided physical process can account for the emergence of all biological complexity and diversity".<ref>Dembski, ''Uncommon Dissent'', p. xx.''</ref> | ||
| It is published by the publishing wing of the ] ]. The foreword is by John Wilson, editor of the ] magazine '']''. Described by the Discovery Institute as "a summary of the widespread attack upon Darwinism by ... leading intellectuals,"<ref> Center for Science and Culture, June 1 2004.</ref> the book rejects{{fact}} the broad acceptance of ] within the ].<ref>National Association of Biology Teachers </ref><ref> Joint statement issued by the national science academies of 67 countries, including the ] ] (PDF file)</ref><ref>From the ], the world's largest general scientific society: (PDF file), </ref> In her expert witness report for the ] trial ] cited ] fellow ]'s writings in Uncommon Dissent as evidence of the religious foundations of the institute's ] and of intelligent design.<ref> ], April 1, 2005, page 29.</ref> | It is published by the publishing wing of the ] ]. The foreword is by John Wilson, editor of the ] magazine '']''. Described by the Discovery Institute as "a summary of the widespread attack upon Darwinism by ... leading intellectuals,"<ref> Center for Science and Culture, June 1 2004.</ref> the book rejects<sup class="noprint">['']<font class="metadata"> — see ]</font>'']</sup>]{{fact}} the broad acceptance of ] within the ].<ref>National Association of Biology Teachers </ref><ref> Joint statement issued by the national science academies of 67 countries, including the ] ] (PDF file)</ref><ref>From the ], the world's largest general scientific society: (PDF file), </ref> In her expert witness report for the ] trial ] cited ] fellow ]'s writings in Uncommon Dissent as evidence of the religious foundations of the institute's ] and of intelligent design.<ref> ], April 1, 2005, page 29.</ref> | ||
| The title is a pun on the principle of biology known as ]. | The title is a pun on the principle of biology known as ]. | ||
Revision as of 20:33, 22 December 2006
 | The neutrality of this article's introduction is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Uncommon Dissent: Intellectuals Who Find Darwinism Unconvincing is a 2004 anthology edited by intelligent design activist William Dembski in which fifteen intellectuals criticise "Darwinism", which they use to refer to the theory of evolution. The book's introduction characterizes Darwinism by the central claim that "an unguided physical process can account for the emergence of all biological complexity and diversity".
It is published by the publishing wing of the paleoconservative Intercollegiate Studies Institute. The foreword is by John Wilson, editor of the evangelical Christian magazine Christianity Today. Described by the Discovery Institute as "a summary of the widespread attack upon Darwinism by ... leading intellectuals," the book rejects the broad acceptance of evolution within the scientific community. In her expert witness report for the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District trial Barbara Forrest cited Discovery Institute fellow Nancy R. Pearcey's writings in Uncommon Dissent as evidence of the religious foundations of the institute's Wedge strategy and of intelligent design.
The title is a pun on the principle of biology known as common descent.
Topics Addressed
The book contains four sections: Part I: A Crisis of Confidence; Part II: Darwinism's Cultural Inroads; Part III: Leaving the Darwinian Fold; and Part IV: Auditing the Books. Part I, consisting of three essays, offers opinions on why Darwinism is questioned by the public at large. Part II, consisting of four essays, discusses the authors' opinions on the effects Darwinism has had on society and culture. Part III, consisting of three essays, deals with the personal intellectual journeys of contributors Behe, Denton, and Barham, whose attitudes toward Darwinism have changed through their lives. Part IV, consisting of four essays, presents the authors' opinions on the consistency and scope of Darwinism.
ISBN 1-932236-31-7
The Dissenters
The fifteen "dissenting intellectuals" are:
- William A. Dembski, intelligent design activist
- Robert Koons, philosopher, theologian, Christian apologist
- Phillip E. Johnson, lawyer, Christian apologist
- Marcel-Paul Schützenberger, mathematician
- Nancy R. Pearcey, Christian apologist
- Edward Sisson, attorney
- J. Budziszewski, philosopher
- Frank J. Tipler, mathematical physicist
- Michael J. Behe, biochemist
- Michael John Denton, biochemist
- James Barham, classical historian
- Cornelius G. Hunter, biophysicist
- Roland F. Hirsch, US Dept of Energy
- Christopher Michael Langan
- David Berlinski, popular mathematics author
Although at least three of the contributors work in biology-related fields, none is a professional biologist.
"Darwinism"
"Darwinism" is a term for the underlying theory in those ideas of Charles Darwin concerning evolution and natural selection, and can refer to evolution by natural selection, to evolution more broadly, or to other ideas not directly associated with the work of Darwin.
Contributor James Barham argues in Uncommon Dissent that "it is incorrect to simply equate Darwinism with belief in evolution." He distinguishes empirical Darwinism ("the idea that the formation of new species is due to random changes in individual organisms that happen to be 'selected' by the environment") from metaphysical Darwinism (the claim that "the theory of natural selection has successfully reduced all teleological and normative phenomena to the interplay of chance and necessity, thus eliminating purpose and value from our picture of the world"). For Barham, the "real problem with the evolution debate" is not empirical Darwinism, but a sort of "theory creep" in which a "bold but circumscribed scientific claim" (empirical Darwinism) becomes conflated with "a much more sweeping philosophical claim" (metaphysical Darwinism).
References
- "As I stated earlier, Johnson, Dembski, and their associates have assumed the task of destroying 'Darwinism,' 'evolutionary naturalism,' 'scientific materialism,' 'methodological naturalism,' 'philosophical naturalism,' and other 'isms' they use as synonyms for evolution." Barbara Forrest’s Letter to Simon Blackburn Barbara Forrest. March 2000. Quoted in Rebuttal to Reports by Opposing Expert Witnesses William A. Dembski. May 14 2005
- "In his latest Commentary essay on 'Darwinism' - as it is often called by those who do not know much evolutionary biology..." Darwinism Versus Intelligent Design Paul Gross. Commentary Magazine, Vol. 115, March 2003, No. 3
- Dembski, Uncommon Dissent, p. xx.
- Uncommon Dissent, Intellectuals who find Darwinism Unconvincing Center for Science and Culture, June 1 2004.
- National Association of Biology Teachers Statement on Teaching Evolution
- IAP Statement on the Teaching of Evolution Joint statement issued by the national science academies of 67 countries, including the United Kingdom's Royal Society (PDF file)
- From the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the world's largest general scientific society: 2006 Statement on the Teaching of Evolution (PDF file), AAAS Denounces Anti-Evolution Laws
- Expert Witness Report Barbara Forrest, April 1, 2005, page 29.
- Barham, Uncommon Dissent, pp. 177–8.
External links
- "The Myths of Darwinism" - the book's introduction, by William Dembski
- "Refereed Journals: Do They Insure Quality or Enforce Orthodoxy?" - Frank Tipler's chapter