Revision as of 23:10, 22 December 2006 editGiano II (talk | contribs)22,233 edits →Disruption← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:25, 22 December 2006 edit undoGiano II (talk | contribs)22,233 edits →DisruptionNext edit → | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
Thanks Slim nice request there they have plotted this on IRC I have all the logs. It was one hell of a mistake on their part. Now it is payback time. ] 23:10, 22 December 2006 (UTC) | Thanks Slim nice request there they have plotted this on IRC I have all the logs. It was one hell of a mistake on their part. Now it is payback time. ] 23:10, 22 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
::Oh yeah almost forgot some food for thought - Kelly Martin is now editing again - as a sock - anyone besides me know who? Just a little taste of things to come ] 23:25, 22 December 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:25, 22 December 2006
Old messages are at
- User talk:Giano archive 1(2004)
- User talk:Giano archive 2 (2005)
- User talk:Giano archive 3 (2005)
- User talk:Giano archive 4 (2006)
- User talk:Giano archive 5 (2006)
Please leave new messages at the foot of the page
Architecture notability
To counter spurious time consuming AfD's, I've had a stab at a draft policy for architectural notability here. I've attempted to restrict the scope of the proposal to actual 'works of architecture', architects, building technology and legal aspects of the profession. Buildings and structures notability enmasse should probably be a separate enterprise, or at least a later one. I need to give some thought to threshold notability and have shied away from minor works by major architects, because buildings are not like music or literature, they cannot generally be ignored by the public and play some kind of role in most built environments, so I argue the impact is beyond just they're effectiveness or otherwise as a work of art. Comments (by anyone) gladly received. Cheers --Mcginnly | Natter 21:35, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
the dreaded infoboxes
Disruption
Giano, I am 57 and this is just obnoxious. Your persistent incivility has passed the point of being disruptive. Please stop now. Tom Harrison 22:49, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks Slim nice request there they have plotted this on IRC I have all the logs. It was one hell of a mistake on their part. Now it is payback time. Giano 23:10, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oh yeah almost forgot some food for thought - Kelly Martin is now editing again - as a sock - anyone besides me know who? Just a little taste of things to come Giano 23:25, 22 December 2006 (UTC)