| Revision as of 18:40, 15 June 2020 edit87.116.178.123 (talk)No edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:38, 9 July 2020 edit undoDawnseeker2000 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers483,018 editsm date format audit, minor formattingTag: AWBNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Use dmy dates|date= |
{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2020}} | ||
| {{Infobox royalty | {{Infobox royalty | ||
| |image= Sveti Uros Car Srpski, Nova iskra (1899).jpg | |image= Sveti Uros Car Srpski, Nova iskra (1899).jpg | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| ==Early life== | ==Early life== | ||
| Stefan Uroš V was the only son of Stefan Uroš IV Dušan by ], the sister of ]. He had been crowned as king (second highest title) in the capacity of heir and co-ruler after Dušan was crowned emperor in 1346.{{sfn|Ćirković|2004|pp= |
Stefan Uroš V was the only son of Stefan Uroš IV Dušan by ], the sister of ]. He had been crowned as king (second highest title) in the capacity of heir and co-ruler after Dušan was crowned emperor in 1346.{{sfn|Ćirković|2004|pp=64–65}} Although by the time of his succession as sole ruler and emperor in 1355 Stefan Uroš V was no longer a minor, he remained heavily dependent on his mother and various members of the court. | ||
| ==Reign== | ==Reign== | ||
| The account of the contemporary ] describes a descent of the Serbian Empire into disintegration soon after death of Uroš' father and his accession.<ref>{{harvnb|Mihaljčić|1975|pp=11–12}}</ref><ref>Kantakouzenos III, 314</ref> However, Kantakouzenos mainly focused on the Greek lands rather than the Serbian core lands. Further the general disorder long with the powerlessness of the center represents the situation that arose much later in Uroš's reign.<ref>{{harvnb|Mihaljčić|1975|pp=11–12}}</ref> According to Mihaljčić, during the initial years of his rule the threats to the territorial integrity of Uroš's empire in the south came mainly from external attacks.<ref>{{harvnb|Mihaljčić|1975|p=13}}</ref> | The account of the contemporary ] describes a descent of the Serbian Empire into disintegration soon after death of Uroš' father and his accession.<ref>{{harvnb|Mihaljčić|1975|pp=11–12}}</ref><ref>Kantakouzenos III, 314</ref> However, Kantakouzenos mainly focused on the Greek lands rather than the Serbian core lands. Further the general disorder long with the powerlessness of the center represents the situation that arose much later in Uroš's reign.<ref>{{harvnb|Mihaljčić|1975|pp=11–12}}</ref> According to Mihaljčić, during the initial years of his rule the threats to the territorial integrity of Uroš's empire in the south came mainly from external attacks.<ref>{{harvnb|Mihaljčić|1975|p=13}}</ref> | ||
| The death of Uroš's father was quickly followed by the death of ], who governed ]. In the spring of 1356, |
The death of Uroš's father was quickly followed by the death of ], who governed ]. In the spring of 1356, ] landed a force on the coast of Thessaly and quickly overran it. He then followed up this success by driving despot ] from ] and ].<ref>{{harvnb|Mihaljčić|1975|p=13}}</ref> Simeon was paternal uncle and the closest male relative of young Emperor Uroš. Retreating to Epirus and western Macedonia, he seized ] and proclaimed himself Tsar in hope of becoming co-ruler, or even replace young Uroš on the Serbian throne.<ref>{{harvnb|Mihaljčić|1975|p=14}}</ref> His claim was not widely welcomed, and the support he gained was limited to the some southern regions.<ref>{{harvnb|Mihaljčić|1975|p=17}}</ref> The Sabor (state council) held in ] did not accept Simeon's claims and following the endorsement of the magnates, Uroš became more energetic in his political activities, publishing a number of charters.<ref>{{harvnb|Mihaljčić|1975|p=17}}</ref> In 1358, Simeon attacked the ] region, trying to capture the old Serbia region of ], but was defeated.<ref>{{harvnb|Mihaljčić|1975|pp=18–19}}</ref> Defeated in the north, Simeon again turned to south, retaking ] and ] in 1359, where he continued to rule with the title "emperor of Serbs and Greeks".{{sfn|Ćirković|2004|pp=75–76}} | ||
| ]]] | ]]] | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| There is one account, early in his reign, that is in contrast to his general record of incompetence. In 1356, Matthew Kantakouzenos, a pretender to the ] throne, gathered an army of 5,000 Turks and marched on ], the Serbian-held capital of ]. Uroš V, whose mother ruled from Serres, decided to raise an army to defend his mother. In 1357, when Matthew and his Turks attacked, the Serbian army under ] of Drama (a major player in that region) came to aid. The Turks were defeated. Matthew Kantakouzenos was captured and held hostage until his ransom was paid by the ] ]. | There is one account, early in his reign, that is in contrast to his general record of incompetence. In 1356, Matthew Kantakouzenos, a pretender to the ] throne, gathered an army of 5,000 Turks and marched on ], the Serbian-held capital of ]. Uroš V, whose mother ruled from Serres, decided to raise an army to defend his mother. In 1357, when Matthew and his Turks attacked, the Serbian army under ] of Drama (a major player in that region) came to aid. The Turks were defeated. Matthew Kantakouzenos was captured and held hostage until his ransom was paid by the ] ]. | ||
| In following years, ] gradually fragmented into a conglomeration of principalities, some of which did not even nominally acknowledge Uroš's rule. His position was not helped by his mother Helena, who started to rule autonomously from Serres in alliance with ]. A similarly autonomous posture was assumed by the ] family, the ] family, ]. By 1365, the most powerful Serbian nobleman became Uglješa's brother ] who became co-ruler with Emperor Uroš and was granted the title of Serbian King.{{sfn|Ćirković|2004|pp= |
In following years, ] gradually fragmented into a conglomeration of principalities, some of which did not even nominally acknowledge Uroš's rule. His position was not helped by his mother Helena, who started to rule autonomously from Serres in alliance with ]. A similarly autonomous posture was assumed by the ] family, the ] family, ]. By 1365, the most powerful Serbian nobleman became Uglješa's brother ] who became co-ruler with Emperor Uroš and was granted the title of Serbian King.{{sfn|Ćirković|2004|pp=77–79}} By 1369, as Uroš was childless, Vukašin designated his eldest son ] as heir to the throne, with the title of "young king".{{sfn|Sedlar|1994|pp=31}} | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| Stefan Uroš V died childless in December 1371, after much of the ] had been destroyed by the ] in the ] earlier that year.{{sfn|Ostrogorsky|1956|pp=481, 485}}{{sfn|Ćirković|2004|pp= |
Stefan Uroš V died childless in December 1371, after much of the ] had been destroyed by the ] in the ] earlier that year.{{sfn|Ostrogorsky|1956|pp=481, 485}}{{sfn|Ćirković|2004|pp=79–80}} The exact cause of his death at a relatively young age remains unknown. Vukašin's son ] inherited his father's royal title, but real power in northern Serbia was held by ]. The latter did not assume the imperial or royal titles (associated with the ]), and in 1377 accepted King ] (a maternal grandson of ]) as titular king of Serbia. Serbia proper became a vassal of the Ottomans in 1390, but remained effectively ruled by the ] family and then by their ] successors until the fall of ] in 1459. | ||
| Following the great conquests of his father, Uroš became a victim of new nobles in a Serbia enriched by recent war and pillaging. The maintaining of order and state instruments was impossible because of weak or nonexistent infrastructure between the old and new territories. The exceptional modesty and tolerance of this ruler was the main reason he was called "the weak", and also the reason he was canonized 211 years after his death. | Following the great conquests of his father, Uroš became a victim of new nobles in a Serbia enriched by recent war and pillaging. The maintaining of order and state instruments was impossible because of weak or nonexistent infrastructure between the old and new territories. The exceptional modesty and tolerance of this ruler was the main reason he was called "the weak", and also the reason he was canonized 211 years after his death. | ||
| Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
| {{Authority control}} | {{Authority control}} | ||
| {{DEFAULTSORT:Stefan Uros 05 |
{{DEFAULTSORT:Stefan Uros 05 of Serbia}} | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | ] | ||
Revision as of 06:38, 9 July 2020
King of Serbia
| Stefan Uroš V | |
|---|---|
.jpg) | |
| King of Serbia | |
| Reign | 1346–1355 |
| Predecessor | Stefan Dušan |
| Successor | None, empire collapeses |
| Emperor of the Serbs | |
| Reign | 1355–1371 |
| Predecessor | Stefan Dušan |
| Born | c. 1336 |
| Died | 4 December 1371 |
| Burial | Gornje Nerodimlje, near Uroševac Monasteries of Fruška Gora (since 1690), finally to Jazak monastery |
| Spouse | Anna of Wallachia |
| Dynasty | Nemanjić |
| Father | Stefan Dušan |
| Mother | Helena of Bulgaria |
| Religion | Serbian Orthodox |
Saint Stefan Uroš V (Template:Lang-sr pronounced [stêfaːn ûroʃ peːti] ; 1336 – 2/4 December 1371), known in historiography as Uroš the Weak (Урош Нејаки/Uroš Nejaki), was the second Emperor (Tsar) of the Serbian Empire (1355–1371), and before that he was Serbian King and co-ruler (since 1346) with his father, Emperor Stefan Dušan.
Early life
Stefan Uroš V was the only son of Stefan Uroš IV Dušan by Helena of Bulgaria, the sister of Ivan Alexander of Bulgaria. He had been crowned as king (second highest title) in the capacity of heir and co-ruler after Dušan was crowned emperor in 1346. Although by the time of his succession as sole ruler and emperor in 1355 Stefan Uroš V was no longer a minor, he remained heavily dependent on his mother and various members of the court.
Reign
The account of the contemporary John VI Kantakouzenos describes a descent of the Serbian Empire into disintegration soon after death of Uroš' father and his accession. However, Kantakouzenos mainly focused on the Greek lands rather than the Serbian core lands. Further the general disorder long with the powerlessness of the center represents the situation that arose much later in Uroš's reign. According to Mihaljčić, during the initial years of his rule the threats to the territorial integrity of Uroš's empire in the south came mainly from external attacks.
The death of Uroš's father was quickly followed by the death of Preljub, who governed Thessaly. In the spring of 1356, Nikephoros Orsini landed a force on the coast of Thessaly and quickly overran it. He then followed up this success by driving despot Simeon Uroš from Aetolia and Acarnania. Simeon was paternal uncle and the closest male relative of young Emperor Uroš. Retreating to Epirus and western Macedonia, he seized Kostur and proclaimed himself Tsar in hope of becoming co-ruler, or even replace young Uroš on the Serbian throne. His claim was not widely welcomed, and the support he gained was limited to the some southern regions. The Sabor (state council) held in Skoplje did not accept Simeon's claims and following the endorsement of the magnates, Uroš became more energetic in his political activities, publishing a number of charters. In 1358, Simeon attacked the Skadar region, trying to capture the old Serbia region of Zeta, but was defeated. Defeated in the north, Simeon again turned to south, retaking Epirus and Thessaly in 1359, where he continued to rule with the title "emperor of Serbs and Greeks".
There is one account, early in his reign, that is in contrast to his general record of incompetence. In 1356, Matthew Kantakouzenos, a pretender to the Byzantine throne, gathered an army of 5,000 Turks and marched on Serres, the Serbian-held capital of Jovan Uglješa. Uroš V, whose mother ruled from Serres, decided to raise an army to defend his mother. In 1357, when Matthew and his Turks attacked, the Serbian army under Vojihna of Drama (a major player in that region) came to aid. The Turks were defeated. Matthew Kantakouzenos was captured and held hostage until his ransom was paid by the Byzantine Emperor John V Palaiologos.
In following years, Serbian Empire gradually fragmented into a conglomeration of principalities, some of which did not even nominally acknowledge Uroš's rule. His position was not helped by his mother Helena, who started to rule autonomously from Serres in alliance with Jovan Uglješa. A similarly autonomous posture was assumed by the Dejanović family, the Balšić family, Nikola Altomanović. By 1365, the most powerful Serbian nobleman became Uglješa's brother Vukašin Mrnjavčević who became co-ruler with Emperor Uroš and was granted the title of Serbian King. By 1369, as Uroš was childless, Vukašin designated his eldest son Prince Marko as heir to the throne, with the title of "young king".
Stefan Uroš V died childless in December 1371, after much of the Serbian nobility had been destroyed by the Turks in the Battle of Maritsa earlier that year. The exact cause of his death at a relatively young age remains unknown. Vukašin's son Prince Marko inherited his father's royal title, but real power in northern Serbia was held by Lazar Hrebeljanović. The latter did not assume the imperial or royal titles (associated with the Nemanjić dynasty), and in 1377 accepted King Tvrtko I of Bosnia (a maternal grandson of Stefan Dragutin) as titular king of Serbia. Serbia proper became a vassal of the Ottomans in 1390, but remained effectively ruled by the Lazarević family and then by their Branković successors until the fall of Smederevo in 1459.
Following the great conquests of his father, Uroš became a victim of new nobles in a Serbia enriched by recent war and pillaging. The maintaining of order and state instruments was impossible because of weak or nonexistent infrastructure between the old and new territories. The exceptional modesty and tolerance of this ruler was the main reason he was called "the weak", and also the reason he was canonized 211 years after his death.
Stefan Uroš V was canonized by the Serbian Orthodox Church. His body is kept in the Jazak monastery on Fruška Gora mountain.
Legacy
Today, Stefan Uroš V is viewed mostly in contrast to his able and strong-willed father, as a lacking and indecisive ruler, unable to keep the Serbian nobility under his control, whose weak and unassertive personality greatly contributed to the fall of the Empire and the eventual destruction of the Serbian state by the Ottomans. In Serbian folklore and epic poems he is often described as a just, well-intentioned ruler of pleasant appearance but weak character. While this view is popular among historians as well, some argue that he was not especially incompetent in his role as Emperor of Serbia, and that the decline of the empire was much less spectacular and started much later into his rule than popular opinion suggests. For a long time, it was considered a historical fact that he was murdered by his co-ruler, Vukašin Mrnjavčević, but eventually Vukašin was proven to have died before the Emperor.
In 1825 Stefan Stefanović, a Serbian writer living in the Austrian Empire wrote a tragic play called The Death of Uroš V, which drew inspiration from both facts and folk tradition about Uroš, including the aforementioned belief that he was killed by King Vukašin.
See also
References
- Ćirković 2004, pp. 64–65, 75–80.
- Ćirković 2004, pp. 64–65.
- Mihaljčić 1975, pp. 11–12
- Kantakouzenos III, 314
- Mihaljčić 1975, pp. 11–12
- Mihaljčić 1975, p. 13
- Mihaljčić 1975, p. 13
- Mihaljčić 1975, p. 14
- Mihaljčić 1975, p. 17
- Mihaljčić 1975, p. 17
- Mihaljčić 1975, pp. 18–19
- Ćirković 2004, pp. 75–76.
- Ćirković 2004, pp. 77–79.
- Sedlar 1994, pp. 31.
- Ostrogorsky 1956, pp. 481, 485.
- Ćirković 2004, pp. 79–80.
Sources
- Ćirković, Sima (2004). The Serbs. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
{{cite book}}: Invalid|ref=harv(help) - Dvornik, Francis (1962). The Slavs in European History and Civilization. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
{{cite book}}: Invalid|ref=harv(help) - Fine, John Van Antwerp Jr. (1994) . The Late Medieval Balkans: A Critical Survey from the Late Twelfth Century to the Ottoman Conquest. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
{{cite book}}: Invalid|ref=harv(help) - Gavrilović, Zaga (2001). Studies in Byzantine and Serbian Medieval Art. London: The Pindar Press.
{{cite book}}: Invalid|ref=harv(help) - Mihaljčić, Rade (1975). Крај Српског царства [End of the Serbian Empire]. Belgrade: Srpska književna zadruga.
{{cite book}}: Invalid|ref=harv(help) - Mihaljčić, Rade (1989). Крај Српског царства [End of the Serbian Empire] (2nd ed.). Belgrade: Beogradski izdavačko-grafički zavod.
{{cite book}}: Invalid|ref=harv(help) - Nicol, Donald M. (1993) . The Last Centuries of Byzantium, 1261-1453. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
{{cite book}}: Invalid|ref=harv(help) - Nicol, Donald M. (1996). The Reluctant Emperor: A Biography of John Cantacuzene, Byzantine Emperor and Monk, c. 1295-1383. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
{{cite book}}: Invalid|ref=harv(help) - Ostrogorsky, George (1956). History of the Byzantine State. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
{{cite book}}: Invalid|ref=harv(help) - Popović, Tatyana (1988). Prince Marko: The Hero of South Slavic Epics. New York: Syracuse University Press.
{{cite book}}: Invalid|ref=harv(help) - Sedlar, Jean W. (1994). East Central Europe in the Middle Ages, 1000-1500. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
{{cite book}}: Invalid|ref=harv(help) - Soulis, George Christos (1984). The Serbs and Byzantium during the reign of Tsar Stephen Dušan (1331-1355) and his successors. Washington: Dumbarton Oaks Library and Collection.
{{cite book}}: Invalid|ref=harv(help) - Šuica, Marko (2000). Немирно доба српског средњег века. Властела српских обласних господара. Službeni list SRJ. ISBN 978-86-355-0452-0.
{{cite book}}: Invalid|ref=harv(help) - Translated with small changes from small encyclopedia "Sveznanje" published by "Narodno delo", Belgrade, in 1937 which is today in public domain.
| Regnal titles | ||
|---|---|---|
| Preceded byStefan Dušan | Emperor of the Serbs 1355–1371 |
Fall of the Serbian Empire |
| King of Serbia 1346–1355 |
VacantTitle next held byVukašin | |
| Nemanjić dynasty | ||
|---|---|---|
| Main ruling members |  | |
| Other ruling members | ||
| Archbishops | ||
| Minor members | ||
| Female members | ||
| Consorts | ||