Misplaced Pages

:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:36, 16 June 2020 view sourceLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,591 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 12) (bot← Previous edit Revision as of 06:23, 18 June 2020 view source Joe Roe (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Administrators41,994 edits →Revocation of CheckUser access for Bbb23: new sectionNext edit →
Line 52: Line 52:
For the Arbitration Committee, &ndash;&#8239;]&nbsp;<small>(])</small> 18:23, 15 June 2020 (UTC) For the Arbitration Committee, &ndash;&#8239;]&nbsp;<small>(])</small> 18:23, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
: Discuss this at: ''']'''<!-- ] (]) 18:24, 15 June 2020 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes--> : Discuss this at: ''']'''<!-- ] (]) 18:24, 15 June 2020 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->

== Revocation of CheckUser access for Bbb23 ==

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

{{ivmbox|In April, the Arbitration Committee privately warned {{admin|Bbb23}} that his use of the ] had been contrary to ] and ] policies prohibiting checking accounts where there is insufficient evidence to suspect abusive sockpuppetry ("fishing"). The committee additionally imposed specific restrictions on Bbb23's use of the CheckUser tool in ambiguous cases otherwise considered to be within the discretion of individual CheckUsers. Bbb23 has subsequently communicated to the committee that he is unwilling to comply with these restrictions, continued to run similar questionable checks, and refused to ]. Accordingly, Bbb23's CheckUser access is ].}}

:'''Support:''' ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ]
:'''Oppose''':
:'''Recuse''': ]
:'''Inactive''': ], ]

For the Arbitration Committee, &ndash;&#8239;]&nbsp;<small>(])</small> 06:23, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:23, 18 June 2020

Weighing scales Arbitration​Committee
Misplaced Pages Arbitration
Open proceedings
Active sanctions
Arbitration Committee
Audit
Track related changes
Shortcuts

This noticeboard is for announcements and statements made by the Arbitration Committee. Only members of the Arbitration Committee or the Committee's Clerks may post on this page, but all editors are encouraged to comment on the talk page.

Announcement archives:
  • 0 (2008-12 – 2009-01)
  • 1 (to 2009-02)
  • 2 (to 2009-05)
  • 3 (to 2009-06)
  • 4 (to 2009-07)
  • 5 (to 2009-12)
  • 6 (to 2010-12)
  • 7 (to 2011-12)
  • 8 (to 2012-12)
  • 9 (to 2013-12)
  • 10 (to 2015-12)
  • 11 (to 2018-04)
  • 12 (to 2020-08)
  • 13 (to 2023-03)
  • 14 (to present)

Antisemitism in Poland: Motion (May 2020)

The following is added as a remedy to the Antisemitism in Poland arbitration case: 7) 500/30 restriction: All IP editors, users with fewer than 500 edits, and users with less than 30 days' tenure are prohibited from editing articles related to the history of Jews and antisemitism in Poland during World War II (1933–45), including the Holocaust in Poland. This prohibition may be enforced preemptively by use of extended confirmed protection (ECP), or by other methods such as reverts, pending changes protection, and appropriate edit filters. Reverts made solely to enforce the 500/30 rule are not considered edit warring.

    • Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may use the Talk: namespace to post constructive comments and make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Talk pages where disruption occurs may be managed by the methods mentioned above.
    • Standard discretionary sanctions as authorized by the Eastern Europe arbitration case remain in effect for this topic area.

Passed 6 to 0 by motion at 19:57, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

For the arbitration committee, Moneytrees🌴 20:35, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Archived discussion at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 46#Antisemitism in Poland: Motion (May 2020)

Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Medicine closed

An arbitration case Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Medicine has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

  • Standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all discussions about pharmaceutical drug prices and pricing and for edits adding, changing, or removing pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing from articles. Any uninvolved administrator may apply sanctions as an arbitration enforcement action to users editing in this topic area, after an initial warning.
  • CFCF is reminded to avoid casting aspersions and similar conduct in the future.
  • Doc James is prohibited from making any edits relating to pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing in the article namespace.
  • QuackGuru is indefinitely topic-banned from articles relating to medicine, broadly construed.

For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz 15:08, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Medicine closed

Anti-harassment RfC open

The Arbitration Committee has opened the anti-harassment RfC, and invites discussion from interested editors. Maxim(talk) 13:56, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Anti-harassment RfC open

Account restriction (User:Therapyisgood)

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

Due to recent misuse of multiple accounts, Therapyisgood (talk · contribs) is indefinitely restricted to editing with one account.

Support: Joe Roe, Maxim, SoWhy, Casliber, Bradv, Beeblebrox

Oppose:

Recuse:

For the Arbitration Committee, – Joe (talk) 18:23, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Account restriction (User:Therapyisgood)

Revocation of CheckUser access for Bbb23

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

In April, the Arbitration Committee privately warned Bbb23 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) that his use of the CheckUser tool had been contrary to local and global policies prohibiting checking accounts where there is insufficient evidence to suspect abusive sockpuppetry ("fishing"). The committee additionally imposed specific restrictions on Bbb23's use of the CheckUser tool in ambiguous cases otherwise considered to be within the discretion of individual CheckUsers. Bbb23 has subsequently communicated to the committee that he is unwilling to comply with these restrictions, continued to run similar questionable checks, and refused to explain these checks on request. Accordingly, Bbb23's CheckUser access is revoked.

Support: Joe Roe, Bradv, Beeblebrox, Maxim, David Fuchs, xeno, Worm That Turned, SoWhy, Casliber, Newyorkbrad, DGG
Oppose:
Recuse: KrakatoaKatie
Inactive: GorillaWarfare, Mkdw

For the Arbitration Committee, – Joe (talk) 06:23, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Categories: