Talk:Battle of Edson's Ridge: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 01:48, 27 December 2006 editCla68 (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers48,127 edits peer and A-class review← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:53, 28 December 2006 edit undoCla68 (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers48,127 edits wikilinkNext edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:
	\|WWII-task-force=yes}}		\|WWII-task-force=yes}}

	Just a note to explain why I chose "Edson's Ridge" as the article name instead of "Bloody Ridge" or "The Ridge"...All three names are used about equally as titles for the battle in the available sources. I chose "Edson's Ridge" because it's the most unique of the three names. "Bloody Ridge" is also the name of a battle in the ] and "The Ridge," I thought, is too generic. ] 01:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC)		Just a note to explain why I chose "Edson's Ridge" as the article name instead of "Bloody Ridge" or "The Ridge"...All three names are used about equally as titles for the battle in the available sources. I chose "Edson's Ridge" because it's the most unique of the three names. "Bloody Ridge" is also the name of a battle in the ] and "The Ridge," I thought, is too generic. ] 01:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:53, 28 December 2006

Military history: Asian / South Pacific / Japanese / North America / United States / World War II Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	Japanese military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Additional information:
/
	This article is currently undergoing an A-Class review.

Just a note to explain why I chose "Edson's Ridge" as the article name instead of "Bloody Ridge" or "The Ridge"...All three names are used about equally as titles for the battle in the available sources. I chose "Edson's Ridge" because it's the most unique of the three names. "Bloody Ridge" is also the name of a battle in the Korean War and "The Ridge," I thought, is too generic. Cla68 01:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Categories: