| Revision as of 10:18, 27 May 2003 editJordi Burguet Castell (talk | contribs)418 editsm about "recent studies", suggest removal of very unlikely claim← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:30, 27 May 2003 edit undoKorpo~enwiki (talk | contribs)109 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| I suggest this be removed, and the source for any other claims be verified. -- ] May 27 10:14 UTC 2003 | I suggest this be removed, and the source for any other claims be verified. -- ] May 27 10:14 UTC 2003 | ||
| Article about the damage by radiation: http://www.heise.de/tp/deutsch/html/result.xhtml?url=/tp/deutsch/inhalt/lis/14534/1.html&words=Strahlung | |||
Revision as of 15:30, 27 May 2003
concern about chemical toxicity of depleted uranium munitions: is this about the remains of used munition or also about handling munition? - Patrick 08:05 Dec 27, 2002 (UTC)
Recent studies of scientific bodies outside the USA and the UK
Which studies? Where can one find them?
Small amounts of radiation may even be more harmful to the body as bigger doses may be. While bigger doses kill cells, smaller doses only damage them. While dead cells are replaced by the body, these damaged cells are a possible source of cancer.
As far as I know, that is nonsense. What kind of study said that? The more radiation you get (the integral), the worse it is. It is false that "big doses kill cells" while "smaller doses only damage them", both big and small doses kill and damage a certain amount of cells, but of course big do more of both, killing (some cellules) and damaging (many others).
I suggest this be removed, and the source for any other claims be verified. -- jbc May 27 10:14 UTC 2003
Article about the damage by radiation: http://www.heise.de/tp/deutsch/html/result.xhtml?url=/tp/deutsch/inhalt/lis/14534/1.html&words=Strahlung