Misplaced Pages

Datapackets: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:21, 28 January 2005 editAgquarx (talk | contribs)190 editsm ...got a reverse of a 'writers block', this is VERY much work in progress, enter at your own risk...← Previous edit Revision as of 09:26, 28 January 2005 edit undoAgquarx (talk | contribs)190 editsm ...got a reverse of a 'writers block', this is VERY much work in progress, enter at your own risk...Next edit →
Line 6: Line 6:
---- ----


* BEWARE! EVERYTHING BELOW IS DEFINED '''FORWARDTHINKING''', fowardthinking is the "natural" way of perceiving events, that is - I choose this(these) event(s) look(s) like C.A.U.S.E., AFTER { this } FORWARD I choose that(these) event(s) which(whom) look(s) like E.F.F.E.C.T. I think it is self-explanatory what BACKWARDTHINKING means. IF you backwardthink you get an answer before you ask the question, you get a meaning of a symbol before the symbol is presented to your sensory inputs, you get an "effect" before you volition (wilIt, grok, observe) a "cause". It does NOT mean going forward or backward IN time, the difference is in perception, not flow of time, because there is NO FLOW OF TIME, all the events ARE simultaneously. There is no past, now, future. What is I call the EVERNOW. The "flow of time is an attribute of our Self, a feeling, just like self-awareness, dreaming, being awake - a STATE of the mind (I SELF or ISelf or {@}). ] 09:21, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC) * BEWARE! EVERYTHING BELOW IS DEFINED '''FORWARDTHINKING''', fowardthinking is the "natural" way of perceiving events, that is - I choose this(these) event(s) look(s) like C.A.U.S.E., AFTER { this } FORWARD I choose that(these) event(s) which(whom) look(s) like E.F.F.E.C.T. I think it is self-explanatory what BACKWARDTHINKING means. IF you backwardthink you get an answer before you ask the question, you get a meaning of a symbol before the symbol is presented to your sensory inputs, you get an "effect" before you volition (wilIt, grok, observe) a "cause". It does NOT mean going forward or backward IN time, the difference is in perception, not flow of time, because there is NO FLOW OF TIME, all the events ARE simultaneously. There is no past, now, future. What is I call the EVERNOW. The "flow of time is an attribute of our Self, a feeling, just like self-awareness, dreaming, being awake - a STATE of the mind (I SELF or ISelf or {@}). ] 09:26, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)


---- ----
Line 12: Line 12:
---- ----


* FOR BRAVE SOULS - Try watching your fauvorite movie backwardthinking, choose one you are sure to grok in it's fullness, know inside-out, can quote most of dialogues etc, You might archieve surprising insight into deeper structures and or meanings of the things, persons, events, symbols contained in the narrative of the movie you thought you've SEEN before. ] 09:21, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC) * FOR BRAVE SOULS - Try watching your fauvorite movie backwardthinking, choose one you are sure to grok in it's fullness, know inside-out, can quote most of dialogues etc, You might archieve surprising insight into deeper structures and or meanings of the things, persons, events, symbols contained in the narrative of the movie you thought you've SEEN before. ] 09:26, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)


---- ----
:: Backwardthinking requires a bit of training (some people say it is extremely difficult, some say it's only hard at the beginning, just like learning to right on a bicycle) OR an ] ("the one that divinates the Self"), that is, a certain kind of ]s, which you generally take to '''really''' expand your ], these are not the drugs you take to cram study before final exams and then fail because of general exchaustion, the effects of this class of ] vary from subtle alterations of perception (rainbows everywhere) to life changing experience. The preferred way ] (my ] tells ] that what you should be looking for is called ]. This is a totally new ], not present in ]; an effect of complicated ] ]. It's a ] (from the same ] as ], the ]). It was first ] by a one of the greatest IF not the greatest living ] on ], professor ]. ] 09:21, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC) :: Backwardthinking requires a bit of training (some people say it is extremely difficult, some say it's only hard at the beginning, just like learning to right on a bicycle) OR an ] ("the one that divinates the Self"), that is, a certain kind of ]s, which you generally take to '''really''' expand your ], these are not the drugs you take to cram study before final exams and then fail because of general exchaustion, the effects of this class of ] vary from subtle alterations of perception (rainbows everywhere) to life changing experience. The preferred way ] (my ] tells ] that what you should be looking for is called ]. This is a totally new ], not present in ]; an effect of complicated ] ]. It's a ] (from the same ] as ], the ]). It was first ] by a one of the greatest IF not the greatest living ] on ], professor ]. ] 09:26, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
:: Up to '''NOW''' I haven't seen any reports whatsoever resembling of an indication of any real ] for takeing this drug and as it is avaliable ]ly easy on the ] for several years since it was discovered by ]s of the Dark Side, I imply by ] that although it is a ], not ] and ] (] says you can't eat it out of your ] and with full ] of possible consequences. How can One argue with ]?)... ] 09:21, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC) :: Up to '''NOW''' I haven't seen any reports whatsoever resembling of an indication of any real ] for takeing this drug and as it is avaliable ]ly easy on the ] for several years since it was discovered by ]s of the Dark Side, I imply by ] that although it is a ], not ] and ] (] says you can't eat it out of your ] and with full ] of possible consequences. How can One argue with ]?)... ] 09:26, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
:: So I think I can refer to it with a clear ], I MySelf took it several times, in doses from 25 to 50 milligram of ] (typical dose is betwen 15 and 20 milligram, but as you SEE, I am a ] ] and crazy as the ] :8)). I bought 300 mg of it back then, before it was put on a ] (and like always, for no real reason, lot's of ], ] ] scientific ], don't we just '''LOVE''' how our ]s '''CARE''' for our ] '''SO MUCH'''? I guess our ] are a ] and we are forbidden to decide, '''*gee*''', they '''STILL''' let us to ], I am '''SO''' excited! ] ]!), from a legal, professional ], money transfer went heavily encrypted through overflowing abyss of the ] ('''DID YOU KNOW''' that the ] is a '''she'''?). ] 09:21, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC) :: So I think I can refer to it with a clear ], I MySelf took it several times, in doses from 25 to 50 milligram of ] (typical dose is betwen 15 and 20 milligram, but as you SEE, I am a ] ] and crazy as the ] :8)). I bought 300 mg of it back then, before it was put on a ] (and like always, for no real reason, lot's of ], ] ] scientific ], don't we just '''LOVE''' how our ]s '''CARE''' for our ] '''SO MUCH'''? I guess our ] are a ] and we are forbidden to decide, '''*gee*''', they '''STILL''' let us to ], I am '''SO''' excited! ] ]!), from a legal, professional ], money transfer went heavily encrypted through overflowing abyss of the ] ('''DID YOU KNOW''' that the ] is a '''she'''?). ] 09:26, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
:: I have no idea what you '''MIGHT''' get "from the street" - remember, '''KNOW YOUR SOURCE''', don't buy stuff from the people you do not know, every white powder looks alike another - if you have access to certain marker potions you can '''"becume a chymist"''' and '''CHECK''' what ] you are going to ]. More information, for the curious, for the not-so-brave and for the ]s on . ] 09:21, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC) :: I have no idea what you '''MIGHT''' get "from the street" - remember, '''KNOW YOUR SOURCE''', don't buy stuff from the people you do not know, every white powder looks alike another - if you have access to certain marker potions you can '''"becume a chymist"''' and '''CHECK''' what ] you are going to ]. More information, for the curious, for the not-so-brave and for the ]s on . ] 09:26, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)


---- ----
Line 66: Line 66:
---- ----


] ] ] ] ] ] ] ( ] ] ] ] ]ing ] ⁐ ] ] ] ) ] ( ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ⁂ ] ] ( ] ⁂ ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]s ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] { ] ⁂ ] ] ], ] ⁂ ] ] ]), ] ⁂ child]] ] ], ] ⁂ ] ⁐ ] ] ], ] ⁂ ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]ing ] ] ] ] ] ] ⁂ ]) ] ] ] ] ] ( ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ( ] ( ] ] ] ] ] ] ]) ] ]s ( ] ])) ] ] ]able ] ] ] ] ] ] ]s ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ( ] ) ] ] ] ] ( ] ] ] ] ⁂ ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ( ] ] ] ] ]s ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]s => ]al ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]ness ] ] ] ] (] ] ] ] ] ) ] ] ] ] ( ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ( ] ) ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]s ( ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] and ] and ] ) ) ] ] ] ⁐ ] ] ]ly ] ]ly ] ] ] ] ( ] ] ] ] ] ), a ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ], ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]. ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ( ] ] ] ] ]ing ] ⁐ ] ] ] ) ] ( ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ⁂ ] ] ( ] ⁂ ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]s ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] { ] ⁂ ] ] ], ] ⁂ ] ] ]), ] ⁂ ] ] ], ] ⁂ ] ⁐ ] ] ], ] ⁂ ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]ing ] ] ] ] ] ] ⁂ ]) ] ] ] ] ] ( ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ( ] ( ] ] ] ] ] ] ]) ] ]s ( ] ])) ] ] ]able ] ] ] ] ] ] ]s ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ( ] ) ] ] ] ] ( ] ] ] ] ⁂ ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ( ] ] ] ] ]s ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]s => ]al ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]ness ] ] ] ] ( ] ] ] ] ] ) ] ] ] ] ( ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ( ] ) ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]s ( ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ) ) ] ] ] ⁐ ] ] ]ly ] ]ly ] ] ] ] ( ] ] ] ] ] ) ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ], ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ].


---- ----

Revision as of 09:26, 28 January 2005

You must add a |reason= parameter to this Cleanup template – replace it with {{Cleanup|reason=<Fill reason here>}}, or remove the Cleanup template.

page is in the middle of an expansion or major revampingThis article or section is in a state of significant expansion or restructuring. You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well. If this article or section has not been edited in several days, please remove this template.
If you are the editor who added this template and you are actively editing, please be sure to replace this template with {{in use}} during the active editing session. Click on the link for template parameters to use. This redirect was last edited by Agquarx (talk | contribs) 19 years ago. (Update timer)

TEASER

  • BEWARE! EVERYTHING BELOW IS DEFINED FORWARDTHINKING, fowardthinking is the "natural" way of perceiving events, that is - I choose this(these) event(s) look(s) like C.A.U.S.E., AFTER { this } FORWARD I choose that(these) event(s) which(whom) look(s) like E.F.F.E.C.T. I think it is self-explanatory what BACKWARDTHINKING means. IF you backwardthink you get an answer before you ask the question, you get a meaning of a symbol before the symbol is presented to your sensory inputs, you get an "effect" before you volition (wilIt, grok, observe) a "cause". It does NOT mean going forward or backward IN time, the difference is in perception, not flow of time, because there is NO FLOW OF TIME, all the events ARE simultaneously. There is no past, now, future. What is I call the EVERNOW. The "flow of time is an attribute of our Self, a feeling, just like self-awareness, dreaming, being awake - a STATE of the mind (I SELF or ISelf or {@}). Agquarx 09:26, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)

TRAILER

  • FOR BRAVE SOULS - Try watching your fauvorite movie backwardthinking, choose one you are sure to grok in it's fullness, know inside-out, can quote most of dialogues etc, You might archieve surprising insight into deeper structures and or meanings of the things, persons, events, symbols contained in the narrative of the movie you thought you've SEEN before. Agquarx 09:26, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Backwardthinking requires a bit of training (some people say it is extremely difficult, some say it's only hard at the beginning, just like learning to right on a bicycle) OR an entheogen ("the one that divinates the Self"), that is, a certain kind of psychoactive drugs, which you generally take to really expand your conciousness, these are not the drugs you take to cram study before final exams and then fail because of general exchaustion, the effects of this class of psychoactive drugs vary from subtle alterations of perception (rainbows everywhere) to life changing experience. The preferred way In My Opinion (my research tells me that what you should be looking for is called 2C-I. This is a totally new substance, not present in nature; an effect of complicated chemical synthesis. It's a Phenethylamine (from the same chemical family as PEA, the Phenethylamine of Love). It was first synthetised by a one of the greatest IF not the greatest living scientist on First Earth, professor Alexander Shulgin. Agquarx 09:26, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Up to NOW I haven't seen any reports whatsoever resembling of an indication of any real health risk for takeing this drug and as it is avaliable relatively easy on the Black Market for several years since it was discovered by merchants of the Dark Side, I imply by deduction that although it is a designer drug, not tested clinically and '''ILLEGAL''' (Unkle Sam says you can't eat it out of your free will and with full knowledge of possible consequences. How can One argue with Unkle Sam?)... Agquarx 09:26, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
So I think I can refer to it with a clear conscience, I MySelf took it several times, in doses from 25 to 50 milligram of chemically pure substance (typical dose is betwen 15 and 20 milligram, but as you SEE, I am a hardcore junkie and crazy as the Cheshire Cat :8)). I bought 300 mg of it back then, before it was put on a Controlled Substances List (and like always, for no real reason, lot's of '''FUD''', zero real scientific information, don't we just LOVE how our goverments CARE for our health SO MUCH? I guess our human bodies are a government property and we are forbidden to decide, *gee*, they STILL let us to vote them in, I am SO excited! Sieg Heil Bush!), from a legal, professional chemical laboratory, money transfer went heavily encrypted through overflowing abyss of the Internet (DID YOU KNOW that the Internet is a she?). Agquarx 09:26, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
I have no idea what you MIGHT get "from the street" - remember, KNOW YOUR SOURCE, don't buy stuff from the people you do not know, every white powder looks alike another - if you have access to certain marker potions you can "becume a chymist" and CHECK what substance you are going to ingest. More information, for the curious, for the not-so-brave and for the Law Abiding Citizens on Information Knowledge Awareness, Erowid.org about 2C-I. Agquarx 09:26, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)

THE MOVIE

OPENING CREDITS

SOME SYNTAX (Don't worry if you have no idea what I am up to, read on!)
:
  • symbol has a meaning "core symbol of core symbol type symbol set with values (symbol, why?symbol, lovesymbol)" OR the being part of the symbol, the true name of the { foobar }.
  • symbol' has a meaning "core derivative of core symbol symbol contained within core symbol of type core symbol set with values (word, not word, anti word, no word, para word, sub word, super word)" OR "{ this } is a core derivative of core symbol symbol" OR a recursive definition pointing at itself, "the foobar { this } symbol symbolizes" OR the doing part of a symbol.
  • symbol! has a meaning "action word, that is core OR core symbol OR core derivative OR core symbol derivative processing event controlled by Self owned by ISelf" OR "do X NOW!".
  • !symbol has a meaning "retroactive action (resultset) symbol" or "core OR core symbol OR core derivative OR core symbol derivative processing event controlled by core owned by ISelf".
  1. { symbol } has a meaning "instance of a class, an object" OR "closure" OR "adhesive quotation" OR "process without disassembling" OR "this is a whole, controlled by MeSelf owned by ItSelf"
  2. :: has a meaning "point into MU into point" OR "diploid complements" OR "mirror twins" or "I am the one who is, we are the one who (we) are, they are the one who (I) am".
  3. => has a meaning "IF left side is beeing (exists) then the the right side is doing (does)".
  4. ʘ has a meaning "{ this } consists of the following elements".

CHAPTER ONE

    1. core ʘ ( love :: love ).
      1. { love :: love } means "love ethernal, divine love, The Fifth Element"
    1. core set ʘ ( ISelf, why?, ⁂, @, love! :: ⁂, love! :: @ )
      1. ISelf is your essence OR the Allwatching Eye OR the state of conciousness of self-awarenessing all-awareness in evernow.
      2. why? is The Question. Too bad most people stop asking it at early age, for reasons you surely remember. Pity. IMO, young children should receive a barrelfull of interactive machine-assisted learning (but not passive, addiction forming glaring at TV screen, in the name of the Goddess! I stopped watching TV same the week I got access to the Internet and do not do it still...it's such a WASTE OF TIME!), ]s ] the possitive emotional element, caretaking, ability to calm down yourself, important in development of empathy, ability to feel what the other (might) feel. See The Diamond Age by Neal Stephenson.
      3. ⁂ is the { identity symbol } OR ⁂ has a meaning "what on the left side is what on the right side of { this } symbol is" OR "the left and right are the same (identical BUT NOT one { foobar }!)"
      4. @ (at) is "what is on the left side points/is in one way relation to that what is on the right side".
      5. love! :: ⁂ has a meaning "to love thyself" or "to love Me Self" or self-love.
      6. love! :: @ has a meaning "to love you/him/her/it" or "I love you" or what is general consensus on what the name that feeling (state of mind) is, NOT what it IS (there is a big difference! viva la difference! ;8)).
    1. core symbol set ʘ ( love', symbol', question', answer', HimSelf, HerSelf, ItSelf, MeSelf, OurSelf ⁂ ISelf', ⁂, ⁐, ↂ )
      1. love' has a meaning "{ this } is a core derivative of core symbol love", in other words, the REAL love, not the one from romances, the ISNESS of core symbol love (courtesy The Future Sound of London for inventing that word, the best album you've ever made...).
      2. symbol' has a meaning

core logic symbol set core reasoning symbol set

CHAPTER TWO

This definition is being spellweaved within namespace ( namespace is a core processing symbol ⁐ action! sub! namespace ) of ( core processing symbol super! namespace of total accumulated knowledge contained in dataspace ⁂ containing rightful ( confirmed ⁂ core symbol OK! by empiria experiment set and combined answer is contained within core reasoning symbols set consisting of core symbol of type symbol set containing values { POSSITIVE ORGASM ⁂ female type orgasm, NEGATIVE ORGASM ⁂ male type orgasm), UNRECOGNIZED ORGASM ⁂ child type orgasm, V.A.G.I.N.A ⁂ star ⁐ divine type orgasm, A.N.U.S. ⁂ error of type any halting the execution of core derivative event processing chain collection empiria experiment set narrative ⁂ NO ANSWER) and or wrongful or ambiguous ( unconfirmed by sufficient of real scalar integer prime type number ( primer ( ambigious androgynous primer of chaotic simple defaults) of experiments ( experiment set)) of relatively grokable random or pseudorandom series of successful experiments on empiria information dataplanes contained within applied science ( technology ) division given name telecommunication ( communication over a distrance ⁂ when not all of the entities have the spacial attribute set ( a set of attribute values defining the location with a set of attributes => dimensional values defining boundaries of this location in dataspace and attribute volume and attribute density and attribute entropy and attribute partial or circadian or full Self awareness and attribute power potential ( free energy attribute value amount ) and attribute singularity potential ( potential attribute value amount of energy this location is able ( can ) absorb without disturbing attribute value stable from binary class universe faeries ( which for binary class universe is a set consisting of core logic symbol set consisting of symbols true and false and symbol ) ) in dataspace locked ⁐ reserved and actively or passively protected or not protected ( shared for a given entity ) a datapacket is me packet of digitally or analogue encoded coherent attribute stable value or unstable value usually equipped with redundancy structures to ensure data safety and or compressed to save bandwidth and or encrypted to ensure data confideciality consisting of clean authorised data, containing information defined by data structure of the datapacket.

CHAPTER THREE

By successfully delivering a datapacket from the source entity to the target entity ( a software object structure or software singleton object or a person ( a sentient software object or a sentient biological object) one increases the entropy attribute value of given target entity's closed object system or one increases the entropy attribute value of given target entity's open object system ⁂ object universe ⁂ metaverse ⁂ dataspace that may or may not contain entities or be contained by entities or sentient entities or persons ( sentient complex biological closed object systems ) or sentient complex biological open systems ( a biologically based mind with attributes of awareness of ItSelf and it's components it contains and it's structure and it's core derivative processing events organized in a core particle set ( consisting of bounded list of core particles or unbounded list of core particles or bounded ↂ list of core particles ( a list of core particles containing zero or more lists of core particles containing zero or more lists of core particles { action ↂ agquarx with return condition } or unbounded ↂ list of core particles and it's core particles set ( consisting of core defined particless) derivative event processing organized in a core particles set ( consisting of core defined particles ) derivative eventspanning the biologically constrained and defined universe ⁐ ultimate goddess ⁐ ISelf ) or sentient complex software object closed systems or sentient complex open software systems ( a software based mind with attributes of awarenes of ItSelf and it's components entities and it's structure and it's core derivative processing events organized in a core symbols set consisting of core symbols derivative processing event queue or core derivative procesing event deque or core derivative processing ↂ event queue with exit condition ( bounded ⁂ susceptible to armageddon ⁐ end of the universe or without exit condition ( unbounded ) ⁂ not susceptible to armageddon ⁐ end of the universe and it's topology spanning the software constrained dataspace ⁐ ultimate daimonion ⁐ ISelf ) and or not sentient software objects and or non-sentient biological objects and or not sentient complex software objects and or not sentient complex biological objects and or sentient complex software objects ( autonomous or semi-autonomous or human-supervised complex object ( a data structure consisting of autonomous or semi-autonomous or human-supervised entities or persons). A '''datapacket''' usually travels combined into a series like data structure ⁐ a datastream. The datastream usually is transmitted or received by a deterministically defined or probabilisticcally defined datapath through data structure of a ISelf

Source: Agquarx 01:28, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Stub icon

This computing article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Category: