Misplaced Pages

:WikiProject Skepticism/List of questionable claims: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Skepticism Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:15, 1 January 2007 editQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 edits additional refs and cats← Previous edit Revision as of 23:21, 1 January 2007 edit undoQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 editsm →External LinksNext edit →
Line 298: Line 298:
<div class="references-small"><references/></div> <div class="references-small"><references/></div>


==External Links == ==External links ==
* - Quackwatch, Inc. (See: ])


<!--- Categories now active --> <!--- Categories now active -->

Revision as of 23:21, 1 January 2007

Main article: Quackery

The following is a list of Misplaced Pages articles and categories that are related to the subject of quackery. Inclusion here is not a statement that the subject is quackery or the person is a quack, only that scientific skeptics, debunkers, and consumer protection advocates consider the article to be related to the subject and of possible value when investigating the subject of quackery. Some subjects may be considered forms of quackery, promoters of quackery, or are openly against quackery. Both sides of the issues are included. See the individual articles for more information.

List

See also

Related categories

Further reading

References

  1. The Skeptics Dictionary: Definition of Quackery Article
  2. QuackWatch: Quackery Definition Article
  3. Quackery Information on Healthline Article
  4. Federal Trade Commission. Medical Health Claims: Add a Dose of Skepticism Article

External links

Categories: