Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Sir William Stanier School: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:49, 15 September 2020 editRet.Prof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers15,357 edits →Sir William Stanier School: An educational institute should not be deleted.← Previous edit Revision as of 04:27, 16 September 2020 edit undoAafi (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Rollbackers39,874 edits deleteNext edit →
Line 16: Line 16:
*'''Keep''' An educational institute must not be deleted. There are a number of schools articles on Misplaced Pages which are not even referenced a single resource but passes notability. ] (]) 08:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC) *'''Keep''' An educational institute must not be deleted. There are a number of schools articles on Misplaced Pages which are not even referenced a single resource but passes notability. ] (]) 08:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
*'''Keep:''' Agreed! An educational institute should not be deleted. - ] (]) 14:49, 15 September 2020 (UTC) *'''Keep:''' Agreed! An educational institute should not be deleted. - ] (]) 14:49, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' Schools are not inherently notable. They need to pass GNG and {{u|Priyanjali singh}} such articles often get unnoticed, and "they do not pass notability". You should try ] regarding such schools, and if you find ], then source the article - otherwise get them AfDed. Misplaced Pages is not a directory. ] says it clearly that "At one time, secondary schools were assumed notable unless sources could not be found to prove existence, but following a February 2017 RFC, secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist, and are still subject to WP:N and WP:ORG.". Now that's 3 years before. A school, "secondary school" failing GNG doesn't deserve a place here. <nowiki> ─ </nowiki> ] (<sup>]</sup>) 04:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:27, 16 September 2020

Sir William Stanier School

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Sir William Stanier School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can’t find anything that suggests notability, fails WP:GNG. Devokewater (talk) 20:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Devokewater (talk) 20:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Devokewater (talk) 20:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Devokewater (talk) 20:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Devokewater (talk) 20:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
  • 'Delete' has no reliable source of information. Personal Websites are not reliable source of informationAuthor Sanju (talk) 01:50, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep. There are plenty of sources, just as there are for any secondary school in the United Kingdom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:46, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep: As per the above, there are plenty of references available, esp. in Google News. --Whiteguru (talk) 12:45, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Comment Actually WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES#3 confirms that Secondary schools are no longer assumed as notable without refs, as per any WP:ORG. I would argue that the Chronicle article is WP:Basic enough to show notability of the schools origins - there is plenty more news stories, especially about poor attainment and being in requiring improvement since 2016 - WP:Before - I therefore would say Keep with work.Davidstewartharvey (talk) 14:52, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep An educational institute must not be deleted. There are a number of schools articles on Misplaced Pages which are not even referenced a single resource but passes notability. Priyanjali singh (talk) 08:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep: Agreed! An educational institute should not be deleted. - Ret.Prof (talk) 14:49, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete Schools are not inherently notable. They need to pass GNG and Priyanjali singh such articles often get unnoticed, and "they do not pass notability". You should try WP:BEFORE regarding such schools, and if you find significant coverage, then source the article - otherwise get them AfDed. Misplaced Pages is not a directory. WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES says it clearly that "At one time, secondary schools were assumed notable unless sources could not be found to prove existence, but following a February 2017 RFC, secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist, and are still subject to WP:N and WP:ORG.". Now that's 3 years before. A school, "secondary school" failing GNG doesn't deserve a place here. ─ The Aafī () 04:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Categories: