Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Sir William Stanier School: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:20, 19 September 2020 editTimothyBlue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users38,395 edits Vote via XFD voting tool← Previous edit Revision as of 00:25, 19 September 2020 edit undoTimothyBlue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users38,395 edits →Sir William Stanier School: ceNext edit →
Line 17: Line 17:
*'''Keep:''' Agreed! An educational institute should not be deleted. - ] (]) 14:49, 15 September 2020 (UTC) *'''Keep:''' Agreed! An educational institute should not be deleted. - ] (]) 14:49, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' Schools are not inherently notable. They need to pass GNG and {{u|Priyanjali singh}} such articles often get unnoticed, and "they do not pass notability". You should try ] regarding such schools, and if you find ], then source the article - otherwise get them AfDed. Misplaced Pages is not a directory. ] says it clearly that "At one time, secondary schools were assumed notable unless sources could not be found to prove existence, but following a February 2017 RFC, secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist, and are still subject to WP:N and WP:ORG.". Now that's 3 years before. A school, "secondary school" failing GNG doesn't deserve a place here. <nowiki> ─ </nowiki> ] (<sup>]</sup>) 04:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC) * '''Delete''' Schools are not inherently notable. They need to pass GNG and {{u|Priyanjali singh}} such articles often get unnoticed, and "they do not pass notability". You should try ] regarding such schools, and if you find ], then source the article - otherwise get them AfDed. Misplaced Pages is not a directory. ] says it clearly that "At one time, secondary schools were assumed notable unless sources could not be found to prove existence, but following a February 2017 RFC, secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist, and are still subject to WP:N and WP:ORG.". Now that's 3 years before. A school, "secondary school" failing GNG doesn't deserve a place here. <nowiki> ─ </nowiki> ] (<sup>]</sup>) 04:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
* '''Delete''': Article does not pass GNG or NORG. Sources in the article do not establish notability and BEFORE showed only routine, run of the mill coverage. Secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist. <span style="font-family:Courier New, Courier, monospace;"><strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;//&nbsp;]&nbsp;::&nbsp;</strong>]&nbsp;</span> 00:20, 19 September 2020 (UTC) <!--VCB TimothyBlue--> * '''Delete''': Article does not pass GNG or NORG. Sources in the article do not establish notability and BEFORE showed only routine, run of the mill coverage. Secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist. The Keep votes above simply state references exist, but fail to provide any at all, or explain why the school is notable. The lack of providing sources above shows the sources do not exist, if they did they would be listed especially if there were ''plenty'' as is claimed. <span style="font-family:Courier New, Courier, monospace;"><strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;//&nbsp;]&nbsp;::&nbsp;</strong>]&nbsp;</span> 00:20, 19 September 2020 (UTC) <!--VCB TimothyBlue-->

Revision as of 00:25, 19 September 2020

Sir William Stanier School

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Sir William Stanier School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can’t find anything that suggests notability, fails WP:GNG. Devokewater (talk) 20:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Devokewater (talk) 20:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Devokewater (talk) 20:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Devokewater (talk) 20:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Devokewater (talk) 20:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
  • 'Delete' has no reliable source of information. Personal Websites are not reliable source of informationAuthor Sanju (talk) 01:50, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep. There are plenty of sources, just as there are for any secondary school in the United Kingdom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:46, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep: As per the above, there are plenty of references available, esp. in Google News. --Whiteguru (talk) 12:45, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Comment Actually WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES#3 confirms that Secondary schools are no longer assumed as notable without refs, as per any WP:ORG. I would argue that the Chronicle article is WP:Basic enough to show notability of the schools origins - there is plenty more news stories, especially about poor attainment and being in requiring improvement since 2016 - WP:Before - I therefore would say Keep with work.Davidstewartharvey (talk) 14:52, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep An educational institute must not be deleted. There are a number of schools articles on Misplaced Pages which are not even referenced a single resource but passes notability. Priyanjali singh (talk) 08:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep: Agreed! An educational institute should not be deleted. - Ret.Prof (talk) 14:49, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete Schools are not inherently notable. They need to pass GNG and Priyanjali singh such articles often get unnoticed, and "they do not pass notability". You should try WP:BEFORE regarding such schools, and if you find significant coverage, then source the article - otherwise get them AfDed. Misplaced Pages is not a directory. WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES says it clearly that "At one time, secondary schools were assumed notable unless sources could not be found to prove existence, but following a February 2017 RFC, secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist, and are still subject to WP:N and WP:ORG.". Now that's 3 years before. A school, "secondary school" failing GNG doesn't deserve a place here. ─ The Aafī () 04:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete: Article does not pass GNG or NORG. Sources in the article do not establish notability and BEFORE showed only routine, run of the mill coverage. Secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist. The Keep votes above simply state references exist, but fail to provide any at all, or explain why the school is notable. The lack of providing sources above shows the sources do not exist, if they did they would be listed especially if there were plenty as is claimed.   // Timothy :: talk  00:20, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Categories: