| Revision as of 23:04, 4 January 2007 editQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 edits →Vote← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:04, 6 January 2007 edit undoStrafrechtler~enwiki (talk | contribs)24 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| For the record I changed my vote to ''move to project namespace'' to save the 'list'. Please reconsider your vote. Thanks. --] 21:00, 4 January 2007 (UTC) | For the record I changed my vote to ''move to project namespace'' to save the 'list'. Please reconsider your vote. Thanks. --] 21:00, 4 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :You voted to '''keep''' the "list of articles related to quackery" but we do not have enough votes. So your vote won't count towards anything. Now, our only option is to vote for '''move to project namespace''' as a development project. Thanks. --] 23:04, 4 January 2007 (UTC) | :You voted to '''keep''' the "list of articles related to quackery" but we do not have enough votes. So your vote won't count towards anything. Now, our only option is to vote for '''move to project namespace''' as a development project. Thanks. --] 23:04, 4 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Kramnik played weakly? == | |||
| I just wanted to add, that the result of the match can not be considered as being an overwhelming victory for the chess engine. In German media (I don't have any usable citation) there were remarks, that Kramnik didn't play with the concentration and the commitment like he used to do it in his championship match againt Topalow. Commenting every single move is not the intention of this article, but I think, that a blunder like this is a good example for my doubts, that he took that all really seriously. Remove it, if you think this shouldn't be mentioned. Bye... ] 14:04, 6 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:04, 6 January 2007
Note: If you leave a message for me here, I will probably respond here, unless you ask for a response on your talk page.SVG??
Is it possible to upload SVG files, and have wiki automatically convert it on the fly to png? If so how do I do this, when I tried to upload an SVG it said it was not a recommended format, I did not see a way to force it to go. I noticed in the uploaded files area you have a couple that are .svg.png. Also, could you please resond on my talk page? Thanks. --Green-Dragon 06:31, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Vote
For the record I changed my vote to move to project namespace to save the 'list'. Please reconsider your vote. Thanks. --QuackGuru 21:00, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- You voted to keep the "list of articles related to quackery" but we do not have enough votes. So your vote won't count towards anything. Now, our only option is to vote for move to project namespace as a development project. Thanks. --QuackGuru 23:04, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Kramnik played weakly?
I just wanted to add, that the result of the match can not be considered as being an overwhelming victory for the chess engine. In German media (I don't have any usable citation) there were remarks, that Kramnik didn't play with the concentration and the commitment like he used to do it in his championship match againt Topalow. Commenting every single move is not the intention of this article, but I think, that a blunder like this is a good example for my doubts, that he took that all really seriously. Remove it, if you think this shouldn't be mentioned. Bye... Strafrechtler 14:04, 6 January 2007 (UTC)