Misplaced Pages

Talk:Anti-competitive practices: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:39, 23 November 2020 editGenQuest (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers63,602 edits Assessment (C): banner shell, Economics, Business, Law (Rater)← Previous edit Revision as of 14:34, 16 October 2022 edit undoENSOsurfer (talk | contribs)32 edits Second half of this article completely lacks citations: new sectionTag: New topicNext edit →
Line 22: Line 22:


Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 14:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC) Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 14:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

== Second half of this article completely lacks citations ==

From about the 3rd paragraph of "Effects right down to the end of the article, there are no citations.
The last two sections in particular, contain highly dubious statements with nothing to back them up.] (]) 14:34, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:34, 16 October 2022

The contents of the Unfair competition page were merged into Anti-competitive practices on 21 August 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconEconomics High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconBusiness High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconLaw Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lack of sources

This article currently is not properly sourced but it is formatted much like a list, and the items on this page are often sourced as anti-competitive practices. This is a useful article. Blue Rasberry (talk) 01:48, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anti-competitive practices. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Second half of this article completely lacks citations

From about the 3rd paragraph of "Effects right down to the end of the article, there are no citations. The last two sections in particular, contain highly dubious statements with nothing to back them up.ENSOsurfer (talk) 14:34, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Categories: