Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
:As regards ], two images which I have tagged have subsequently been deleted, which would suggest that my edits were correct. I could of course contact an administrator instead of interacting with the user directly (like i did ). I am also not the only one to have issues with ], see for instance ] or the . --] 16:26, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
:As regards ], two images which I have tagged have subsequently been deleted, which would suggest that my edits were correct. I could of course contact an administrator instead of interacting with the user directly (like i did ). I am also not the only one to have issues with ], see for instance ] or the . --] 16:26, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
In other words, because someone had enough of an issue with the user as to lodge an RFC, you are justified in having "issues" with him? It seems to me that you are essentially admitting to targeting that user's image uploads because you dislike him. That is inappropriate behavior. Let it go and concentrate on issues, not people. If you cannot work out your "issues," then it's best to just look elsewhere: it's a very big project. ] 18:55, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 3 days are automatically archived to User talk:Oden/Archive 3. Sections without timestamps are not archived.
Hi there; actually, there is no sense to consider the above image of restricted copyright, since it was painted in the XIX century. The Imperial Museum of Petropolis cannot hold the copyright of it - the author died more than 70 years ago. I do not know how to proceed anyway, since this "fair use" is nonsense. Thanks. --Tonyjeff17:19, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello, question from a newbie about fair use pictures
Hello, I saw your edit to Sonia Vergara. Fair use really trips me. I am working on ten projects I want to post in the next. Here are links to two: Image: Image:Sabor latino 3.jpg and Image:Voz voto 3.jpg. What would you think of them? The other question I have is: if I were to take a picture of their building with its logo would I and Misplaced Pages have free use to the picture. I have gone back and forth on those question. I'd like a media savvy opinion from you if you don't mind (and yes, I have read the articles on fair use). I just keep tripping up myself saying yes, no, yes, no etc. Thanks, Ronbo7621:32, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
But I know my way around with copyrights...roughly, I must say you have chosen one hell of a task for yourself... Anyway its Russian Christmas right now...So take no offense from me.--Kuban Cossack00:34, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Its not you, but after User:Lupo's merciless crusade against Soviet PD image licensing in the commons and in here, we are naturally defensive of any attacks, even minor ones...So I do apologise for the rough remarks thrown at you by me...--Kuban Cossack00:45, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
I understand that you have taken upon yourself a war on inappropriate fair use rationales, but you appear to have targeted images uploaded by some users more than others and to have received warnings over this in the past. Please extend good faith toward users such as user:Irpen and do not seek conflict by going through their contributions to tag their images. Given past questions with images he or she uploaded being fully answered, you should be turning your attention elsewhere. Paying undue attention to users with whom you have been in conflict can become a matter of stalking, and therefore a matter for Arbitration. If you are in conflict with user:Irpen, please consider mediation. If not, then extend that effort effort and try to communicate with the user before you apply a dispute tag on images he has uploaded. You can always ask people first and listen to what they say. Geogre14:14, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
The term "war" would suggest an antagonistic approach, I would rather prefer the term cleanup or maintenance. I would also object to the statement that I target specific users, when I find a questionable image (such as this diff or this page history) I review the upload logs of any editor which appears in the page history.
In other words, because someone had enough of an issue with the user as to lodge an RFC, you are justified in having "issues" with him? It seems to me that you are essentially admitting to targeting that user's image uploads because you dislike him. That is inappropriate behavior. Let it go and concentrate on issues, not people. If you cannot work out your "issues," then it's best to just look elsewhere: it's a very big project. Geogre18:55, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
