| Revision as of 14:16, 17 December 2020 editHmlarson (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,281 edits k← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:56, 19 December 2020 edit undoBeyond My Ken (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers263,285 edits →Laura DemingNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| *'''Keep''' At Misplaced Pages, we could wait until a person is dead and then start with their obituaries, covering their entire life. We wouldn't have BLP problems then but the subject here might upset such a scheme, eh? She gets plenty of coverage in sources such as the '''' and '''' and it's not just about money. ]🐉(]) 10:57, 17 December 2020 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' At Misplaced Pages, we could wait until a person is dead and then start with their obituaries, covering their entire life. We wouldn't have BLP problems then but the subject here might upset such a scheme, eh? She gets plenty of coverage in sources such as the '''' and '''' and it's not just about money. ]🐉(]) 10:57, 17 December 2020 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' per ]. Per cited ] lead, "For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should be 'worthy of notice' or 'note'—that is, remarkable' or 'significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded'. Woman venture capitalist marks all of those. ] (]) 14:16, 17 December 2020 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' per ]. Per cited ] lead, "For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should be 'worthy of notice' or 'note'—that is, remarkable' or 'significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded'. Woman venture capitalist marks all of those. ] (]) 14:16, 17 December 2020 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' - Handily passes GNG. ] (]) 04:56, 19 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:56, 19 December 2020
Laura Deming
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Laura Deming (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another person with a job article that does not meet the criteria of WP:BIO. She's been profiled a few times as an investor, and that's really it. At best, WP:TOOSOON. FalconK (talk) 22:43, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 22:43, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 22:43, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 22:43, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:47, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep At Misplaced Pages, we could wait until a person is dead and then start with their obituaries, covering their entire life. We wouldn't have BLP problems then but the subject here might upset such a scheme, eh? She gets plenty of coverage in sources such as the FT and Sunday Times and it's not just about money. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:57, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GNG. Per cited WP:BIO lead, "For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should be 'worthy of notice' or 'note'—that is, remarkable' or 'significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded'. Woman venture capitalist marks all of those. Forbes ref Hmlarson (talk) 14:16, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Handily passes GNG. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:56, 19 December 2020 (UTC)