Revision as of 06:41, 9 January 2007 editGeo Swan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers112,843 edits revert unexplained edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:53, 10 January 2007 edit undoAbrar47 (talk | contribs)312 edits →big unexplained editsNext edit → | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I think this article should also mention Sirhindi's view toward to non-Muslims and Akbar's "Din-e-Ilahi". ] | I think this article should also mention Sirhindi's view toward to non-Muslims and Akbar's "Din-e-Ilahi". ] | ||
==Big un related addings == | |||
I have edited that article with this big un explained adding to Ahmad Sirhandi's page but this user still trying to create chaos inside of nothingness by just reverting that article to this unrelated material i need your attention to please check wether this material is worth adding to this article or not vote for it on his discussion page. | |||
Abrar Ahmed 07:53, 10 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
== big unexplained edits == | == big unexplained edits == |
Revision as of 07:53, 10 January 2007
India Stub‑class | |||||||||||||
|
Hello All! As my first project I'm currently working on knowledge about İmam Rabbani (or Ahmad Sirhindi as called here) I shall put together a completeley wikipedia-true article with references and links to webpages. I'll try to finish this as soon as I can. I'm open to any kind of suggestions on this matter. --Suleyman Habeeb 19:03, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
I think this article should also mention Sirhindi's view toward to non-Muslims and Akbar's "Din-e-Ilahi". User:Jatt06
Big un related addings
I have edited that article with this big un explained adding to Ahmad Sirhandi's page but this user still trying to create chaos inside of nothingness by just reverting that article to this unrelated material i need your attention to please check wether this material is worth adding to this article or not vote for it on his discussion page. Abrar Ahmed 07:53, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
big unexplained edits
Another contributor made a huge unexplained excision to this article. I left a suggestion on their talk page] that they should consider putting an explanation on the associated talk page any time they made an excision that large. They left a reply on my talk page that seemed to indicate an unwillingness to be cooperative and respectful to others, and that they felt no obligation to explain themselves. They said they suspected I knew nothing about Ahmad Sirhindi. That's true. I don't. But I know that huge excisions like this must be explained, no matter what the topic. So, I reverted it.
Cheers! -- Geo Swan 06:41, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Categories: