| Revision as of 18:59, 10 January 2007 editCertified Gangsta (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,106 edits →Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:05, 10 January 2007 edit undoGuardian Tiger (talk | contribs)893 edits →Reply: reply to accusationsNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| Thanks for the encouraging words. If you have a growing suspicion, which is obvious since the user's edit pattern and behaviors are so similar, please file a checkuser. I just don't have the time myself. A good place to start is ] where all 4 users are extremely zealous in editing and had gotten into numberous content disputes in that particular article. One of the socks ] is ban indefinitely so these new socks are without a doubt ban-evading sockpuppets and should be blocked on sight. Some other common and disrupting pattern this users and his socks do is constantly adding wikiproject: china tag to every single article, stalking my contributions and revert everything I edited, sometimes out of his usual scope (which is making hostile edits about Taiwan and Japan related articles and spreading communist propaganda) ], ] and lots more. If you're interested, feel free to contact me.--] 18:51, 10 January 2007 (UTC) | Thanks for the encouraging words. If you have a growing suspicion, which is obvious since the user's edit pattern and behaviors are so similar, please file a checkuser. I just don't have the time myself. A good place to start is ] where all 4 users are extremely zealous in editing and had gotten into numberous content disputes in that particular article. One of the socks ] is ban indefinitely so these new socks are without a doubt ban-evading sockpuppets and should be blocked on sight. Some other common and disrupting pattern this users and his socks do is constantly adding wikiproject: china tag to every single article, stalking my contributions and revert everything I edited, sometimes out of his usual scope (which is making hostile edits about Taiwan and Japan related articles and spreading communist propaganda) ], ] and lots more. If you're interested, feel free to contact me.--] 18:51, 10 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :There is no evidence of policy violation here, so no rationale for a check other than a hunch. Certified.Gangsta has a history of filing false checkusers as shown in his . {{user|Certified.Gangsta}} is now resorting to censoring and all my comments from his ]. ] 19:05, 10 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:05, 10 January 2007
 | Jumping cheese is currently wikibonked and is operating at a lower edit level than usual. Hitting the wall is a temporary condition, and the user should return to normal edit levels in time. |
|
Wednesday 25 December 03:14 UTC Welcome to Jumping cheese's talk page
on Misplaced Pages, the 💕 that anyone can edit
This page is best viewed in Mozilla Firefox in normal text size
|
 Archives Archived at every 50 discussions. |
|---|
Archives Archived at every 50 discussions. |
|---|
In reply
It could be stated that the content is controversial, however the same could be said for any of the listings under the Love Interests heading. This doesn't mean that it should be deleted, but should instead be marked as such and invited to be discussed on the Discussion page. Because this is a user edited encyclopedia, there is always information based entirely on speculation, or controversial information. When it's known that it is controversial, it should be marked as such, and not simply removed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Triaxx2 (talk • contribs) 03:19, 24 December 2006 (UTC).
Image:The All-American Rejects.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:The All-American Rejects.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShadowHalo 09:54, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstars!!
Hi Jumping cheese!
Thanks a lot for the barnstars, glad you liked my userpage! I only wish wikipedia allowed flash file uploads - then I'd really make a good userpage! But nah, your page isn't that bad! Btw - did you like the talk page archive thingy? Only just recently added it --Fir0002 22:29, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Reply
Thanks for the encouraging words. If you have a growing suspicion, which is obvious since the user's edit pattern and behaviors are so similar, please file a checkuser. I just don't have the time myself. A good place to start is Bruce Lee where all 4 users are extremely zealous in editing and had gotten into numberous content disputes in that particular article. One of the socks User:RaGnaRoK SepHír0tH is ban indefinitely so these new socks are without a doubt ban-evading sockpuppets and should be blocked on sight. Some other common and disrupting pattern this users and his socks do is constantly adding wikiproject: china tag to every single article, stalking my contributions and revert everything I edited, sometimes out of his usual scope (which is making hostile edits about Taiwan and Japan related articles and spreading communist propaganda) ], ] and lots more. If you're interested, feel free to contact me.--Certified.Gangsta 18:51, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- There is no evidence of policy violation here, so no rationale for a check other than a hunch. Certified.Gangsta has a history of filing false checkusers as shown in his contributions. Certified.Gangsta (talk · contribs) is now resorting to censoring and deleting all my comments from his talk page. Guardian Tiger 19:05, 10 January 2007 (UTC)