| Revision as of 03:01, 14 January 2021 editKautilya3 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers86,470 edits Caution: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on Rajput resistance to Muslim conquests.Tag: Twinkle← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:04, 14 January 2021 edit undoKautilya3 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers86,470 edits →ARBIPA sanctions alert: new sectionTag: contentious topics alertNext edit → | ||
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
| Certain content moderators who are radicals ideologues and have Pro islamists views are not allowing academics/historians to fix the factual errors related Hindu history as well as Indian history. | Certain content moderators who are radicals ideologues and have Pro islamists views are not allowing academics/historians to fix the factual errors related Hindu history as well as Indian history. | ||
| They have been vandalising and deleting factual information on several battles involving Hindu kings & India and pushing pro islamist narrative. ] (]) 15:11, 13 January 2021 (UTC) | They have been vandalising and deleting factual information on several battles involving Hindu kings & India and pushing pro islamist narrative. ] (]) 15:11, 13 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
| == ARBIPA sanctions alert == | |||
| {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
| You have shown interest in ], ], and ]. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
| For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ] (]) 03:04, 14 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:04, 14 January 2021
January 2021
Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you recently removed content from Vaghela dynasty without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. utcursch | talk 20:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Also, have a look at WP:CITELEAD - the article lead is a summary of the content sourced in the article body. Lack of citations in the lead doesn't mean that the lead is unsourced. utcursch | talk 20:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rajput resistance to Muslim conquests, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 03:01, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Friendly Batman, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi Friendly Batman! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm Eyebeller. I noticed that in this edit to Battle of Talikota, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Eyebeller 12:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Should you continue to remove content falsely claiming vandalism I will be reporting you to WP:ANI. FDW777 (talk) 12:31, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
I mentioned that I was fixing vandalism and factual inaccuracies in the article. Please restored my edit. You can fix typos in my edit if you like. Friendly Batman (talk) 12:50, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Comment on vandalism.
I saw factual inaccuracies in the article Balle of Talikota. My edit was reversed in no time. What is the point of having a platform when historians/scholars can't even fix errors? Friendly Batman (talk) 12:36, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- If you have any specific comments, I suggest you raise them at Talk:Battle of Talikota. That you saw fit to add unreferenced content such as
Eaton's analysis is rejected by most historians
andHistorians like Eating and Romila Thapar are accused of dishonest scholarship and normative inversion in this analysis of balle of Talikota
suggests the problem is with your editing. FDW777 (talk) 12:45, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
There were only two spelling errors in my editing that was bcz of typos. The content I edited was factually correct and even supported by many parts of the same article. Restored my edit. You can fix typos if you want. Friendly Batman (talk) 12:47, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- The typos are a secondary, and minor issue. You can reinstate the content if you really think it's a good idea, but if you do you'll be at WP:ANI in short order. FDW777 (talk) 12:51, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
This authoritarian behavior. How would anyone contribute to the information if you guys bully content editors? What you are doing is basically maintaining a political ideological view on the site instead of fact based analysis. Friendly Batman (talk) 12:55, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- No, I'm preventing disruption by an editor intent on adding their own opinions in the place of what appears to be properly referenced content. I repeat my suggestion that you raise specific issues at Talk:Battle of Talikota. FDW777 (talk) 12:57, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
This is horrible. I added fact based content which even the previous form of article had in unorganized manner. You just restored vandalism due to political and ideological inclination and not bcz of fact based analysis. Friendly Batman (talk) 13:00, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- I suggest you read WP:NOTVANDALISM, and refrain from using that term again. FDW777 (talk) 13:04, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Either mention factual inaccuracy in my edit or restored my edit. Don't make this platform a propaganda site. Friendly Batman (talk) 13:15, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
I checked your timeline of edits. You have been vandalizing all the battle pages of Hindu as well as Indian victories. IMO you are some islamist who is vandalizing factual analysis based information/article accroding to your own ideological inclination. Friendly Batman (talk) 13:32, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
ANI
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. FDW777 (talk) 13:49, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Certain content moderators who are radicals ideologues and have Pro islamists views are not allowing academics/historians to fix the factual errors related Hindu history as well as Indian history. They have been vandalising and deleting factual information on several battles involving Hindu kings & India and pushing pro islamist narrative. Friendly Batman (talk) 15:11, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
ARBIPA sanctions alert
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.