| Revision as of 15:58, 13 January 2021 editRet.Prof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers15,357 edits →Dhamakapella← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:12, 14 January 2021 edit undoWhiteguru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers22,156 edits Keep: A cappella genre is challengingNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| ::: Yes, but anyone can submit their album to be reviewed by volunteer reviewers, per the link you sent. If that confers notability I can be a notable singer within three weeks (per the site)! ] (]) 06:22, 13 January 2021 (UTC) | ::: Yes, but anyone can submit their album to be reviewed by volunteer reviewers, per the link you sent. If that confers notability I can be a notable singer within three weeks (per the site)! ] (]) 06:22, 13 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep:''' Point taken but I still think the article is notable within the acapella genre going by the awards won. - ] (]) 15:57, 13 January 2021 (UTC) | *'''Keep:''' Point taken but I still think the article is notable within the acapella genre going by the awards won. - ] (]) 15:57, 13 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep:''' The A cappella genre is challenging; I'll go on the awards won, and say that yes, ] sets the bar high, but sometimes we have to allow groups to just scrape through. --] (]) 09:12, 14 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:12, 14 January 2021
Dhamakapella
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Dhamakapella (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable per WP:GNG and WP:BAND. All cited sources are either self-publications or trivial references. Bestagon (talk) 00:06, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 03:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 03:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Delete: Only found local references in before search (the Observer is the uni newspaper in the same uni where the group are based). Pulisi (talk) 13:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)- Blocked for UPE. MER-C 17:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep seem to be notable within the acapella genre going by the awards won and by the secondary coverage in the reception section, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:49, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note that the reception section is mostly references to either 1) sources published by the university or 2) open online forums. NBAND has a pretty high bar for awards conferring notability (i.e., the Grammy's or the Juno Awards). Bestagon (talk) 02:57, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Most of the reviews are from this site here which seems to be a website with a staff rather than an open online forum, Atlantic306 (talk) 01:18, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, but anyone can submit their album to be reviewed by volunteer reviewers, per the link you sent. If that confers notability I can be a notable singer within three weeks (per the site)! Bestagon (talk) 06:22, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Most of the reviews are from this site here which seems to be a website with a staff rather than an open online forum, Atlantic306 (talk) 01:18, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: Point taken but I still think the article is notable within the acapella genre going by the awards won. - Ret.Prof (talk) 15:57, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: The A cappella genre is challenging; I'll go on the awards won, and say that yes, WP:NBAND sets the bar high, but sometimes we have to allow groups to just scrape through. --Whiteguru (talk) 09:12, 14 January 2021 (UTC)