| Revision as of 00:16, 17 January 2021 editAnonQuixote (talk | contribs)287 edits →Accusation of edit warring: Comment← Previous edit |
Revision as of 00:25, 17 January 2021 edit undoAnonQuixote (talk | contribs)287 edits OneClickArchiver archived Accusation of edit warring to User talk:AnonQuixote/Archive 1Next edit → |
| Line 7: |
Line 7: |
|
}}<!-- 07:11 January 16, 2021 (UTC), AnonQuixote added ] --> |
|
}}<!-- 07:11 January 16, 2021 (UTC), AnonQuixote added ] --> |
|
{{Archives}} |
|
{{Archives}} |
|
|
|
|
==Accusation of edit warring== |
|
|
|
|
|
] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] 06:11, 15 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
:{{replyto|Vincentvikram}} Misplaced Pages has a clear policy that unsourced material must be removed from biographies of living persons. If you want to suggest getting rid of Misplaced Pages's sourcing, BLP, or neutrality policies my talk page is not the right place to do so. ] (]) 06:13, 16 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{u|AnonQuixote}} that is a fast moving page and I dont have the time to go back and check but I did see you revert at least two things multiple times. However, I find your question to me rather a straw man argument. I would suggest looking up logical fallacies. Best! ] 06:20, 16 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
:::If you don't even know what's going on why are you even harassing me? ] (]) 06:22, 16 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::::LOL for the "harassment" phrase. I am aware of what is going on and can see how fast the edits are moving. I just have a day and night job which is outside Misplaced Pages and don't have the time right now to provide diff's. However, if you prefer, I can look it up when I can free myself. Have a great day! ] 06:55, 16 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{u|AnonQuixote}}, also want to note that any controversial page that deals with American Politics after 1932 is subject to 1RR, not 3RR, and discretionary sanctions are available to any admin who feels they are merited. So, edit warring is a really bad idea to do on those pages. ]｟] ]｠ 07:28, 16 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
:::My belief is that removing unsourced, potentially libelous material is a justified exception to revert limits per ]. ] (]) 07:39, 16 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
::::{{u|AnonQuixote}}, that is an exemption, but there is clearly no libel nor unsourced content here. Agree with {{u|Gwennie-nyan}}, you should be mindful of DS. I the alert earlier, so you now meet the ] necessary for sanctions to be imposed. ― ] <sup>]</sup> 07:47, 16 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::Thanks for the veiled threats, but the claim that Trump was charged with sedition is unsourced. ] (]) 00:16, 17 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Deleting others' talk page comments at ] == |
|
== Deleting others' talk page comments at ] == |
