Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 15:52, 12 January 2007

Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. As a member of the Misplaced Pages community, I would like to remind you of Misplaced Pages's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors, which you appear to have violated at Kofi Annan. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Misplaced Pages. Thank you! Sciurinæ 15:05, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. -- Szvest 18:23, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for repeatedly violating Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy. If you wish to make neutral and unbiased contributions, feel free to do so after the block expires. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 15:53, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

NPOV

Please read WP:NPOV. You appear to be a fanatic Litvishe yid. Your edits on Norman Lamm and Shlomo Riskin can be described as vandalism. These rabbonim may not be our type, but they are qualified Orthodox rabbis, like it or not. For YOU to retract their semichah (which is what you were trying to do with your edits) is crazy. I propose that if you want to be so frum, you start by throwing your computer out of the house. Further, your edits to Elazar Shach and Neturei Karta are highly POV and the second is vandalism. I completely agree with PinchasC's blocking of you. --Daniel575 15:55, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Neturei Karta

Misplaced Pages has no discussion board. You are referring to 'terrorists' while others would refer to them as 'anti-Zionist peace activists'. This is an ENCYCLOPEDIA for factual information, not a place for your own political views. Further, if you are DavidCharlesII (talk · contribs), sign in as such. And sign your comments on talk pages with 4 tildes: ~. --Daniel575 | (talk) 19:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Neturei Karta: again

You again vandalized Neturei Karta. You have proven what you are: a fanatic Litvishe yid. You changed "Neturei Karta does not consist of Hasidim, but of Litvish Jews" into "Neturei Karta consists of Hasidim" (not exact, from the head). This is a plain lie, as everybody knows. They are Graniks. You are calling the Gra a Hasid. I think he would be very grateful of you calling him a Hasid, don't you think he would love it? Quit this behavior. This your so so-manieth warning. Quit it now. --Daniel575 | (talk) 18:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

It is not my type to butt in (I did, because this is what appears before I could even log on), but I highly resent your use of "Litvish" as though it some kind of negative adjective. Factually and historically, it cannot be regarded as such. Without the Litvaks you malign, you would not have Torah or mussar. Whatever your political bent may be as a chussid, let us all try to be positive with one another. If you notice, I have been working on myself, too. And my contributions, generally on the discussion pages, have been positive--aiming toward the goal of enhancing Misplaced Pages's services. I took your constructive advice--for which I am profoundly greatful--and I hope you recognize that what I am writing here is in the same spirit.

Second, the Gaon was called a chussid by Litvaks. He still is today. Let us not demonize him. Even the baal HaTanya (I write this because you are a Lubavitcher) wrote out against such behavior.

Respectfully, I remain, DavidCharlesII 19:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

I am not a Lubavitcher. Quite the contrary. I do not identify with anything, but I am close to Dushinsky. That's not quite the same as Lubavitch, hehe. Further, your remark "Without the Litvaks ... you would not have Torah" is also quite intolerent to say the least. The reason for my remark (twice) about this user being Litvish is because, unfortunately, some Litvishe people have an EXTREMELY rigid way of thinking, with no independence or own intellect at all. This is the profile the previous user fits into. Chassidim user their brains a lot more than these Litvaks. For example, as you can see, this user changed "NK are not Chassidim but Litvaks" into "NK are Chassidim". Such things are plain vandalism. Obviously he wrote that because he hates chassidus and wants to blacken chassidim by calling NK 'chassidim', which is plainly not true. They are Graniks. The Gra was not a chossid. If you find out who it is, please give him a very harsh notice that Misplaced Pages is not the Yated. And lastly, I am not demonizing the Gra (ch'v), I am merely noting that this (Litvishe) user was calling the Gra a chossid, by calling NK chassidim. --Daniel575 | (talk) 19:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Chasidim user their brains a lot more than these Litvaks.

I would counter that this is quite intolerant, as well. It is interesting that you fail to see kanoim among Chasidim. You really need examples?

DavidCharlesII 14:15, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

deleted Reb Yoshe Ber Soloveitchik

Given this kanoi's history, it should come to no one's surprise that he also deleted R' Yoshe Ber Soloveitchik ("the Rov") from the Brisk yeshiva page. I could reasonably see someone putting up a discussion about it (which I've addressed on that talk page), but to just go ahead and delete R' Yoshe Ber is going too far. Can we agree that's also in violation of NPOV, please? I think it's only appropriate that this user be blocked. TLMD13 09:34, 1 September 2006 (UTC)TLMD13

You have to be living in dream world to think YU is a Brisker Yeshiva. It was inserted by MO kannoim and removed because it violates NPOV rules.

Postings on article talk pages

Please follow Misplaced Pages:Sign your posts on talk pages and also indent your comments, per Misplaced Pages:Talk page guidelines. It's much more difficult to follow a discussion when these two things aren't done. Thanks. John Broughton | Talk 15:52, 12 January 2007 (UTC)