Revision as of 17:32, 12 January 2007 editNewyorkbrad (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,481 edits →Confirmation: agree with others← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:34, 12 January 2007 edit undoBunchofgrapes (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,802 edits →ConfirmationNext edit → | ||
Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
I agree with Ganymead and ALoan. ] 17:32, 12 January 2007 (UTC) | I agree with Ganymead and ALoan. ] 17:32, 12 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
:I'm not yet committing to quitting writing here -- though right now I wish I could. I'm committing to quitting caring about everything that isn't writing. My watchlist is clear but for this page and ] now. —] (]) 17:34, 12 January 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:34, 12 January 2007
Archive one (to Nov 2005) • two (Nov-Dec) • three (Dec-Jan 2006) • four (Jan-Mar) • five (Mar-Apr) • six (Apr-May) • seven (May-Jun) • eight (Jun-Jul) • nine (Jul) • ten (Jul-Aug) • recall (Aug) • eleven (Aug-Sep) • twelve (Sep) • thirteen; memorial (Sep-Oct) • fourteen (Nov-Jan 2007)
The Lion that Meowed
I'm deeply disturbed that this harassment is still occurring. I may send Eddie an e-mail and see if I can convince him to stop. I really hoped that at one time, Eddie could be a productive member of the rail community on Misplaced Pages, but I suppose I had high expectations. Have you thought about semi-protecting your user and talk pages in the short-term? —Viriditas | Talk 05:48, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- I don't feel harassed, just vandalized. Reverting is easy. Don't stress about it. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 07:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- I would like to see a resolution to this issue. If there is anyway I can help out, please don't hesitate to contact me. —Viriditas | Talk 23:52, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for reverting vandalism to my user talk page!! :D Cheers, Tangotango (talk) 03:34, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Train wreck picture
Hi Bunch, I found it odd that you are having the train wreck picture to decorate your talk page for so long... Your selection of the pictures have been quite good but this one stands out, really. I hope the image does not indicate the state of your mood. --BorgQueen 13:53, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Your psychological guess is correct, really, BQ. I'm still working through life adjustments to the tragedy in September. Plus I always seem to be at least partially entangled in depressing wiki-politics lately. Still, it's time at last for me to archive this page at last, and that's usually a good time to find a new pretty picture with a portrait orientation. Suggestions? —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 17:28, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- How about one of these?: Image:Life Saint-Austremoine Issoire bottom n2.jpg, Image:Muzeum Sułkowskich - Zabytkowy Witraż.jpg, Image:Newtons cradle animation book.gif, Image:William-Adolphe Bouguereau (1825-1905) - At the Edge of the Brook (1875).jpg --BorgQueen 18:02, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- This image is quite nice, too: Image:Falco vespertinus NAUMANN.jpg --BorgQueen 18:04, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- "At the Edge of the Brook" suits my fancy. There's something interesting about it. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 23:06, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
For your work at C:CSD
As you so stated, here is an gold star (ignore the fact it's more orange than yellow) for your fantastic work with C:CSD. I believe you want to stick it on your forehead, so feel free :) Daniel.Bryant 06:10, 9 January 2007 (UTC)At last, the recognition I both so richly deserve and so unabashedly beg for —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 15:46, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Certified.Gangsta (talk · contribs) vandalizing my userpage
Certified.Gangsta (talk · contribs) is repeatedly vandalizing my userpage after the final warning (he deleted the warning). Certified.Gangsta is also censoring and deleting all my comments from his talk page. Could you help put a stop to this? Guardian Tiger 19:09, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- He's not vandalizing your user page; don't call it vandalism. (He thinks he's doing the right thing, thus, it isn't vandalism.) He is however edit warring there for little reason, and I have asked him to stop in my edit summary there. He is free to delete your comments from his talk page. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 19:14, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Certified.Gangsta is making unjustified accusations on his talk page while deleting and censoring ALL my comments. Certified.Gangsta is using his talk pages to attempt to mountain a campaign against me. He is censoring and deleting ALL my comments that refute the accusations. Is there anything that can be done about this? Guardian Tiger 19:29, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- You both appear to be harassing the other. Everybody stop and try to grow up. Stop posting the same message on everybody's page, too. Thanks. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 19:35, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Your block of TheJokerman2247
TheJokerman2247, who you blocked, has made an {{unblock}} request on his talk page. Please respond to it. I don't see a connection between him and EddieSegoura, and I noticed that you didn't seem to comment about this connection anywhere. I think this user deserves to see the highlights of the evidence in this case. Eli Falk 13:12, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- I've provided evidence at User talk:TheJokerman2247. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 15:45, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Tell me something good about Misplaced Pages
Or tell me I should quit. Or better yet, give me tips for how to quit. Thanks! —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 06:02, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Something good? Well, there's always work to do! (Sorry, I couldn't resist...) Best way to quit is to go cold turkey, which I recommend doing once in a while. Everyone needs a break. —Viriditas | Talk 08:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry if you're feeling discouraged. One thing that I find good about the project is that if a particular aspect is temporarily wearying, one can always hop over to a far-removed topic or task; for example, from projectspace to article-writing and back again, or in admins' case, from administration tasks to writing or editing or vice versa. The idea is not to be consumed by the feuds that pop up, or the edit wars, or any of the other annoyances that arise; but to contribute to knowledge, and in the process, to have some fun. But I'm not telling you anything you don't already know, having been here far longer than I have; I appreciated kind words from you on one of the noticeboards at a difficult moment some months ago, and the place can still use you and more like you. Newyorkbrad 10:50, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- I don't think you will leave, because like me no matter how tempted you are not a quitter. There is lots you can do, if you are temporarily tired of writing good pages, you could start a crusade (I have a list of suitable subjects somewhere) failing that you could go an irritate someone, that is pretty popular these days - slap a few templates on here and there (I have a list also of people who IMO need templates slapping on them) you could even make your own template to slap on someone. I bet Brad has never had a template, and would be thrilled to have one -so you see there is much you can do. Start Category: Wikipedians who are pissed off do I need to go on. Anyway if one leaves in my experience one has to log on just as often just to see what people are saying about one - so if you are here you might as well edit - it also has the added advantage of irritating the hell out of people who were glad you left. Except in your case no-one would be glad to see the back of you - so all in all you don't really have a lot of choice but to stay and stick it out - do you? Giano 12:56, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry if you're feeling discouraged. One thing that I find good about the project is that if a particular aspect is temporarily wearying, one can always hop over to a far-removed topic or task; for example, from projectspace to article-writing and back again, or in admins' case, from administration tasks to writing or editing or vice versa. The idea is not to be consumed by the feuds that pop up, or the edit wars, or any of the other annoyances that arise; but to contribute to knowledge, and in the process, to have some fun. But I'm not telling you anything you don't already know, having been here far longer than I have; I appreciated kind words from you on one of the noticeboards at a difficult moment some months ago, and the place can still use you and more like you. Newyorkbrad 10:50, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Good? We are creating a 💕 from the ground up. I think that is pretty amazing.
If you are a feeling bit disillusioned (you are not alone there) then I would echo the comments above about either taking a break to get some fresh air - I am a bit refreshed after 3 weeks off over Christmas and the New Year - or finding something different to do for a change: follow some redlinks and create some new content (see User:ALoan/redlinks for some ideas), or add new material to old articles, or pick a topic in an area that interests you and write a FAC-length article on it, or do a mindless admin task for a while, or update some project pages, or get involved in a new area.
Good luck. -- ALoan (Talk) 13:10, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Someone recently wrote:
- For me, contributing to Misplaced Pages is a noble act. Knowledge is power. We can all feel justifiably proud that the words we are helping to write, will help to empower untold millions of people, all over the world.
The world would be a poorer place without Misplaced Pages, and Misplaced Pages would be a poorer place without you. Paul August ☎ 16:36, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Absolutely agreed. Friday (talk) 16:42, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Redaction from Giano's talk page
Hi Bunchofgrapes,
Regarding this edit, why did you remove it? Read the text at the top of his page, it's obvious that this remains a charged issue. Your removal of my text doesn't make sense, do you assert that there's no way to discuss things with him? Was there a problem with what I wrote? Please help me out here, I'm trying to understand your reasoning. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 16:17, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- I assert there is no way you can discuss things with him. I assert that fact is obvious. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 16:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Why? - CHAIRBOY (☎) 16:21, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
(Pardon the butting in) I thought Chairboy's message was polite and reasonable. If another editor can't abide polite and reasonable communication, that's a real problem, but not with the person being reasonable. Friday (talk) 16:23, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- OK. I quit. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 16:29, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- I wish you wouldn't. In my experience you've been a good editor. (But in my experience, so has Chairboy.) Some issues are more divisive than is healthy. WP:TEA? Friday (talk) 16:31, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
WP:BEER would be more appropriat, as it is POETS day. -- ALoan (Talk) 17:00, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Confirmation
I confirm that I request my sysop access be removed. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 17:04, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- In accordance with your request, your sysop access has been removed: . Bastiq▼e 17:10, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- I'm hanging my flag at half-staff...this is a sad day for this project. *Exeunt* Ganymead | Dialogue? 17:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Oh dear. Please don't leave. We need you.
At the end of the day, the admin bit it is just a mop and a stick, which you can get back any time you want. -- ALoan (Talk) 17:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
I agree with Ganymead and ALoan. Newyorkbrad 17:32, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not yet committing to quitting writing here -- though right now I wish I could. I'm committing to quitting caring about everything that isn't writing. My watchlist is clear but for this page and Popcorn now. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 17:34, 12 January 2007 (UTC)