| Revision as of 00:41, 13 January 2007 editDCincarnate (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,754 edits →Galactus← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:12, 13 January 2007 edit undoAsgardian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,108 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 184: | Line 184: | ||
| I just wanted to say good job on the image. Dont know where you found it but that might be a good place to stay. Lets see if Asgardian has a reason to get rid of it. ] 13:27, 12 January 2007 (UTC) | I just wanted to say good job on the image. Dont know where you found it but that might be a good place to stay. Lets see if Asgardian has a reason to get rid of it. ] 13:27, 12 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == What are you doing? == | |||
| Why are you insisting that an image - which is great and better than the previous version - of Tiamut is placed somewhere that it will only disrupt text? The image can stay, but it needs to be off to the right. Why degrade the article? | |||
Revision as of 22:12, 13 January 2007
Welcome!
Hello, DCincarnate, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
-- Mirage5000 20:55, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging for Image:Scrier.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Scrier.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 01:06, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Trigonwho.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Trigonwho.jpg. Misplaced Pages gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Misplaced Pages, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 20:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Onslaught21.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Onslaught21.jpg. Misplaced Pages gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Misplaced Pages, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 22:12, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
"Vast"
Per the WP:CMC the word is inappropriate for modifying the term "superhuman". Please do not add this to articles. Thanks, Chris Griswold (☎☓) 23:35, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- Repeating what ChrisHriswold said. HalJor 18:09, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Ares314ou.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ares314ou.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 18:39, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Superman-cape-clouds1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Superman-cape-clouds1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 08:51, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Living Tribunal
I have just discovered that an edit you made about a month ago was copied word for word from another website. In case you aren't aware, this is a very bad thing. Please don't copy the work of other websites onto Misplaced Pages. 08:55, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Apocalypse01.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Apocalypse01.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Misplaced Pages and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:56, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Image tagging for Image:AnimatedEvolutionary.png
Thanks for uploading Image:AnimatedEvolutionary.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 23:05, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Iron Man Image
ok we need to come to some middle ground or else we will just keep changing the picture over and over. So here is what I propose, we use this picture. <------ herePhoenix741 00:21, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Ironman
See here --Charlesknight 00:31, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Galactus
Not a very mature response. You also didn't even notice at how referencing and summarising information can improve an article. Wiki entries are NOT fan sites where posters can just keep adding irrelevant information to gratify themselves.
Asgardian 22:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
And again:
Eternity - you didn't even look at the valid point made on the Discussion page before reverting.
Celestials -
"Regardlessly. "
No such word.
"Nothing needs to be changed."
That's opinion.
"Now let's leave it as it is."
It's not just up to you. Misplaced Pages is a shared site.
Asgardian 04:32, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Galactus again?
Your most recent revert shows that you either don't understand the intricacies of editing (eg. present tense, links, brevity etc) or simply choose not to listen. I may have to get others involved.
Asgardian 04:36, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Eternity - you didn't even look at the valid point made on the Discussion page before reverting.
And how am I sepose to know that there is a "valid point" on the Discussion page?
- Try looking...
Asgardian 04:58, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
No such word.
- The correct pronounciation is "regardless" or "irrespective".
That's opinion.
It's not just up to you.
Jesus. Everyone here is reverting your edits. No one here agrees on your terms for them.
Well, that's opinion.
Didn't you get blocked from the Man-Beast article? DCincarnate
Yes. I misread the dates, and have learnt a few tricks since then. You would appear to also need some tuition given that some of your reverts are a step backward. Present tense, links and succinct sourced sentences can only help, yes?
Asgardian 04:58, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Eternity again. Been trumped by Thanos twice and unable to predict Adam Warlock's moves when he had the Infinity Gauntlet, although Warlock knew how Eternity would react. So, the qualities are NOT all-encompassing and yes, it is still confusing for a new reader. Far better to just say "near-omnipotent" as that is true.
Asgardian 09:23, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
You can't just that say that he doesn't have Omniscience from just two bad writings. And again, how is it confusing for a reader? Explain yourself better instead of judging everything from your own self-righteous point of view.
- That would appear to be you, as you do not seem to be able to accept stories that are regarded as CANON.
Asgardian 23:36, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
What stories.
- Oh, only the Infinity Gauntlet, Infinity War and Thanos: The End. Perhaps even a Defenders story or two featuring Eternity. Actually reading the comics does wonders.
Asgardian 23:47, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Batman managed to kick God's right hand Spectre in the face, and hurt him. Does that make Batman more powerful than the Spectre? No. It's called bad writing which occurs for any character, including Eternity.
1. We are talking about Eternity.
2. The same writer penned all these stories. They are canon, whether you agree or not.
Asgardian 00:04, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Umm, Infinity Gauntlet: master of mind, time, space. I see no reason as to why this would look bad against Eternity.
Thanos: The End + Heart Of The Universe: Thanos seen everything for what it was when he had it. He was above beings like LT even in the all knowing category.
And Omnipresence is not even an argue. He IS the universe, he has proven capabel of appearing wherever he wants, including without "physical" form.
Absorbing man
I just wanted to say good job on the image. Dont know where you found it but that might be a good place to stay. Lets see if Asgardian has a reason to get rid of it. Thefro552 13:27, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
What are you doing?
Why are you insisting that an image - which is great and better than the previous version - of Tiamut is placed somewhere that it will only disrupt text? The image can stay, but it needs to be off to the right. Why degrade the article?