Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 00:27, 15 January 2007

Archives

• RFA Thanks archive

1. 13 April – 9 August 2005
2. 14 August – 12 November 2005
3. 13 November – 3 December 2005
4. 4 December 2005 – 7 February 2006
5. 7 February – 30 March 2006
6. 31 March – July 19 2006
7. 20 July – 10 September 2006
8. 11 September 2006 – 11 October
9. 12 October 2006 – 11 November
10. 12 November 2006 – 11 December
11. 12 December 2006 – 12 January

Wikistress?

Hope the stress wasn't caused by looking at that long talk page! :-) Seriously, thanks for the offer, even if it was retracted quickly (better to retract now than later), and I hope your stress levels go down soon. Carcharoth 15:07, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

• It had something to do with it. It took me quite a while to archive it, to be honest, my system isn't the fastest, and it's been a rough few days where every little thing has been commented on and I figured I just can't do it again, especially not when I've asked that people stick to the main issue. Still, it's done with now. I think I finally worked out I'm a volunteer, and it means I can withdraw any time I like. I think my stress levels will probably go down if I stop trying to be reasonable. Take it easy yourself, and thanks for being so understanding. Steve block Talk 20:17, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Your subpage for discussing Esperanza

I don't think it is necessary, as there are discussion places on Misplaced Pages talk:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Esperanza and Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Wikipedia:Esperanza. Would you mind changing the template on WP:EA and redirect users to the 2 discussions? We wouldn't want a 3rd discussion area.--Ed Reviews? 22:15, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

• There is already a prominent link to the deletion review page in the deletion review section. To be honest the talk page makes it quite clear that any discussion of the essay and the talk page should occur at the village pump, I can't see where you raised your addition to the essay there as yet. If you want to engage in discussion over the text you wish to see added, then I'd rather you did that with the other participants in the edit war than engage with me over a suitable venue. If you can all agree a different venue I will be happy to update the link, but I'm not going to do so unilaterally. I hope that seems reasonable. Steve block Talk 22:23, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

3RR violations

Hi Steve. I reported both User:DCincarnate and User:Asgardian for 3RR violations during their edit war over Celestial (comics). Just thought you should know. --GentlemanGhost

• Okay, I've blocked them both. That edit war raged way longer than it needed to.

• And no one thought to look at the edit history and comments before acting. A compromise had just been reached and the article is now quite good. It took a little longer with DC as he didn't initially understand what playing with images does to the text.

(Asgardian)

Frank Miller

Hi Steve,

I was just wondering about your rating of Frank Miller (comics). Surely an article needs some references before it can be considered A class?

Iron Ghost 18:24, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

• Yeah, probably. I just jumped into the middle of another user knocking them down, and based the reinstatement on the bio rating. Feel free to take it down again. I don't know who set this comics article assessment up, but I'd like to shoot them. :) Steve block Talk 18:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

• • Ditto.

Iron Ghost 18:31, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

• • • Hey, I resemble that remark. It just needs practise is all. And good stewardship. And good faith and civility save me from saying more. Steve block Talk 18:39, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Keep an eye on Rex

Hi,

I noticed that Rex is not being polite, and with respect to the template he created, {{Construction}}, he deleted the recent comments - plus mine. I would advise you'll keep an eye on him. Who knows what he might do next shortly?

Thanks for your attention. - Qasamaan 19:30, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

• I don't think the deletion of the comics is too much to be worried about, I've seen him do it before. The previous time meant he was happy for the (it was an) image to be deleted, I think the same applies here based on the edit summary. Where is he not being polite? Steve block Talk 19:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

• Maybe you do have a point. Having deleted the feedbacks, and read a bit of his conversations at his talkpage (although I might have misjudged him a bit), I thought something funny was going on. - Qasamaan 19:42, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

GFDL

Steve, I hope there was no violation of GFDL on this edit due to a cut-&-paste from another page. Marijuana and comics don't really mix. ;) (All in good humour nothing more. Peace) Netkinetic | T / C / @ 00:13, 15 January 2007 (UTC)