| Revision as of 03:49, 15 January 2007 editDrboisclair (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,549 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:33, 15 January 2007 edit undoJustas Jonas (talk | contribs)203 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| ] 00:30, 14 January 2007 (UTC) | ] 00:30, 14 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :::Fair enough, some users do not like their user talk pages cluttered with messages. I wanted to discuss the ] article. Paring it down while keeping in information that characterizes it and fits it into Lutheran and Christian tradition in a way that gives more information than the usual encyclopedia entry.--] 03:49, 15 January 2007 (UTC) | :::Fair enough, some users do not like their user talk pages cluttered with messages. I wanted to discuss the ] article. Paring it down while keeping in information that characterizes it and fits it into Lutheran and Christian tradition in a way that gives more information than the usual encyclopedia entry.--] 03:49, 15 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :::Sounds like a good idea to me, Drboisclair. What do you have in mind? ] 13:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:33, 15 January 2007
Clutter, spam, and otherwise unnecessary material on this page will be deleted or archived. Thanks.
Please e-mail me via Wiki "E-mail this user".--Drboisclair 21:12, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hello, I choose not to have an e-mail on file with Wiki, so I can not e-mail you.
Justas Jonas 00:30, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Fair enough, some users do not like their user talk pages cluttered with messages. I wanted to discuss the Book of Concord article. Paring it down while keeping in information that characterizes it and fits it into Lutheran and Christian tradition in a way that gives more information than the usual encyclopedia entry.--Drboisclair 03:49, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Sounds like a good idea to me, Drboisclair. What do you have in mind? Justas Jonas 13:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC)