| Revision as of 11:59, 7 March 2021 editSlatersteven (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers73,211 edits →Alexei Eryomin← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:30, 10 March 2021 edit undoירמיהו - פרוגנוזה (talk | contribs)40 edits →Alexei EryominNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| *'''Delete''' as others have said. I don't see any real grounds for notability. -] (]) 09:11, 5 March 2021 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' as others have said. I don't see any real grounds for notability. -] (]) 09:11, 5 March 2021 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Very weak sourcing.] (]) 11:59, 7 March 2021 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Very weak sourcing.] (]) 11:59, 7 March 2021 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment''' "... work by fellow scientist Alexei Eryomin, noos-related concepts have grown in stature more than has been recognized..." ({{ISBN|978-1-9774-0530-2}}) ] (]) 12:30, 10 March 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:30, 10 March 2021
Alexei Eryomin
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Alexei Eryomin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:PROF. There is not a serious attempt by any of the sources to provide a biography of this rather obscure academic. Third-party citations, in particular, all seem to be either within a walled-garden of believers in noospheres or are one-off mentions. This looks like WP:SOAP as well. jps (talk) 23:38, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. jps (talk) 23:38, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. jps (talk) 23:38, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: See related Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Noogenesis as well as the previous AfD Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Noometry. jps (talk) 23:45, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. No pass of WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:47, 4 March 2021 (UTC).
- Delete per nom. The claim to notability is that he invented something non-notable. That's absolutely no good. So, in addition to the reasons already given, we should probably also delete it out of kindness as it just makes him look bad. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:51, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per all the above. XOR'easter (talk) 00:18, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 07:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 07:54, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Citation counts are too weak to support a pass of WP:PROF#C1, and we have no other case for notability. In addition, as his work seems to be at least somewhat fringe in nature, WP:NPOV and WP:FRINGE demand adequate mainstream coverage of it to provide a properly neutral description of his contributions, and we don't have those. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:13, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as others have said. I don't see any real grounds for notability. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:11, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Very weak sourcing.Slatersteven (talk) 11:59, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment "... work by fellow scientist Alexei Eryomin, noos-related concepts have grown in stature more than has been recognized..." Rondfeldt D., Arquilla J. (2020) Whose Story Wins: The Noösphere, Noöpolitik, and the Future of Statecraft. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. p.18, 99 pp.(ISBN 978-1-9774-0530-2) ירמיהו - פרוגנוזה (talk) 12:30, 10 March 2021 (UTC)