Revision as of 01:45, 15 March 2021 editShooler1 (talk | contribs)16 editsm →External links modifiedTag: Reverted← Previous edit |
Revision as of 01:45, 15 March 2021 edit undoShooler1 (talk | contribs)16 editsm →Arbitrary nature of articleTag: RevertedNext edit → |
Line 12: |
Line 12: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOAST |
|
== Arbitrary nature of article == |
|
|
|
|
|
Per the multiple issues tag I've added, this article (while it may be eligible for ] status) is extremely limited in its scope in discerning the broader aspects of the concept 'War Crime', the predominant interest being that of international law. |
|
|
|
|
|
It also focusses on a few specific examples, employing the use of ] such as 'murdered', 'massacre' and other descriptors which have not cited ] for the use of the terminology. |
|
|
|
|
|
Input by contributors has been sporadic and decidedly ] in selection of examples, a lack of transparency as to how certain examples have been selected above other pertinent examples, and there is no indication of the use of a tertiary source for the ] of "War crime". |
|
|
|
|
|
While I consider the subject to be a significant one, the article in itself smacks of ] ]. I will also reiterate previous concerns regarding its being used as a ]. --] (]) 04:57, 17 July 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
:Not sure what you mean ("limited in its scope in discerning the broader aspects of the concept 'War Crime', the predominant interest being that of international law"). I thought the "concept" as described in RS is pretty close to that in international law. In any event, you are welcome to contribute here. ] (]) 23:08, 3 April 2016 (UTC) |
|