Misplaced Pages

:Featured article candidates/U2/archive1: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates | U2 Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:50, 17 January 2007 editGimmeBot (talk | contribs)Bots75,273 editsm GimmeBot tagging closed FAC discussion← Previous edit Revision as of 06:59, 17 January 2007 edit undoGimmetrow (talk | contribs)Administrators45,380 edits Revert to the revision prior to revision 101279643 dated 2007-01-17 06:50:42 by GimmeBot using popupsNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--FAtop--><div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #E6F2FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following is an archived discussion of a ]. <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in ]. No further edits should be made to this page.''

The article was not promoted 20:17, 9 January 2007.
----

===]=== ===]===
A lot of work has been done on this one in the past weeks (references, pictures, cleanup). I think it is ready to be considered.] 18:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC) A lot of work has been done on this one in the past weeks (references, pictures, cleanup). I think it is ready to be considered.] 18:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Line 13: Line 7:
:Funny, the excerpts are gone. ] 09:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC) :Funny, the excerpts are gone. ] 09:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Weak oppose''' because the "Campaigning" section really needs to be a couple of paragraphs, and not so listy. If not for that, I'd probably support. ] 04:27, 2 January 2007 (UTC) *'''Weak oppose''' because the "Campaigning" section really needs to be a couple of paragraphs, and not so listy. If not for that, I'd probably support. ] 04:27, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive. <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in ]. No further edits should be made to this page.''</div><!--FAbottom--><!--Tagged by FA bot-->

Revision as of 06:59, 17 January 2007

U2

A lot of work has been done on this one in the past weeks (references, pictures, cleanup). I think it is ready to be considered.Buc 18:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Funny, the excerpts are gone. Wiki-newbie 09:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak oppose because the "Campaigning" section really needs to be a couple of paragraphs, and not so listy. If not for that, I'd probably support. Tuf-Kat 04:27, 2 January 2007 (UTC)