| Revision as of 06:59, 17 January 2007 editGimmetrow (talk | contribs)Administrators45,380 edits Revert to the revision prior to revision 101279643 dated 2007-01-17 06:50:42 by GimmeBot using popups← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:04, 17 January 2007 edit undoGimmeBot (talk | contribs)Bots75,273 editsm GimmeBot tagging closed FAC discussionNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <!--FAtop--><div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #E6F2FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following is an archived discussion of a ]. <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in ]. No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| The article was not promoted 20:17, 9 January 2007. | |||
| ---- | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| A lot of work has been done on this one in the past weeks (references, pictures, cleanup). I think it is ready to be considered.] 18:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC) | A lot of work has been done on this one in the past weeks (references, pictures, cleanup). I think it is ready to be considered.] 18:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Line 7: | Line 13: | ||
| :Funny, the excerpts are gone. ] 09:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | :Funny, the excerpts are gone. ] 09:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Weak oppose''' because the "Campaigning" section really needs to be a couple of paragraphs, and not so listy. If not for that, I'd probably support. ] 04:27, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | *'''Weak oppose''' because the "Campaigning" section really needs to be a couple of paragraphs, and not so listy. If not for that, I'd probably support. ] 04:27, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive. <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in ]. No further edits should be made to this page.''</div><!--FAbottom--><!--Tagged by FA bot--> | |||
Revision as of 07:04, 17 January 2007
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Misplaced Pages talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted 20:17, 9 January 2007.
U2
A lot of work has been done on this one in the past weeks (references, pictures, cleanup). I think it is ready to be considered.Buc 18:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Object, just after a quick look-lead is too short and doesn't summarize the article, citation needed tags need to have refs found and made.Sumoeagle179 18:28, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: would like to see the fair use media files placed in context at appropriate points within the article, rather than in its own section. The JPS 19:04, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Funny, the excerpts are gone. Wiki-newbie 09:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak oppose because the "Campaigning" section really needs to be a couple of paragraphs, and not so listy. If not for that, I'd probably support. Tuf-Kat 04:27, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Misplaced Pages talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.