Revision as of 16:50, 20 March 2021 editSMcCandlish (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors201,658 edits RfD notice← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:51, 20 March 2021 edit undoLibhye (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,375 edits →Help:IPA/Latin: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
] | ] | ||
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family:'Trebuchet MS'"> — ] ] ] 😼 </span> 16:49, 20 March 2021 (UTC) | A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family:'Trebuchet MS'"> — ] ] ] 😼 </span> 16:49, 20 March 2021 (UTC) | ||
== Help:IPA/Latin == | |||
There's a disagreement between me and another user about the use of the ] key on the articles ] and ]. Thought you might perhaps be interested since you've contributed to that key in the past. ] (]) 21:51, 20 March 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:51, 20 March 2021
SEMI-RETIRED This user is no longer very active on Misplaced Pages.
Your comments may be archived here after 48hrs |
Word/quotation of the moment:
(response to the scale-wandering rendition of the national anthem at CPAC 2021)
(Previous quotes) |
---|
|
Your GA nomination of Kaktovik numerals
The article Kaktovik numerals you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kaktovik numerals for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chipmunkdavis -- Chipmunkdavis (talk) 14:01, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Kaktovik numerals
The article Kaktovik numerals you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kaktovik numerals for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chipmunkdavis -- Chipmunkdavis (talk) 09:42, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Barnstar for you
The Mathematics Barnstar | ||
For getting Kaktovik numerals to good article status. Thank youAkrasia25 (talk) 18:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC) |
- Thanks! — kwami (talk) 21:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Consonant
You might want to refresh yourself on WP:BRD. That image has been in the article for 8 years. You removed it. I objected to your reason and restored it. Please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than continuing to remove it. Meters (talk) 04:12, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- It's stupid, added by someone who doesn't understand the difference between a symbol and the thing it represents. Or perhaps had dumbed down the article under the assumption that our readers were too stupid to know the difference. — kwami (talk) 04:14, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Again, take it to the article's talk page. It has been there for eight years so you'll need to make your case and get consensus for removing it. A personal attack against the person who added it is not going to help you case. And your summary did not specify the symbol, you simply said that
the letter t is not a consonant, it's a letter
. I disagreed. Meters (talk) 04:22, 14 March 2021 (UTC)- Then you don't know what a consonant is either, in the sense the word is being used in the article. And calling out someone for ignorance is not a personal attack. — kwami (talk) 04:26, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- I don't object your new image, but I find your comments insulting. I'm not interested in disusing this with you. Meters (talk) 04:56, 14 March 2021 (UTC).
- Then you don't know what a consonant is either, in the sense the word is being used in the article. And calling out someone for ignorance is not a personal attack. — kwami (talk) 04:26, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Again, take it to the article's talk page. It has been there for eight years so you'll need to make your case and get consensus for removing it. A personal attack against the person who added it is not going to help you case. And your summary did not specify the symbol, you simply said that
March 2021
Hello, I'm Hulmem. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, KBRW (AM), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. hulmem (talk) 22:58, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- The FCC has no authority over cities' names. That's up to the city. And it's officially the City of Utqiaġvik. — kwami (talk) 02:28, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
"South Scandinavian languages" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect South Scandinavian languages. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 20#South Scandinavian languages until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 16:49, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Help:IPA/Latin
There's a disagreement between me and another user about the use of the Help:IPA/Latin key on the articles Manlia gens and Romulus. Thought you might perhaps be interested since you've contributed to that key in the past. Libhye (talk) 21:51, 20 March 2021 (UTC)