| Revision as of 23:32, 16 January 2007 editAzer Red (talk | contribs)1,453 edits →To bureaucrat, or not to be← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:45, 17 January 2007 edit undoAzer Red (talk | contribs)1,453 edits archivingNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''Archives:''' ] | |||
| '''Welcome!''' | |||
| ---- | |||
| Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place <code><nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki></code> on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! | |||
| '''''] 02:57, 25 September 2006 (UTC)'''''' | |||
| PS: Also, your test worked, and your edits to ] were reverted. | |||
| :It wasn't a test. I thought that that statement had too much of a POV intent.--] ] 05:12, 1 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Alignment== | |||
| How about adjusting it and adding the cite template instead of removing the Criticism section? - ] 21:11, 5 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Maybe so.--] ] 23:56, 5 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Would you consider withdrawing your nomination for ]. If you have not yet read, please see a signifigant debate regarding this page at ], ], ], and ]. — ] <sup>]</sup> 01:01, 22 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Emergency revert == | |||
| What was that about?--] ] 22:34, 24 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm not sure if you're aware of the extreme vandalism that occurred around 15:30 (UTC), but it's discussed on ], ], and ]. The vandalism was especially hard to detect, so I looked through the history of the ] to see if there was a version that would not have the vandalized template. Reverting the ] to the previous version did not actually do anything, but it ''appeared'' to fix the issue because when I had checked the previous version, the image had been removed (unbeknownst to me) from the vandalized template. So, I reverted. However, by the time I went to check the Main Page again, the image was re-added to the previously vandalized template. Thus, it was back, leaving me confused as to how that happened. I checked ] and saw that someone had pointed out ] as the vandalized template. I protected the page and blocked the vandal. Someone got around to reverting my reversion on the ] before I could. I checked the history of ] and saw that the vandalism was being eliminated while I was performing my ] revert. -- ''']''' 22:43, 24 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yeah, I know what happened. I have the main page on my watchlist and I saw you make a revert to a version with a redlink to a deleted template, and I was just curious as to what was going on.--] ] 22:48, 24 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Your recent edits to ] and ] == | |||
| It has already been decided that just because a subject is not worthy of an article on wikipedia, does not mean it is not worthy of mention. Please, before making any major changes such as this again, discuss it on the relevant talk page. Thank you. -- ] 22:53, 25 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Your recent AfDs == | |||
| Hi there! Just a quick note about the two AfDs you recently submitted. It's always better to use the <nowiki>{{subst:afd2}}</nowiki> template, which can be copied from the AfD box in the article, when creating the debate - this ensures that the AfD is correctly formatted and appears in the appropriate category. Thanks. ] 23:40, 25 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for the info. I'll be sure to do so in the future.--] ] 23:43, 25 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I've delsited your speedy cat rename nomination for ], as the actor-->actress issue was raised during its ]. Feel free to start a new ] renaming discussion though. Thanks, — ] <sup>]</sup> 18:03, 26 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==SPA's on Afd discussions== | |||
| Hey. I noticed you have removed two ]' recommendations on ]. These should not be deleted, but instead be tagged with {{tl|spa}}, as in <nowiki>{{subst:spa|Username}}</nowiki>. This is more civil and reduces ]. As WP:BITE states, it's not nice to call newcomers "blatant socks". Also, the first SPA recommended deleting, not keeping. Thanks, ] 01:00, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Okay, I'll do that in the future. Thanks.--] ] 02:38, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == I always say == | |||
| That especially for bios of living persons, unsourced and questionable information should be removed promptly.--] 15:51, 1 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == American Nihilist Underground Society == | |||
| Have you heard the expression "stub-ifiy" used with regards to a wikipedia article? It consists of taking out '''everything''' that cannot be supported by a ] and placing the {{]}} tag at the bottom of the page. It's exactly what every article should look like anyway, but for those times when you're concerned about promotion/aggrandizement/succor-to-troll/whatever it is particulary useful. It's also almost bullet-proof: The removal of uncited material is chapter and verse for one of the ] of wikipedia. <br/><font color="black">]</font> 00:20, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == RE: Your nomination for adminship == | |||
| Azer that is truly a kind and generous nomination however others have approached me in the past. Administrator ] is interested in also nominating me by February and I believe that is more than an early enough date (considering I have started actively using this account since October of this year, even though it was registered in 2005). If you like you may submit a co-nom, I would be more than honored. Thank you for your generous support.] <font color="purple">]</font> 22:55, 5 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| ] | |||
| Didn't even notice until today. Nice to see people are actually looking at my userpage! <b>]</b> 06:50, 11 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :You're welcome.--] ] 22:14, 11 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==To bureaucrat, or not to be== | |||
| Hi Azer! First of all, I like your user page. It's a beautiful and individual statement. Lots of my favorite stuff there. :) Regarding the nomination, I'll decline for now; I don't watch RFA all that often (and probably wouldn't even pass, since I rarely take part in the policy discussions there). I appreciate your asking, though! Cheers, ] ] 23:27, 16 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Okay, thanks.--] ] 23:32, 16 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:45, 17 January 2007
Archives: 1