| Revision as of 15:55, 17 January 2007 editWerdnabot (talk | contribs)60,702 editsm Automated archival of 1 sections to User talk:Tawker/Jan07← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:36, 18 January 2007 edit undoWerdnabot (talk | contribs)60,702 editsm Automated archival of 1 sections to User talk:Tawker/Jan07Next edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| ==A request for assistance== | ==A request for assistance== | ||
| Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. ] 05:02 3 January 2007 (UTC). | Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. ] 05:02 3 January 2007 (UTC). | ||
| == A very Californian RfA thanks from ] == | |||
| {| width="90%" style="border:4px solid black; background:#f2f2ff; padding:3px; cellspacing:10px;" align=center | |||
| | <div style="border:1px solid black; background:white; padding:0px; width:150px;">]</div> | |||
| | valign="top" |Thanks for your support in my ''']''', which succeeded with a '''final tally''' of '''(97/4/4)'''! I've never been able to accept compliments gracefully, and the heavy support from this outstanding community left me at a complete loss for words -- so, a ''very belated'' ] for all of your kind words. | |||
| I have done and will continue to do the utmost to serve the community in this new capacity, wherever it may take me, and to set an example others might wish to follow in. With a little luck and a lot of ], this may be enough. Maybe someday the enwiki admins of the future will look back and say, "Yeah, ] was an admin." Hopefully then they don't start talking about the ''explosive'' ArbComm case I got tied into and ''oh what a drama that was'', but we'll see, won't we? | |||
| Surely some of you have seen me in action by now; with that in mind, I openly invite and welcome any feedback ] or ] -- help me become the best editor and sysop I can be. | |||
| :<big>'''''Again, thank you. –]'''''</big> | |||
| |} | |||
| :Ah, where would we be without Tawker? Count me in as a fan, both for AVB and WikipediaWeekly. Glad to have you around. Thanks for your trust. ] 13:06, 13 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | ==]== | ||
Revision as of 15:36, 18 January 2007
 | Tawker is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Misplaced Pages soon. |
Ok, the bot takes care of almost everything I do, I'm swamped with work right now. I'm outta here. If you need anything urgent, email me. -- Tawker 01:03, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
| This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 5 days are automatically archived to User talk:Tawker/Dec07. Sections without timestamps are not archived |
Archives (by month) @ User talk:Tawker/Archives
A request for assistance
Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. Bzuk 05:02 3 January 2007 (UTC).
Lee Nysted
Page is up on Google for months and someone is repeatedly changing same out of spite and sinister/vandalism mindset.
Chir_73 is the admin. that protected same.
My counsel is informed.
My publicist is informed.
Please ban users that violate the rules.
Re-instate the page.
Lee Nysted, Owner; Managing Partner NystedMusic, LLC.
www.NystedMusic.com
Lee@NystedMusic.com
www.MySpace.com/LeeNysted
www.isound.com/lee_nysted
Legal Counsel:
Frank W. Pirruccello, Esq. www.Musiclaw1.com (by User:Nyslee)
- Fixed the addition to your talk page. FYI, with Chir_73 the user meant me, and no, I did not protect the page, just deleted it. -- Chris 73 | Talk 18:19, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Lee Nysted again
Having deleted this yet again myself, and recieving threats of banning and legal action as a result, I restored it and sent it to AfD in the hope that the creator/subject would accept consensus rather than repeating his threats on the talk page of every administrator involved. If you're deleted and protecting it again, could you please explain this on the AfD? Thanks – Gurch 20:30, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Done, from what I've read the subject wanted the article deleted as vandals were posting false info, hence the delete and salt. -- Tawker 22:09, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
User:Kendrick7
Dear Tawker, I have unblocked this user per discussion on WP:AN3. Feel free to drop a hammer on my head if you disagree. Regards, — Nearly Headless Nick 13:56, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Bots
I was wondering why you deleted Misplaced Pages:Bots, since your summary was only (delete...). Shouldn't it be a redirect to Misplaced Pages:Bot policy instead, since a number of pages still link to it? Thanks. timrem 19:14, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, I'm trying to figure out an AVB login issue, I should set that redirect.... -- Tawker 20:40, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
WerdnaBot
I noticed that you commented on the Werdna Bot, and I assume you know how to use it, so I was wondering if you could really help me out and tell me if I have it set up right on my talk page, if you don't have the time though I completely understand. Thanks either way, --Daniel()Folsom |C| 06:10, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Just trying to understand
Hi Tawker, could you help me understand this case . Do you feel I erred in the block? The edit history of this account appears pretty problematic. I guess I just want to make sure I don't make the same mistake over again. Best, --Kukini 06:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)