Misplaced Pages

:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/William C. Rogers III: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Military history | Peer review Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:26, 19 January 2007 editDual Freq (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers37,108 edits request review  Revision as of 22:54, 19 January 2007 edit undoKirill Lokshin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users75,365 edits []: CommentsNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
=== ] === === ] ===
Improvements were made to the article in December 2006, I would like an article assessment and any notes to improve the article. Unfortunately I haven't found an image, but I think the basics of a biography are present. There is also a minor content issue involving the frequency of pipe bombings in San Diego in 1996, maybe someone could add their opinion on that issue as well. Thanks in advance for any comments. --] 21:26, 19 January 2007 (UTC) Improvements were made to the article in December 2006, I would like an article assessment and any notes to improve the article. Unfortunately I haven't found an image, but I think the basics of a biography are present. There is also a minor content issue involving the frequency of pipe bombings in San Diego in 1996, maybe someone could add their opinion on that issue as well. Thanks in advance for any comments. --] 21:26, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

==== ] ====

Let's see:
* The main issue with the article, at this point, is that it's unacceptably terse. The primary reason why Rogers is known is the IR655 incident; the article only devotes two sentences to it. The main ] article is meant to have more detail on the incident as a whole, of course; but it has, at the moment, more material on Rogers' role in it specifically, which isn't a good thing.
* The prose is quite choppy, with numerous one-sentence paragraphs. The text should really be coalesced into meatier blocks.
* The section headings should be in sentence case.
Other than that, this looks to have the basics down. As far as an image goes, is there an official one available from the Navy? ] 22:54, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:54, 19 January 2007

William C. Rogers III

Improvements were made to the article in December 2006, I would like an article assessment and any notes to improve the article. Unfortunately I haven't found an image, but I think the basics of a biography are present. There is also a minor content issue involving the frequency of pipe bombings in San Diego in 1996, maybe someone could add their opinion on that issue as well. Thanks in advance for any comments. --Dual Freq 21:26, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Kirill Lokshin

Let's see:

  • The main issue with the article, at this point, is that it's unacceptably terse. The primary reason why Rogers is known is the IR655 incident; the article only devotes two sentences to it. The main Iran Air Flight 655 article is meant to have more detail on the incident as a whole, of course; but it has, at the moment, more material on Rogers' role in it specifically, which isn't a good thing.
  • The prose is quite choppy, with numerous one-sentence paragraphs. The text should really be coalesced into meatier blocks.
  • The section headings should be in sentence case.

Other than that, this looks to have the basics down. As far as an image goes, is there an official one available from the Navy? Kirill Lokshin 22:54, 19 January 2007 (UTC)