| Revision as of 15:35, 20 January 2007 editWerdnabot (talk | contribs)60,702 editsm Automated archival of 1 sections to User talk:Tawker/Jan07← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:18, 21 January 2007 edit undoLRG5784 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,430 edits My botNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| Hi Tawker, could you help me understand this case . Do you feel I erred in the block? The edit history of this account appears pretty problematic. I guess I just want to make sure I don't make the same mistake over again. Best, --] 06:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC) | Hi Tawker, could you help me understand this case . Do you feel I erred in the block? The edit history of this account appears pretty problematic. I guess I just want to make sure I don't make the same mistake over again. Best, --] 06:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == My bot == | |||
| should probably have a flag so people's watchlists won't get saturated by bot edits. This was brought up by ]. Since my bot made about 600 edits this week, which I guess half the pages Larry is watching, it probably should be flagged so this can be prevented. Can you see what you can do? --] <small>(] | ])</small> 13:18, 21 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:18, 21 January 2007
 | Tawker is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Misplaced Pages soon. |
Ok, the bot takes care of almost everything I do, I'm swamped with work right now. I'm outta here. If you need anything urgent, email me. -- Tawker 01:03, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
| This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 5 days are automatically archived to User talk:Tawker/Dec07. Sections without timestamps are not archived |
Archives (by month) @ User talk:Tawker/Archives
A request for assistance
Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. Bzuk 05:02 3 January 2007 (UTC).
WerdnaBot
I noticed that you commented on the Werdna Bot, and I assume you know how to use it, so I was wondering if you could really help me out and tell me if I have it set up right on my talk page, if you don't have the time though I completely understand. Thanks either way, --Daniel()Folsom |C| 06:10, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Just trying to understand
Hi Tawker, could you help me understand this case . Do you feel I erred in the block? The edit history of this account appears pretty problematic. I guess I just want to make sure I don't make the same mistake over again. Best, --Kukini 06:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
My bot
should probably have a flag so people's watchlists won't get saturated by bot edits. This was brought up by Larry V. Since my bot made about 600 edits this week, which I guess half the pages Larry is watching, it probably should be flagged so this can be prevented. Can you see what you can do? --Imdanumber1 (talk | contribs) 13:18, 21 January 2007 (UTC)