| Revision as of 05:53, 4 May 2021 editDPL bot (talk | contribs)Bots668,524 edits dablink notification message (see the FAQ)← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:39, 9 May 2021 edit undoGreen light3 (talk | contribs)56 edits →Ikiga page: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile editNext edit → | ||
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
| (].) --] (]) 05:53, 4 May 2021 (UTC) | (].) --] (]) 05:53, 4 May 2021 (UTC) | ||
| == Ikiga page == | |||
| The citations speak for themselves on the criticism section that I have included. Your point that you cannot find it on another page substantiates my claim that the edit is original material for Wikimedia.. Thankyou ] (]) 11:39, 9 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:39, 9 May 2021
 Archives | ||
Index
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
Graham's latest editor
Think it's worth taking to here? Everything's really too stale, just general behavior and Graham's usual tendency is to stop editing for a while, return and repeat every 3-4 months. Not 100% sure it's worth the time. Ravensfire (talk) 00:47, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Honestly, there has to be some kind of further step we can take beyond a sockpuppet investigation. This has been going on for literally over a decade, and a sockpuppet investigation doesn't feel like enough, but I have absolutely no idea what kind of further steps we could take. Proper COI editing guidelines have been laid down, we've hashed over the same issues more than four times over 10 years, and if this is gonna be another rinse and repeat, something must be done to ensure this isn't going to be another decade of the same. Any thoughts? -- Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 00:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Ineffablebookkeeper, I don't have a good answer to that. I track a couple of highly active sockmasters in India film/TV related articles and they have zero concern about being blocked, create a new account and continue on. Since they're on a large IP, that's tough to block. Part of what makes Graham so difficult is she'll disappear for 6 months or more and then come back all innocent and no... I don't know this person. Nope!. I wouldn't mind ECP on the article, but she'll still fill up the article talk page, help desk and BLPN, just like she's done time and time before. And always, always, she's never ever the bad person. It's annoying. Ravensfire (talk) 23:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- ECP? What's that? Also, I seem to remember something a while back about Graham's MO partially presenting as "user whose first language isn't English, certainly not", when to be honest, mostly every time it's her. I suppose a checkuser against other previously-checkusered sockpuppets might be something, if it's possible? --Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 23:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tabi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chaya.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Recent edit reversion
In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.
I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.
I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Misplaced Pages article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 13:51, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- Ah, apologies! I aimed to give the article a good copyediting - I had no idea the material was a copyright vio to begin with, and if I had, I would've removed it. -- Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 14:50, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Kouta (music) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Kouta (music), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Misplaced Pages). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Misplaced Pages's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Inexpiable (talk) 15:43, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Words as words vs emphasis
Thank you for your comments on He (pronoun), Ineffablebookkeeper. My reading of the Manual of Style is that this should be italics, not emphasis.--Brett (talk) 18:19, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hi - I didn't realise the Manual of Style specifically covered words as words - you learn something new every day. Are you sure it would still read right for someone with a screenreader? As someone else pointed out to me regarding
{{transl}}and language tags, if the emphasis is there for the seeing reader, is it equally there for the screenreader? I'd appreciate the help. --Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 18:51, 28 March 2021 (UTC)- I'm afraid I don't know much about screen readers, so I'm just following the guidelines and doing the best I can. Given your lack of awareness of the MOS, your edit summary on He (pronoun) looks a bit uncharitable. Let's assume good faith and be kind to each other. --Brett (talk) 21:17, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- It does, and I'm sorry - I just put a lot of work into making articles more accessible, and sometimes it feels like no-one else thinks to include it when they think about improving an article. I'll try to keep spreading the word about accessibility more civil in the future. -- Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 21:20, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Senjafuda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chaya.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chinese.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Infoboxes
Please do not format placenames as a list in infoboxes. There is guidance on format at Template:Infobox person and Template:Infobox royalty. DrKay (talk) 16:51, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry - didn't know a guideline existed! -- Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 16:54, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Syrup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taint.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Ikiga page
The citations speak for themselves on the criticism section that I have included. Your point that you cannot find it on another page substantiates my claim that the edit is original material for Wikimedia.. Thankyou Green light3 (talk) 11:39, 9 May 2021 (UTC)