| Revision as of 05:02, 22 January 2007 editHipocrite (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,615 edits unverifiable← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:04, 22 January 2007 edit undoCindery (talk | contribs)3,807 edits JC=JDNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| *'''Merge''' Cindery is correct--] 04:37, 22 January 2007 (UTC) | *'''Merge''' Cindery is correct--] 04:37, 22 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| **So why merge? --] <small>]</small> 05:01, 22 January 2007 (UTC) | **So why merge? --] <small>]</small> 05:01, 22 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ***The citation in the Jane Dark article--the book ''Passing'' explains that Dark is Clover's pen name. At the JC article, under external links--the Academy of American Poets profile-- it states that Jane Dark's ''Sugarhigh!'' is Clover's blog.-] 05:04, 22 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:04, 22 January 2007
Jane Dark
Non notable journalist Hipocrite - «Talk» 04:34, 22 January 2007 (UTC) Should be merged to, you know, the person's real name, but this merge was undone by Badlydrawnjeff, who is clearly not stalking my contributions. Hipocrite - «Talk» 04:55, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Keep voters unable to verify existance of this non-existant person. Hipocrite - «Talk» 04:59, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- False. The external links clearly show existence of someone writing as "Jane Dark." --badlydrawnjeff talk 05:01, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- A pen name is not a person. Is the article about a person or a pen name. Unverifiable information is worse than irrelevant information. Hipocrite - «Talk» 05:02, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- False. The external links clearly show existence of someone writing as "Jane Dark." --badlydrawnjeff talk 05:01, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. I don't see how a journalist for the Village Voice can be non-"notable." Perfect example of why WP:BIO has/needs "just because someone doesn't fall into one of these categories doesn't mean an article on the person should automatically be deleted." --badlydrawnjeff talk 04:42, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- You withdraw an AfD as a merge and I'm stalking you? Please. Meanwhile, we have one person claiming Jane Dark is Joshua Clover without evidence or a reason as to why the two should be merged together, and two people thinking it should be kept. Sorry, not thinking a merge is the right move here. --badlydrawnjeff talk 04:57, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Journalist works for notable pub, is quoted and linked to. IronDuke 04:45, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- Merge--Jane Dark is a pen name of Joshua Clover.-Cindery
- Merge Cindery is correct--Dacium 04:37, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- So why merge? --badlydrawnjeff talk 05:01, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- The citation in the Jane Dark article--the book Passing explains that Dark is Clover's pen name. At the JC article, under external links--the Academy of American Poets profile-- it states that Jane Dark's Sugarhigh! is Clover's blog.-Cindery 05:04, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- So why merge? --badlydrawnjeff talk 05:01, 22 January 2007 (UTC)