Misplaced Pages

:Naming conventions (events): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:17, 22 January 2007 editFrancis Schonken (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users68,468 edits Undo revision 102485626 by Akradecki (talk) rv, there's no consensus about this. See also Misplaced Pages talk:Naming conventions← Previous edit Revision as of 21:51, 22 January 2007 edit undoCarcharoth (talk | contribs)Administrators73,550 edits rewrite to move towards covering more than just controversial events - a guideline titled Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions (events) should cover more than just controversial eventsNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:


==Conventions== ==Conventions==

===Controversial events===
Article names for current and historical events are often controversial. In particular, the use of strong words such as "massacre" can be a focus of heated debate. The use of particular strong words is neither universally encouraged nor discouraged. The spirit of these guidelines is to favour ''familiar'' terms used to identify the event. Rules to select a name should be applied in the following sequence: Article names for current and historical events are often controversial. In particular, the use of strong words such as "massacre" can be a focus of heated debate. The use of particular strong words is neither universally encouraged nor discouraged. The spirit of these guidelines is to favour ''familiar'' terms used to identify the event. Rules to select a name should be applied in the following sequence:


Line 11: Line 13:
#If there is no common name for the event and no generally accepted descriptive word, use a descriptive name that does not carry ] implications. #If there is no common name for the event and no generally accepted descriptive word, use a descriptive name that does not carry ] implications.


===Definitions=== ===Other events===
For examples of naming conventions for non-controversial events, see ] for military history naming conventions, and ] for guidance on dates in the titles of articles about events. For other types of events, there is not yet any established guideline to follow, other than the general guidance at ].

==Definitions==
A '''common name''' or '''standing expression''' exists if most English speakers who are aware of the topic call it the same thing. Slight variations on the name, such as changes in word order, count as the same common name. For example, World War II is often called the Second World War; they are close enough to be considered variations of the same common name. A '''common name''' or '''standing expression''' exists if most English speakers who are aware of the topic call it the same thing. Slight variations on the name, such as changes in word order, count as the same common name. For example, World War II is often called the Second World War; they are close enough to be considered variations of the same common name.


A '''generally accepted word''' is a word for which there is consensus, among scholars in the real world, on its applicability to the event. The use of a strong word may still be controversial among politicians, Misplaced Pages editors, or the general public. A '''generally accepted word''' is a word for which there is consensus, among scholars in the real world, on its applicability to the event. The use of a strong word may still be controversial among politicians, Misplaced Pages editors, or the general public.


===Neutral Point of View=== ==Neutral Point of View==

Regardless of which rule applies, there may still be different ] on how to characterize the event, and some of these points of view may be contrary to the title. These points of view should be discussed in the article. By longstanding tradition, Misplaced Pages article names are not expected to fairly represent all points of view. Regardless of which rule applies, there may still be different ] on how to characterize the event, and some of these points of view may be contrary to the title. These points of view should be discussed in the article. By longstanding tradition, Misplaced Pages article names are not expected to fairly represent all points of view.


==Examples== ==Examples==
The following are examples of titles used in Misplaced Pages articles, with explanations as to the reasoning behind the choice of title.

===Controversial events===
*]: This is a common name, and scholars generally agree that a massacre took place. Rule #1 applies, and rule #2 would give the same result. *]: This is a common name, and scholars generally agree that a massacre took place. Rule #1 applies, and rule #2 would give the same result.
*]: This is a common name, so it should be used even though many people consider it to be propagandistic. Rule #1 applies. *]: This is a common name, so it should be used even though many people consider it to be propagandistic. Rule #1 applies.
Line 26: Line 33:
*]: The term "Darfur genocide" is used, but is not common enough to constitute a common name, so rule #1 does not apply. Many people consider the conflict to be a genocide, however there is no general scholarly agreement on this yet, so rule #2 does not apply. Hence rule #3 applies, and "conflict" is used instead of "genocide." *]: The term "Darfur genocide" is used, but is not common enough to constitute a common name, so rule #1 does not apply. Many people consider the conflict to be a genocide, however there is no general scholarly agreement on this yet, so rule #2 does not apply. Hence rule #3 applies, and "conflict" is used instead of "genocide."
*]: A debate ] concluded that there was no common name for the event. Scholars agree that the events were acts of terrorism, however adding the word "terrorist" to the title would have given it more words than necessary to identify the event. *]: A debate ] concluded that there was no common name for the event. Scholars agree that the events were acts of terrorism, however adding the word "terrorist" to the title would have given it more words than necessary to identify the event.

===Other events===
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]


==See also== ==See also==
* ] *]
* ] *]

Revision as of 21:51, 22 January 2007

Blue tickThis page documents an English Misplaced Pages naming conventions.
Editors should generally follow it, though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on this guideline's talk page.
Main page: Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions

The following guidelines apply to events and activities such as military conflicts and terrorist incidents.

Conventions

Controversial events

Article names for current and historical events are often controversial. In particular, the use of strong words such as "massacre" can be a focus of heated debate. The use of particular strong words is neither universally encouraged nor discouraged. The spirit of these guidelines is to favour familiar terms used to identify the event. Rules to select a name should be applied in the following sequence:

  1. If there is a particular common name for the event, it should be used even if it implies a controversial point of view.
  2. If there is no common name for the event, and there is a generally accepted word used when identifying the event, the title should include the word even if it is a strong one such as "massacre" or "genocide" or "war crime". However, to keep article names short, avoid including more words than are necessary to identify the event. For example, the adjective "terrorist" is usually not needed.
  3. If there is no common name for the event and no generally accepted descriptive word, use a descriptive name that does not carry POV implications.

Other events

For examples of naming conventions for non-controversial events, see here for military history naming conventions, and here for guidance on dates in the titles of articles about events. For other types of events, there is not yet any established guideline to follow, other than the general guidance at Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions.

Definitions

A common name or standing expression exists if most English speakers who are aware of the topic call it the same thing. Slight variations on the name, such as changes in word order, count as the same common name. For example, World War II is often called the Second World War; they are close enough to be considered variations of the same common name.

A generally accepted word is a word for which there is consensus, among scholars in the real world, on its applicability to the event. The use of a strong word may still be controversial among politicians, Misplaced Pages editors, or the general public.

Neutral Point of View

Regardless of which rule applies, there may still be different points of view on how to characterize the event, and some of these points of view may be contrary to the title. These points of view should be discussed in the article. By longstanding tradition, Misplaced Pages article names are not expected to fairly represent all points of view.

Examples

The following are examples of titles used in Misplaced Pages articles, with explanations as to the reasoning behind the choice of title.

Controversial events

  • My Lai massacre: This is a common name, and scholars generally agree that a massacre took place. Rule #1 applies, and rule #2 would give the same result.
  • War on Terrorism: This is a common name, so it should be used even though many people consider it to be propagandistic. Rule #1 applies.
  • Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse: "Torture" was a controversial word here. There is no common name, so rule #1 does not apply. There is general scholarly agreement that torture has taken place, so rule #2 kicks in.
  • Darfur conflict: The term "Darfur genocide" is used, but is not common enough to constitute a common name, so rule #1 does not apply. Many people consider the conflict to be a genocide, however there is no general scholarly agreement on this yet, so rule #2 does not apply. Hence rule #3 applies, and "conflict" is used instead of "genocide."
  • September 11, 2001 attacks: A debate here concluded that there was no common name for the event. Scholars agree that the events were acts of terrorism, however adding the word "terrorist" to the title would have given it more words than necessary to identify the event.

Other events

See also

Category: