| Revision as of 13:25, 9 June 2021 editDrmies (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators406,797 edits →Edit warring on Elazar ShachTag: Reverted← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:35, 9 June 2021 edit undoWinchester2313 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,763 edits →Edit warring on Elazar ShachTag: RevertedNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| I noticed you are edit warring on ]. Please stop this now, and use the talk page to reach consensus, especially when arbitrarily removing longstanding and properly sourced content. Remember that this page was protected previously, and nobody wants that to happen again. Failure to resolve your issues on the talk page and continued edit warring will likely result in a personal block against you. ] (]) 13:20, 9 June 2021 (UTC) | I noticed you are edit warring on ]. Please stop this now, and use the talk page to reach consensus, especially when arbitrarily removing longstanding and properly sourced content. Remember that this page was protected previously, and nobody wants that to happen again. Failure to resolve your issues on the talk page and continued edit warring will likely result in a personal block against you. ] (]) 13:20, 9 June 2021 (UTC) | ||
| *], if you continue edit warring I will be happy to block ''you'', since it's obvious that you are restoring duplicate content--and that's disruptive. ] (]) 13:25, 9 June 2021 (UTC) | *], if you continue edit warring I will be happy to block ''you'', since it's obvious that you are restoring duplicate content--and that's disruptive. ] (]) 13:25, 9 June 2021 (UTC) | ||
| *I simply restored a blanked section that I did not see duplicated on the page. An actual explanation of where the information is duplicated would be more beneficial, don't you think? ] (]) 13:35, 9 June 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:35, 9 June 2021
meta:User talk:Pare Mo
This page is a soft redirect.
Edit warring on Elazar Shach
I noticed you are edit warring on Elazar Shach. Please stop this now, and use the talk page to reach consensus, especially when arbitrarily removing longstanding and properly sourced content. Remember that this page was protected previously, and nobody wants that to happen again. Failure to resolve your issues on the talk page and continued edit warring will likely result in a personal block against you. Winchester2313 (talk) 13:20, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Winchester2313, if you continue edit warring I will be happy to block you, since it's obvious that you are restoring duplicate content--and that's disruptive. Drmies (talk) 13:25, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- I simply restored a blanked section that I did not see duplicated on the page. An actual explanation of where the information is duplicated would be more beneficial, don't you think? Winchester2313 (talk) 13:35, 9 June 2021 (UTC)