Misplaced Pages

Behringer: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:52, 11 June 2021 editToeSchmoker (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,390 editsm →Instruments: removed "analog", wasp has digital oscillators but analogue filters ... perhaps a matter of contention← Previous edit Revision as of 08:32, 8 July 2021 edit undo182.255.62.155 (talk) →Legal casesTags: Reverted references removedNext edit →
Line 75: Line 75:


=== Legal cases === === Legal cases ===
In June 1997, the ] company (now LOUD Technologies) accused Behringer of trademark and ] infringement, and brought suit seeking $327M in damages.<ref name=":0"> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080125141419/http://sec.edgar-online.com/1998/05/14/17/0001047469-98-020293/Section8.asp |date=25 January 2008 }}</ref><ref></ref> The claims were later rejected by the court. In their suit, Mackie said that Behringer had had a history of copying products by other manufacturers and selling them as their own.<ref name=Billboard1997>Verna, Paul. ''Billboard'', 5 July 1997. Retrieved 27 October 2009.</ref> The Mackie suit detailed an instance, in which Behringer was sued by ] for copying the Aural Exciter Type F. In that case Aphex Systems won ]690,000.<ref name=Billboard1997/> The Mackie suit also mentioned similar cases filed by BBE, ] and Drawmer.<ref name=Billboard1997/> On 30 November 1999, the U.S. District Court in Seattle, Washington, dismissed Mackie claims that Behringer had infringed on Mackie copyrights with its MX 8000 mixer, noting that circuit ] are not covered by copyright laws.<ref>{{Cite web | url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5264/is_199902/ai_n20420920 |title=Mackie/Behringer lawsuit. {{!}} ''&#91;&#91;The Music Trades&#93;&#93;'' {{!}} Find Articles at Bnet.com |access-date=25 October 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071216010944/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5264/is_199902/ai_n20420920 |archive-date=16 December 2007 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>'']'', February 1999. {{dead link|date=December 2011}} Retrieved on 8 September 2009.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/1999/252.html |title=Mackie Designs Inc v. Behringer Specialised studio equipment (UK) Ltd, Ulrich Bernhard Behringer & Behringer Spezielle Studiotechnik GmbH EWHC Ch 252 (22nd February, 1999) |publisher=Bailii.org |date=23 April 1999 |access-date=2011-12-30}}</ref> In June 1997, the ] company (now LOUD Technologies) accused Behringer of trademark and ] infringement, and brought suit seeking $327M in damages.<ref name="%253A0"> {{webarchive|url=/web/20080125141419/http://sec.edgar-online.com/1998/05/14/17/0001047469-98-020293/Section8.asp |date=25 January 2008 }}</ref><ref></ref> The claims were later rejected by the court. In their suit, Mackie said that Behringer had had a history of copying products by other manufacturers and selling them as their own.<ref name=Billboard1997>Verna, Paul. ''Billboard'', 5 July 1997. Retrieved 27 October 2009.</ref> The Mackie suit detailed an instance, in which Behringer was sued by ] for copying the Aural Exciter Type F. In that case Aphex Systems won ]690,000.<ref name=Billboard1997%252F> The Mackie suit also mentioned similar cases filed by BBE, ] and Drawmer.<ref name=Billboard1997%252F> On 30 November 1999, the U.S. District Court in Seattle, Washington, dismissed Mackie claims that Behringer had infringed on Mackie copyrights with its MX 8000 mixer, noting that circuit ] are not covered by copyright laws.<ref>{{Cite web | url=/p/articles/mi_hb5264/is_199902/ai_n20420920 |title=Mackie/Behringer lawsuit. {{!}} ''&#91;&#91;The Music Trades&#93;&#93;'' {{!}} Find Articles at Bnet.com |access-date=25 October 2007 |archive-url=/web/20071216010944/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5264/is_199902/ai_n20420920 |archive-date=16 December 2007 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>'']'', February 1999. {{dead link|date=December 2011}} Retrieved on 8 September 2009.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/1999/252.html |title=Mackie Designs Inc v. Behringer Specialised studio equipment (UK) Ltd, Ulrich Bernhard Behringer & Behringer Spezielle Studiotechnik GmbH EWHC Ch 252 (22nd February, 1999) |publisher=Bailii.org |date=23 April 1999 |access-date=2011-12-30}}</ref>


In 2005, ] sued to enforce Roland's trade dress, trademark, and other intellectual property rights with regard to Behringer's recently released guitar pedals. The companies came to a confidential settlement in 2006 after Behringer changed their designs.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://mixonline.com/news/headline/behringer-roland-lawsuit-041006/ | title = Behringer and Roland Settle Lawsuit | date = 10 April 2006 | access-date = 29 December 2009 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20090719100435/http://mixonline.com/news/headline/behringer-roland-lawsuit-041006/ | archive-date = 19 July 2009 | url-status = dead}}</ref> In 2005, ] sued to enforce Roland's trade dress, trademark, and other intellectual property rights with regard to Behringer's recently released guitar pedals. The companies came to a confidential settlement in 2006 after Behringer changed their designs.<ref>{{cite web | url =/news/headline/behringer-roland-lawsuit-041006/ | title = Behringer and Roland Settle Lawsuit | date = 10 April 2006 | access-date = 29 December 2009 | archive-url =/web/20090719100435/http://mixonline.com/news/headline/behringer-roland-lawsuit-041006/ | archive-date = 19 July 2009 | url-status = dead}}</ref>


In 2009, ] filed two lawsuits against various companies under the Behringer/Music Group umbrella for patent infringement, federal and common law trademark infringement, false designation of origin, trademark dilution and unfair competition.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sonicstate.com/news/2011/05/02/peavey-files-lawsuits-against-behringer/ |title=Peavey Files Lawsuits Against Behringer, Intellectual property issues cited |publisher=Sonicstate.com |access-date=2011-12-30}}</ref> In 2011 The Music Group filed a countersuit against Peavey for "false advertising, false patent marking and unfair competition."<ref>{{cite web |last=Cooper |first=Gary |url=http://www.mi-pro.co.uk/news/32272/Behringers-MUSIC-group-files-US-suit-against-Peavey |title=Behringer's MUSIC group files US suit against Peavey |work=Musical instrument industry news |publisher=MI Pro |access-date=2011-12-30 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110502165553/http://www.mi-pro.co.uk/news/32272/Behringers-MUSIC-group-files-US-suit-against-Peavey |archive-date=2 May 2011 |url-status=dead}}</ref> In 2009, ] filed two lawsuits against various companies under the Behringer/Music Group umbrella for patent infringement, federal and common law trademark infringement, false designation of origin, trademark dilution and unfair competition.<ref>{{cite web|url=/news/2011/05/02/peavey-files-lawsuits-against-behringer/ |title=Peavey Files Lawsuits Against Behringer, Intellectual property issues cited |publisher=Sonicstate.com |access-date=2011-12-30}}</ref> In 2011 The Music Group filed a countersuit against Peavey for "false advertising, false patent marking and unfair competition."<ref>{{cite web |last=Cooper |first=Gary |url=/news/32272/Behringers-MUSIC-group-files-US-suit-against-Peavey |title=Behringer's MUSIC group files US suit against Peavey |work=Musical instrument industry news |publisher=MI Pro |access-date=2011-12-30 |archive-url=/web/20110502165553/http://www.mi-pro.co.uk/news/32272/Behringers-MUSIC-group-files-US-suit-against-Peavey |archive-date=2 May 2011 |url-status=dead}}</ref>


Court battle
In 2017, Music Group filed a defamation lawsuit against ], a Dave Smith Instruments engineer, and 20 ] forum users. The case was dismissed as a ] lawsuit.<ref>https://cdm.link/2018/06/behringer-have-sued-dave-smith-instruments-forum-posters-for-defamation/</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Wilson |first1=Scott |title=Behringer tried to sue Dave Smith Instruments and 20 forum users for libel |url=https://www.factmag.com/2018/06/20/behringer-dave-smith-libel-case/ |website=Fact Magazine |access-date=11 June 2021}}</ref>
In 2002 she built, developed and co-created Gearslutz. Gearslutz is the largest pro-audio producer and sound engineer's forum on the web. On the 18th June 2010 in the High Court of Justice#Chancery Division in London, England, Margaret O'Leary aka Meg Lee Chin won a claim against her former business partner Julian Standen. After 3 years where she battled for her right to co-ownership of the Gearslutz business, Judge Master Justice Briggs ruled in Chin's favor for claim #HC07C03181. The settlement amount was agreed out of court.

In 2021, Meg responded to a petition where a group of women made a request for a name change to the site due to accusations of sexism. Chin surprised the audio community by revealing that she actually built the site. The name has since been changed to Gearspace

In response to interest stemming from the name change controversy and in order to provide insight into the injustices of the legal system, Chin Lee Chin created the Gearwarz website.


== Controversies == == Controversies ==

Revision as of 08:32, 8 July 2021

Audio equipment manufacturer Not to be confused with Beringer.

This article may require cleanup to meet Misplaced Pages's quality standards. The specific problem is: Advertisement; Promotional; biased press releases as sources. Please help improve this article if you can. (February 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Behringer
File:Behringer logo 2010.png
A Behringer audio mixer
Company typeprivate
Genreaudio equipment
Founded25 January 1989; 35 years ago (1989-01-25) in Germany
Key peopleUli Behringer (Founder and CEO)
ProductsAudio and lighting equipment, musical instruments
Number of employees3,500
ParentMusic Tribe
Websitewww.behringer.com

Behringer is an audio equipment company founded by the Swiss engineer Uli Behringer on 25 January 1989, in Willich, Germany. Behringer was the 14th largest manufacturer of music products in 2007. Behringer is a worldwide, multinational group of companies, with direct marketing presence in ten countries or territories and a sales network in over 130 countries around the world.

Though originally a German manufacturer, it now manufactures its products in China. Behringer is owned by Music Tribe, a holding company founded and chaired by Uli Behringer.

History

Foundation and early development

Company founder, Uli Behringer, was born 1961 in Baden, Switzerland. Behringer's father was a church organist and nuclear physicist; his mother a pianist and interpreter; his uncle a professor of composition at the Richard Strauss Conservatory in Munich; and his aunt a classical singer and pianist. At the age of four, Uli Behringer started to learn piano. When he was five years old, his father built his own church organ with over 1000 pipes and integrated them into the family home. Behringer helped his father build the organ. At the age of 16, he built his first synthesizer, the UB1.

Marketing, manufacturing, and acquisitions

While Behringer products were manufactured in Willich, Germany, many of the individual components were imported from mainland China. In 1990, to lower production costs, Behringer shifted production from West Germany to mainland China. Initially, subcontractors were engaged to produce the equipment. By 1997 Uli Behringer had relocated to Hong Kong to better supervise manufacturing quality.

CoolAudio acquisition

The certified EMC testing facility in Behringer City

In May 2000, Behringer acquired the rights to the entire CoolAudio technology from Intersil Corporation, a US-based semi-conductor manufacturer specializing in integrated circuits for audio applications. The acquisition included an extensive intellectual property portfolio and licensees such as Alpine and Rowe, among others.

Behringer City

In 2002, Behringer completed its own factory, named "Behringer City," in Zhongshan, Guangdong province, China after it consolidated more than ten separate production locations into one vertically integrated plant, comprising eight buildings where electronics, speakers, guitars, and digital pianos are produced. This strategy was different than that taken by other musical instrument companies at the time who relied on third party manufacturers. Choosing to run a self-contained plant allowed Behringer a greater level of quality control. The 1,200,000-square-foot (110,000 m) manufacturing complex in Zhongshan ships more than 2.5 million Behringer products per year to markets around the globe. The plant turns out over 50,000 mixers per month.

Instruments

The Behringer RD-8 drum machine (top) is based on the Roland TR-808 drum machine (bottom).

Since 2016, Behringer has become a manufacturer of synthesizers and drum machines, which includes original synths, but also many recreations of old classic synthesizers, chips and hardware. Although some manufacturers such as Curtis are not happy about their products being cloned, Behringer has claimed that creating clones of older hardware is legal where the patents have expired.

In 2016, they released their first commercial synths the Deepmind 12 and Deepmind 6. Shortly after they followed by the Deepmind 12D which was a desktop alternative to the Deepmind synths. The design of the Deepmind was inspired by the Roland Juno-106. Their second original synth was the Neutron and their third was Behringer Crave, released in 2019. The Crave is an original semi-modular synthesizer based on the Roland TB-303. Since 2018, Behringer has produced clones of synthesizers and drum machines including the Roland TB-303, Korg Monopoly, Arp 2600, Arp Odyssey, Roland TR-808, TR-909, Roland SH-101, Minimoog, Sequential Circuits Prophet-600 and EDP Wasp.

Behringer is known for releasing their synthesizers at budget prices. They have built a "synth on a chip" technology based on the Curtis CEM3396 chips, which means they can produce low cost synthesizers.

Legal developments

FCC dispute

In February 2006, the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) fined Behringer $1M, issuing a Notice of Apparent Liability against Behringer, claiming that 50 of the company's products had not been tested for conducted and radiated emissions limits as required by US law, and noting that Behringer continued to sell the products for a year after being notified. Behringer's position was that they believed that since the units had passed stringent European CE standards, they would also comply with FCC verification requirements. According to Behringer, it had overlooked the differences in testing standards and procedures under FCC and European requirements. The company has since implemented a complete UL certified safety and EMC testing laboratory under the UL Certified Witness Program, including in-house audits and global regulatory review systems.

Legal cases

In June 1997, the Mackie company (now LOUD Technologies) accused Behringer of trademark and trade dress infringement, and brought suit seeking $327M in damages. The claims were later rejected by the court. In their suit, Mackie said that Behringer had had a history of copying products by other manufacturers and selling them as their own. The Mackie suit detailed an instance, in which Behringer was sued by Aphex Systems for copying the Aural Exciter Type F. In that case Aphex Systems won DM690,000.Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page).

In 2005, Roland Corporation sued to enforce Roland's trade dress, trademark, and other intellectual property rights with regard to Behringer's recently released guitar pedals. The companies came to a confidential settlement in 2006 after Behringer changed their designs.

In 2009, Peavey Electronics Corporation filed two lawsuits against various companies under the Behringer/Music Group umbrella for patent infringement, federal and common law trademark infringement, false designation of origin, trademark dilution and unfair competition. In 2011 The Music Group filed a countersuit against Peavey for "false advertising, false patent marking and unfair competition."

Court battle In 2002 she built, developed and co-created Gearslutz. Gearslutz is the largest pro-audio producer and sound engineer's forum on the web. On the 18th June 2010 in the High Court of Justice#Chancery Division in London, England, Margaret O'Leary aka Meg Lee Chin won a claim against her former business partner Julian Standen. After 3 years where she battled for her right to co-ownership of the Gearslutz business, Judge Master Justice Briggs ruled in Chin's favor for claim #HC07C03181. The settlement amount was agreed out of court.

In 2021, Meg responded to a petition where a group of women made a request for a name change to the site due to accusations of sexism. Chin surprised the audio community by revealing that she actually built the site. The name has since been changed to Gearspace

In response to interest stemming from the name change controversy and in order to provide insight into the injustices of the legal system, Chin Lee Chin created the Gearwarz website.

Controversies

In March 2020, Behringer published a mock video for a synthesizer, the "KIRN CorkSniffer", which appeared to mock music technology journalist and synthesiser developer Peter Kirn. The video received criticism and accusations of using antisemitic imagery. Company founder Uli Behringer issued a response on Facebook, saying the video had been intended as "pure satire by our marketing department". The apology was deleted the following day.

See also

References

  1. "Behringer: Movers and Shakers". behringer.com. Archived from the original on 20 July 2011. Retrieved 3 October 2010.
  2. "Interview: Uli Behringer, seine Erfolgsgeschichte". AMAZONA.de (in German). 15 November 2009. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
  3. Note: Behringer's father had bought the organ from a church demolition in 1965.
  4. "Interview & Reisereport: Uli Behringer 2019 in China". AMAZONA.de (in German). 8 May 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
  5. "The Behringer Story". Behringer. Archived from the original on 25 September 2009. Retrieved 29 December 2009.
  6. Holder, Christopher. "NAME BEHIND THE NAME: Uli Behringer, Behringer Inc". AudioTechnology. Retrieved 13 May 2021.
  7. Holst, Cindy. "Behringer Acquires Rights to CoolAudio". Sound & Video Contractor. Future plc. Retrieved 15 April 2021.
  8. Sherbourne, Simon (January 2020). "Behringer RD-8 Rhythm Designer". Sound on Sound. SOS Publications Group. Retrieved 27 November 2020.
  9. "5 Popular Synths That Keep Going Down in Price". reverb.com. Retrieved 9 February 2021.
  10. ^ Warwick, Oli (8 April 2017). "Attack of the clones: Is Behringer's Minimoog a synth replica too far?". Fact. Retrieved 30 November 2018.
  11. "Curtis chip company speaks out against vintage synth cloning". Fact Magazine. 22 March 2017. Retrieved 9 February 2021.
  12. April 2017, Bruce Aisher 16. "Behringer DeepMind 12 review". MusicRadar. Retrieved 9 February 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  13. "Sonic LAB: Behringer DeepMind 12 Review". Sonicstate. Retrieved 9 February 2021.
  14. "Behringer details wireless-enabled DeepMind 12 polyphonic synth". Fact Magazine. 1 August 2016. Retrieved 9 February 2021.
  15. ^ Deahl, Dani (1 February 2019). "5 of our favorite synths from NAMM 2019". The Verge. Retrieved 9 February 2021.
  16. "Behringer Readies TD-3 – Roland TB-303 Clone | FutureMusic the latest news on future music technology DJ gear producing dance music edm and everything electronic". futuremusic.com. Retrieved 7 December 2020.
  17. "Behringer MonoPoly ready for production". gearnews.com. 16 October 2020. Retrieved 7 December 2020.
  18. "Korg's ARP 2600 FS Should Not Be Overlooked | FutureMusic the latest news on future music technology DJ gear producing dance music edm and everything electronic". futuremusic.com. Retrieved 7 December 2020.
  19. "Behringer 2600 rolls off the production line, to cost $599!". gearnews.com. 19 October 2020. Retrieved 7 December 2020.
  20. "Behringer Odyssey Review". MusicTech. 9 September 2019. Retrieved 9 February 2021.
  21. "Behringer gives us an update on the RD-9 drum machine". gearnews.com. 13 September 2020. Retrieved 7 December 2020.
  22. "Behringer Readies RD-8 Drum Machine For Holiday Delivery | FutureMusic the latest news on future music technology DJ gear producing dance music edm and everything electronic". futuremusic.com. Retrieved 7 December 2020.
  23. "Behringer MS-101 Review". MusicTech. 17 October 2019. Retrieved 9 February 2021.
  24. "Behringer reveals the PRO-800: clone of Sequential Prophet-600 with no keys and extra voices". gearnews.com. 17 September 2020. Retrieved 7 December 2020.
  25. "Behringer Announces Poly D | FutureMusic the latest news on future music technology DJ gear producing dance music edm and everything electronic". futuremusic.com. Retrieved 7 December 2020.
  26. Wilson, Scott. "Behringer launches $299 clone of classic Wasp synthesizer". Fact Magazine. Retrieved 11 June 2021.
  27. "Is Behringer's Cheap Analog Synthesizer Worth It?". Telekom Electronic Beats. 12 August 2016. Retrieved 9 February 2021.
  28. "Best synths to buy in 2021: 17 of the best synthesizers under $600". MusicTech. 2 February 2021. Retrieved 9 February 2021.
  29. July 2020, Ben Rogerson07. "Behringer now has access to a 'synth on a chip', which could mean many more compact and affordable analogue polys". MusicRadar. Retrieved 9 February 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  30. Jacca-RouteNote (7 July 2020). "Behringer can now create controllable analogue synth in a single tiny chip". RouteNote Blog. Retrieved 9 February 2021.
  31. ^ Gearwire.com. 14 June 2007. "Behringer Fined One Million Dollars By FCC." Archived 17 October 2007 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 4 October 2009.
  32. Radio Currents Online, 20–26 February 2006 Archived 16 February 2009 at the Wayback Machine
  33. "Behringer Resolved FCC Compliance Issues Before Recent Ruling". Musiciansnews.com. Archived from the original on 29 January 2013. Retrieved 29 December 2009.
  34. Loud Technologies Inc. LTec Quarterly Report (10-Q) Item 1. Legal Proceedings Error in Webarchive template: Invalid URL.
  35. Mackie Designs Inc. Files Lawsuit to Stop "Knockoff" Products... | Business Wire | Find Articles at Bnet.com
  36. Verna, Paul. Billboard, 5 July 1997. "Mackie Sues Over Knockoffs: Behringer, Sam Ash Are Defendants." Retrieved 27 October 2009.
  37. The Music Trades, February 1999. Archived at Entrepreneur.com as "Mackie/Behringer Lawsuit." Retrieved on 8 September 2009.
  38. . Bailii.org. 23 April 1999. Retrieved 30 December 2011. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help)
  39. . 10 April 2006. Archived from on 19 July 2009. Retrieved 29 December 2009. {{cite web}}: Check |archive-url= value (help); Check |url= value (help)
  40. . Sonicstate.com. Retrieved 30 December 2011. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help)
  41. Cooper, Gary. . Musical instrument industry news. MI Pro. Archived from on 2 May 2011. Retrieved 30 December 2011. {{cite web}}: Check |archive-url= value (help); Check |url= value (help)
  42. March 2020, MusicRadar03. "Behringer forced to apologise after bullying row". MusicRadar. Retrieved 7 March 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  43. March 2020, MusicRadar04. "Behringer deletes 'CorkSniffer' apology as Peter Kirn tells people not to smash up their synths". MusicRadar. Retrieved 7 March 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)

External links

Categories: