| Revision as of 23:01, 2 August 2021 editFormalDude (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers31,511 edits →[]: new sectionTags: Reverted New topic← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:01, 2 August 2021 edit undoFormalDude (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers31,511 editsm →Philosophical logicTag: RevertedNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| == ] == | == ] == | ||
| Since you have advanced training in logic, might I ask that you offer some contributions to the stub article ]? It is a hell of a topic to only have two paragraphs on. |
Since you have advanced training in logic, might I ask that you offer some contributions to the stub article ]? It is a hell of a topic to only have two paragraphs on. ––]<sup>(])</sup> 23:01, 2 August 2021 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:01, 2 August 2021
I apologize to those whom I have insulted or denigrated on this page. Unless this comment violates some policy, I will leave it here as a reminder to myself not to engage in such behavior again. -- Jibal (talk) 23:14, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
spam
People who spam me with notifications by posting bogus warnings and then removing them are banned from this page. Do it again and I will seek sanctions. -- Jibal (talk) 15:00, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Philosophical logic
Since you have advanced training in logic, might I ask that you offer some contributions to the stub article Philosophical logic? It is a hell of a topic to only have two paragraphs on. ––𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲 23:01, 2 August 2021 (UTC)