Misplaced Pages

Polyamory: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:10, 3 August 2021 editGhostInTheMachine (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers85,359 editsm Move SD to top per MOS:ORDERTag: Reverted← Previous edit Revision as of 01:27, 4 August 2021 edit undoLegitimus (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers5,216 edits rv, blanking of large, sourced areas. Explanations insufficient.Tag: Manual revertNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Practice of or desire for intimate relationships with more than one partner}}
{{Redirect|Polyamorous|the Breaking Benjamin song|Polyamorous (song)|the reality TV show|Polyamory: Married & Dating}} {{Redirect|Polyamorous|the Breaking Benjamin song|Polyamorous (song)|the reality TV show|Polyamory: Married & Dating}}
{{Short description| Practice of or desire for intimate relationships with more than one partner}}
{{Polyamory sidebar|all}}{{Use mdy dates|date=February 2015}} {{Polyamory sidebar|all}}{{Use mdy dates|date=February 2015}}


Line 100: Line 100:
In March 2021, Google's ] suspended #open, a polyamorous ], saying that the app was violating Google's rules against "sexual content" and ], a decision appealed by the app's co-founders, Amanda Wilson and David Epstein.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.vice.com/en/article/z3vdpj/google-play-store-bans-polyamory-dating-app |title=Google Play Store Suspends Polyamory Dating App |last=Cole |first=Samantha |date=March 12, 2021 |website=] |access-date=March 13, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210313094643/https://www.vice.com/en/article/z3vdpj/google-play-store-bans-polyamory-dating-app |archive-date=March 13, 2021 |url-status=live }}</ref> The app was reportedly used by thousands of users. The app, according to Hannah Szafranski, social media manager for #open, has also been banned from advertising on ] and ]. In March 2021, Google's ] suspended #open, a polyamorous ], saying that the app was violating Google's rules against "sexual content" and ], a decision appealed by the app's co-founders, Amanda Wilson and David Epstein.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.vice.com/en/article/z3vdpj/google-play-store-bans-polyamory-dating-app |title=Google Play Store Suspends Polyamory Dating App |last=Cole |first=Samantha |date=March 12, 2021 |website=] |access-date=March 13, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210313094643/https://www.vice.com/en/article/z3vdpj/google-play-store-bans-polyamory-dating-app |archive-date=March 13, 2021 |url-status=live }}</ref> The app was reportedly used by thousands of users. The app, according to Hannah Szafranski, social media manager for #open, has also been banned from advertising on ] and ].


==Acceptance by religions==
==Religious views==
{{See also|Fornication|Polygamy#Religious attitudes to polygamy|Polyandry#Religious attitudes}} {{See also|Fornication|Polygamy#Religious attitudes to polygamy|Polyandry#Religious attitudes}}

Religious views on polyamory vary. The major ] (Christianity, Islam, and Judaism) all generally reject extramarital sex, although Islam allows ]. Some religious such as paganism and Buddhism are more open to polyamory. Most participants in a study by psychologist
Elisabeth A. Sheff did not practice any religion.<ref>{{cite web |title=Religious Attitudes Towards Polyamory {{!}} Psychology Today |url=https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-polyamorists-next-door/201401/religious-attitudes-towards-polyamory |website=www.psychologytoday.com |access-date=3 August 2021 |language=en}}</ref>


] ]
Line 170: Line 167:
Polyamory Day is celebrated every year on November 23; that day was chosen because on November 23, 2011, the Supreme Court of British Columbia ruled that the anti-polygamy law of Canada does not affect unformalized polyamorous households.<ref name="auto3"/> Polyamory Day is celebrated every year on November 23; that day was chosen because on November 23, 2011, the Supreme Court of British Columbia ruled that the anti-polygamy law of Canada does not affect unformalized polyamorous households.<ref name="auto3"/>


==Polyamory rights organizations==
] ]


The Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Association (CPAA) was founded in 2009. It "advocates on behalf of Canadians who practice polyamory. It promotes legal, social, government, and institutional acceptance and support of polyamory, and advances the interests of the Canadian polyamorous community generally."<ref name="auto2">{{cite web|author=Alan M. |url=https://polyinthemedia.blogspot.com/2010/11/as-canadian-poly-case-nears-publicity.html |title=Polyamory in the News: As Canadian poly case nears, publicity ramps up |publisher=Polyinthemedia |date=November 11, 2010 |access-date=April 29, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201224181534/https://polyinthemedia.blogspot.com/2010/11/as-canadian-poly-case-nears-publicity.html |archive-date=December 24, 2020 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="auto4">{{cite web|url=http://polyadvocacy.ca/about/ |title=About |publisher=Polyadvocacy.ca |access-date=December 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201224181915/http://polyadvocacy.ca/about/ |archive-date=December 24, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref>
==Research==

The Polyamory Action Lobby (PAL) was founded in 2013 in Australia to fight cultural misconceptions about polyamorous people and to fight for their legal rights.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://cityhubsydney.com.au/2013/02/polyamorists-get-organised/|title=Polyamorists set up lobby group|first=Jason|last=Marshall|date=February 6, 2013}}</ref>

The Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition (PLAC), based in the United States, "seeks to advance the civil and human rights of polyamorous individuals, communities, and families through legislative advocacy, public policy, and public education."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://polyamorylegal.org/|title=Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition|website=Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.facebook.com/pages/category/Legal/PolyamoryLegal/about/|title=Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition|website=www.facebook.com}}</ref>

] (UUPA) was founded in 2001. It "has as its mission to serve the Unitarian Universalist Association and the community of polyamorous people within and outside the UUA by providing support, promoting education, and encouraging spiritual wholeness regarding polyamory."<ref name="auto1"/>

==Criticism==
], a co-founder of ], an ] collective of ] and ] writers, thinkers, and artists, criticized polyamory. She argued that polyamory does not make someone ],<ref>{{cite podcast |url=https://www.listennotes.com/id/podcasts/unpopular-front/content-warning-bunker-w-8DwlKoRmy-G/?fbclid=IwAR3Z7Zm9I2CHTsvDyTnazRnSW-cET6JGML6SO4qQm8G3RjoEb0xQwL5gm30 |title=Content Warning: Bunker w/ Yasmin Nair (3.2.19) |website=Unpopular Front |publisher=Listen Notes |host=Ben Udashen |date=March 2, 2019 |access-date=December 27, 2020 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20201227163502/https://www.listennotes.com/id/podcasts/unpopular-front/content-warning-bunker-w-8DwlKoRmy-G/?fbclid=IwAR3Z7Zm9I2CHTsvDyTnazRnSW-cET6JGML6SO4qQm8G3RjoEb0xQwL5gm30 |archive-date=December 27, 2020 }}</ref> said that the discourse around polyamory is tiring and not liberating, only ] a "peculiar form of monogamy...and long-term relationships"<ref>{{cite web |url=https://yasminnair.com/newt-gingrich-polyamorist/ |title=Newt Gingrich: Polyamorist? |last=Nair |first=Yasmin |date=January 19, 2012 |website=Yasmin Nair's official website |publisher=] |access-date=December 27, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201227163051/https://yasminnair.com/newt-gingrich-polyamorist/ |archive-date=December 27, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> and said that she does not care "whether or not the ] polyamory or polygamy".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://yasminnair.com/your-sex-is-not-radical/ |title=Your Sex Is Not Radical |last=Nair |first=Yasmin |date=June 28, 2015 |website=Yasmin Nair's official website |publisher=] |access-date=December 27, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200623145356/https://yasminnair.com/your-sex-is-not-radical/ |archive-date=June 23, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> Elsewhere she called current interest in polyamory and ] is a discourse which "retains power within a very particular set of social orderings,"<ref>{{cite web |url=https://yasminnair.com/on-power-couples/ |title=On Power Couples |last=Nair |first=Yasmin |date=November 15, 2015 |website=Yasmin Nair's official website |publisher=] |access-date=December 27, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201227162611/https://yasminnair.com/on-power-couples/ |archive-date=December 27, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> stated that recognizing polygamous and polyamorous relationships will not "fix all our problems"<ref>{{cite web |url=https://yasminnair.com/weekly-roundup-november-22/ |title=Weekly Roundup: November 22 |last=Nair |first=Yasmin |date=November 23, 2015 |website=Yasmin Nair's official website |publisher=] |access-date=December 27, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201227162435/https://yasminnair.com/weekly-roundup-november-22/ |archive-date=December 27, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> and said that she does not understand polyamory because she is an "old-fashioned ] who sometimes ]," using sex as an "ice-breaker with strangers".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://yasminnair.com/friendship-in-the-time-of-love/ |title=Friendship in the Time of Love |last=Nair |first=Yasmin |date=February 14, 2008 |website=Yasmin Nair's official website |publisher=] |access-date=December 27, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201101132210/https://yasminnair.com/friendship-in-the-time-of-love/ |archive-date=November 1, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> In February 2019, she offered other critique, saying that polyamory "fills the void left by ]" and called it "effectively ] for straight people" because it is similar in its "gloss of alterity".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://yasminnair.com/polyamory-is-gay-marriage-for-straight-people/ |title=Polyamory Is Gay Marriage for Straight People |last=Nair |first=Yasmin |date=February 12, 2019 |website=Yasmin Nair's official website |publisher=] |access-date=December 27, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201114194617/https://yasminnair.com/polyamory-is-gay-marriage-for-straight-people/ |archive-date=December 27, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> She further argued that polyamory is not ] and said that, in her view, "it ultimately serves to shore up a hierarchy of relationships" and is pretentious, while stating that polyamory is becoming a ] for a "combination of ]-]-]". ] also penned a criticism in '']'' that said that while she does not care how people organize their relationships, the "co-opting and rebranding of polygamy" is disturbing, while also stating that the idea of non-monogamy was actually developed by ] from the 1970s and later as a way "to challenge patriarchal heterosexuality".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/26/polyamory-no-favours-for-women |title=Rebranding polyamory does women no favours |last=Bindel |first=Julie |author-link=Julie Bindel|date=August 26, 2013 |website=] |access-date=December 27, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201227170332/https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/26/polyamory-no-favours-for-women |archive-date=December 27, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> She further argued that "modern proponents of polyamory tend to ignore gender dynamics " and called polyamory the choice of "overwhelmingly white, affluent, university educated and privileged folk" who have too much time on their hands. The ] '']'' claimed that "widespread acceptance of polyamory could make society worse off" with supposed false notions of ].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/01/polyamory-elevating-sexual-desires-over-obligations-has-predictable-consequences/ |title=The Counterfeit 'Honesty' of Polyamory |last1=Frost |first1=Daniel |last2=Boyd |first2=Hal |date=January 7, 2010 |website=] |access-date=December 27, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201227170833/https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/01/polyamory-elevating-sexual-desires-over-obligations-has-predictable-consequences/ |archive-date=December 27, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> ] of '']'' said that while he would welcome a polyamorous family as neighbors, it would not make sense to call their arrangement a ] with the ] and ] that came with it, and opposed normalizing ].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/07/case-against-polygamy/397823/ |title=The Case Against Encouraging Polygamy |last1=Friedersdorf |first1=Conor |date=July 9, 2015 |website=] |access-date=December 27, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201227171638/https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/07/case-against-polygamy/397823/ |archive-date=December 27, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref>


Scientific study of psychological well-being and relationship satisfaction for participants in polyamory has been limited due to mostly being a "hidden population". While some results could be interpreted as positive, these findings often suffer from bias and methodological issues.<ref name="Rubel Bogaert">{{cite journal | last1=Rubel | first1=Alicia N. | last2=Bogaert | first2=Anthony F. | s2cid=36510972 | title=Consensual Nonmonogamy: Psychological Well-Being and Relationship Quality Correlates | journal=The Journal of Sex Research | volume=52 | issue=9 | date=September 4, 2014 | issn=0022-4499 | doi=10.1080/00224499.2014.942722 | pmid=25189189 | pages=961–982}}</ref> A significant number of studies rely on ], often recruited from referrals, ], and websites devoted to polyamory.<ref name="Rubel Bogaert"/> Individuals recruited in this manner tend to be relatively homogeneous in terms of values, beliefs, and demographics, which limits the generalizability of the findings. These samples also tend to be ] toward individuals with positive experiences, whereas those who found polyamory to be distressing or hurtful might be more reluctant to participate in the research.<ref name="Rubel Bogaert"/> Most of the studies rely entirely on ]. Generally, self-reports of the degree of well-being and relationship satisfaction over time are flawed, and are often based on belief rather than actual experience.<ref name="Rubel Bogaert"/> Self-report measures are also at risk of ] bias, as subjects may feel pressure to give positive responses about their well-being and relationship satisfaction in the face of ].<ref name="Rubel Bogaert"/> This disparity was noted by Amy C. Moors, ], Robin S. Edelstein, and William J. Chopik (2014), who compared respondents expressing interest in consensual non-monogamy drawn from the general population to those drawn from online communities devoted to discussing positive aspects of non-monogamy.<ref name="MoorsConley2014">{{cite journal|last1=Moors|first1=Amy|last2=Conley|first2=Terri |author-link2=Terri Conley|last3=Edelstein|first3=Robin|last4=Chopik|first4=William|s2cid=146417288|year=2014|title=Attached to monogamy? Avoidance predicts willingness to engage (but not actual engagement) in consensual non-monogamy|journal=Journal of Social and Personal Relationships|volume=32|issue=2|pages=222–240|doi=10.1177/0265407514529065|issn=0265-4075}}</ref> In particular, it was noted that individuals with inclinations toward consensual non-monogamy in the general population sample were robustly correlated with having an ]. Scientific study of psychological well-being and relationship satisfaction for participants in polyamory has been limited due to mostly being a "hidden population". While some results could be interpreted as positive, these findings often suffer from bias and methodological issues.<ref name="Rubel Bogaert">{{cite journal | last1=Rubel | first1=Alicia N. | last2=Bogaert | first2=Anthony F. | s2cid=36510972 | title=Consensual Nonmonogamy: Psychological Well-Being and Relationship Quality Correlates | journal=The Journal of Sex Research | volume=52 | issue=9 | date=September 4, 2014 | issn=0022-4499 | doi=10.1080/00224499.2014.942722 | pmid=25189189 | pages=961–982}}</ref> A significant number of studies rely on ], often recruited from referrals, ], and websites devoted to polyamory.<ref name="Rubel Bogaert"/> Individuals recruited in this manner tend to be relatively homogeneous in terms of values, beliefs, and demographics, which limits the generalizability of the findings. These samples also tend to be ] toward individuals with positive experiences, whereas those who found polyamory to be distressing or hurtful might be more reluctant to participate in the research.<ref name="Rubel Bogaert"/> Most of the studies rely entirely on ]. Generally, self-reports of the degree of well-being and relationship satisfaction over time are flawed, and are often based on belief rather than actual experience.<ref name="Rubel Bogaert"/> Self-report measures are also at risk of ] bias, as subjects may feel pressure to give positive responses about their well-being and relationship satisfaction in the face of ].<ref name="Rubel Bogaert"/> This disparity was noted by Amy C. Moors, ], Robin S. Edelstein, and William J. Chopik (2014), who compared respondents expressing interest in consensual non-monogamy drawn from the general population to those drawn from online communities devoted to discussing positive aspects of non-monogamy.<ref name="MoorsConley2014">{{cite journal|last1=Moors|first1=Amy|last2=Conley|first2=Terri |author-link2=Terri Conley|last3=Edelstein|first3=Robin|last4=Chopik|first4=William|s2cid=146417288|year=2014|title=Attached to monogamy? Avoidance predicts willingness to engage (but not actual engagement) in consensual non-monogamy|journal=Journal of Social and Personal Relationships|volume=32|issue=2|pages=222–240|doi=10.1177/0265407514529065|issn=0265-4075}}</ref> In particular, it was noted that individuals with inclinations toward consensual non-monogamy in the general population sample were robustly correlated with having an ].

Revision as of 01:27, 4 August 2021

"Polyamorous" redirects here. For the Breaking Benjamin song, see Polyamorous (song). For the reality TV show, see Polyamory: Married & Dating. Practice of or desire for intimate relationships with more than one partner
Part of a series on
Non-monogamy
and polyamory
Relationships
Sexual practices
Terms and values
Related topics

Polyamory (from Greek πολύ poly, "many", and Latin amor, "love") is the practice of, or desire for, intimate relationships with more than one partner, with the informed consent of all partners involved. People who identify as polyamorous may believe in open relationships with a conscious management of jealousy and reject the view that sexual and relational exclusivity are necessary for deep, committed, long-term loving relationships. Others prefer to restrict their sexual activity to only members of the group, a closed polyamorous relationship which is usually referred to as polyfidelity.

Polyamory has come to be an umbrella term for various forms of non-monogamous, multi-partner relationships, or non-exclusive sexual or romantic relationships. Its usage reflects the choices and philosophies of the individuals involved, but with recurring themes or values, such as love, intimacy, honesty, integrity, equality, communication, and commitment.

Polyamory Polycule Symbol
Polyamory Pride Flag by Mollymakesthings
The most known polyamory pride flag design, created by Jim Evans in 1995

Terminology

Main article: Terminology within polyamory

The word polyamorous first appeared in an article by Morning Glory Zell-Ravenheart, "A Bouquet of Lovers", published in May 1990 in Green Egg Magazine, as "poly-amorous". In May 1992, Jennifer L. Wesp created the Usenet newsgroup alt.polyamory, and the Oxford English Dictionary cites the proposal to create that group as the first verified appearance of the word. In 1999, Zell-Ravenheart was asked by the editor of the OED to provide a definition of the term, and she provided it for the UK version as "the practice, state or ability of having more than one sexual loving relationship at the same time, with the full knowledge and consent of all partners involved." The words polyamory, polyamorous, and polyamorist were added to the OED in 2006.

Some reference works define "polyamory" as a relational form (whether interpersonal or romantic or sexual) that involves multiple people with the consent of all the people involved, like Oxford Living Dictionaries, Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary & Thesaurus, and Dictionary.com. Some criticized the Merriam-Webster definition of polyamory, which defines the term as "the state or practice of having more than one open romantic relationship at a time," as missing a "vital component": consent.

The word polyamory combines the Greek word for many (poly) and the Latin word for love (amor).

As a practice


Relationships
(Outline)
Types
Genetic or adoptive
By marriage
Partner(s)
Intimate and sexual
Activities
Endings
Emotions and feelings
Practices
Abuse
Polyamorous people parading under their banner at Pride in London 2016 with two furries in front of them in June 2016

Consensual non-monogamy, which polyamory falls under, can take many different forms, depending on the needs and preferences of the individual(s) involved in any specific relationship(s). As of 2019, over one fifth of the United States population has, at some point in their lives, engaged in some sort of consensual non-monogamy.

Separate from polyamory as a philosophical basis for relationships are the practical ways in which people who live polyamorously arrange their lives and handle certain issues, as compared to those of a more conventional monogamous arrangement. People of different sexual orientations are a part of the community and form networks of relationships, with consent and agreement of their partners. Many things differentiate polyamory from other types of non-monogamous relationships. It is common for swinging and open couples to maintain emotional monogamy while engaging in extra-dyadic sexual relations. Similarly, the friend/partner boundary in monogamous relationships and other forms of non-monogamy is typically fairly clear. Unlike other forms of non-monogamy, though, "polyamory is notable for privileging emotional intimacy with others." Benefits of a polyamorous relationship might include: the ability of individuals to discuss issues with multiple partners, potentially mediating and thus stabilizing a relationship, and reducing polarization of viewpoints, and emotional support and structure from other committed adults within the familial unit. Other benefits include a wider range of adult experience, skills, resources, and perspective and support for companionate marriages, which can be satisfying even if no longer sexually vital, since romantic needs are met elsewhere. This acts to preserve existing relationships. A final benefit is more emotional, intellectual and sexual needs met as part of the understanding that one person cannot be expected to provide them all. Conversely, polyamory offers release from the monogamist expectation that one person must meet all of an individual's needs (sex, emotional support, primary friendship, intellectual stimulation, companionship, social presentation).

Polyamorous communities are present in countries within Europe, North America, Oceania, South America, Asia, and Africa. The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction estimating that there were half-a-million "openly polyamorous families" in the United States in July 2009. Additionally, 15-28% of heterosexual couples and about half of gay and bisexual people have a "non-traditional" arrangement of some kind as reported in The Guardian in August 2013. Polyamorous communities have been said to be outwardly feminist as women were central to the creation of such communities and gender equality is a central tenet. For those who are polyamorous, social distancing, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, created ripples in existing relationships, leading some to split apart and others to struggle to maintain their connections with one another.

Values

Main article: Values within polyamory

Fidelity and loyalty

The picture shows three people in a polyamorous relationship. It was taken within a research project at the University of Vienna in May 2016.

A large percentage of polyamorists define fidelity not as sexual exclusivity, but as faithfulness to the promises and agreements made about a relationship. As a relational practice, polyamory sustains a vast variety of open relationship or multi-partner constellations, which can differ in definition and grades of intensity, closeness and commitment. Specifically, polyamory can take the forms of a triad of three people in an intimate relationship, a poly family of more than three people, one person as the pivot point of a relationship (a "vee"), a couple in a two-person relationship which portrays other relationships on their own, and various other intimate networks of individuals. There are also those who are swingers and engage in polyamory, or engage in poly-dating. A poly family is sometimes called "kitchen table polyamory", a style of polyamory in which all members of a particular polycule are comfortable and connected enough with each other that it is not uncommon for them to literally gather around the kitchen table, as they may spend holidays, birthdays, or other important times together as a large group. This style places an emphasis on family-style connections, not all members are necessarily sexually or romantically involved with every other person in the group. Other styles of polyamory include parallel polyamory where members of individual relationships prefer not to meet or know details of their partners' other relationships, and solo polyamory in which the individual has or is comfortable with having multiple intimate (romantic or sexual) relationships without wanting to cohabit or "nest" with any one partner, eschewing the "relationship escalator" which holds that relationships must follow a progression, or "escalator" from dating, to being exclusive, to becoming engaged, getting married and having children. For some, polyamory functions as an umbrella term for the multiple approaches of 'responsible non-monogamy'. A secret sexual relationship that violates those accords would be seen as a breach of fidelity. Polyamorists generally base definitions of commitment on considerations other than sexual exclusivity, e.g. "trust and honesty" or "growing old together". In an article in Men's Health, Zachary Zane states that commitment in a polyamorous relationship means that "you will be there for that person", supporting them taking care of them, and loving them.

Communication and negotiation

Because there is no "standard model" for polyamorous relationships, and reliance upon common expectations may not be realistic, polyamorists advocate explicitly negotiating with all involved to establish the terms of their relationships, and often emphasize that this should be an ongoing process of honest communication and respect. Polyamorists typically take a pragmatic approach to their relationships; many accept that sometimes they and their partners will make mistakes and fail to live up to these ideals, and that communication is important for repairing any breaches. They also argue that polyamory is a response to challenges of relationships of a monogamous nature.

Trust, honesty, dignity, and respect

Polyamory has been defined as loving more than one person at once, with respect, trust, and honesty for all partners involved. Ideally, a partner's partners are accepted as part of that person's life rather than merely tolerated, and usually a relationship that requires deception or a "don't ask don't tell" policy is seen as a less than ideal model. Out additionally described polyamory as "not a sexuality" but as actually "having multiple intimate relationships".

Non-possessiveness

Some polyamorists view excessive restrictions on other deep relationships as less than desirable, as such restrictions can be used to replace trust with a framework of ownership and control. It is usually preferred or encouraged that a polyamorist strive to view their partners' other significant others, often referred to as metamours or OSOs, in terms of the gain to their partners' lives rather than a threat to their own (see compersion). Therefore, jealousy and possessiveness are generally viewed not so much as something to avoid or structure the relationships around, but as responses that should be explored, understood, and resolved within each individual, with compersion as a goal. This is related to one of the types of polyamory, which is non-hierarchal, where "no one relationship is prioritized above the rest" and the fact that polyamorists insist working through problems in their relationships "through open communication, patience, and honesty".

Compersion

See also: Mudita

Compersion is an empathetic state of happiness and joy experienced when another individual experiences happiness and joy. In the context of polyamorous relationships, it describes positive feelings experienced by an individual when their intimate partner is enjoying another relationship. Some have called it "the opposite or flip side of jealousy", is analogous to the "joy parents feel when their children get married", and a "positive emotional reaction to a lover's other relationship". The concept of compersion was originally coined by the Kerista Commune in San Francisco.

Difficulties

Michael McClure and Kamala Devi (polyamorists) captured from EBS DOCUPRIME in November 2016

Polyamory, along with other forms of consensual non-monogamy, is not without drawbacks. Morin (1999) and Fleckenstein (2014) noted that certain conditions are favorable to good experiences with polyamory, but that these differ from the general population. Heavy public promotion of polyamory can have the unintended effect of attracting people to it for whom it is not well-suited. Unequal power dynamics, such as financial dependence, can also inappropriately influence a person to agree to a polyamorous relationship against their true desires. Even in more equal power dynamic relationships, the reluctant partner may feel coerced into a proposed non-monogamous arrangement due to the implication that if they refuse, the proposer will pursue other partners anyway, will break off the relationship, or that the one refusing will be accused of intolerance.

Polyamorous relationships present practical pitfalls. One common complaint from participants is time management, as more partners means one must divide one's time and attention up between them, leaving less for each. Related is that the complexity of the arrangement can lead to so much effort being spent on the relationship that personal, individual needs can be overlooked. The strong emphasis on communication can unintentionally marginalize partners who are less articulate. Finally, negotiating the sometimes complex rules and boundaries of these relationships can be emotionally taxing, as can reconciling situations where one partner goes outside those boundaries. Some therapists argue that polyamory is not good for relationships, saying it is a "recipe for hurt, disappointment, jealousy, and breakups".

Legal issues and legal recognition

People with polyamory flags in Malmö, Sweden, in August 2017

In 1998, a Tennessee court granted guardianship of a child to her grandmother and step-grandfather after the child's mother April Divilbiss and partners outed themselves as polyamorous on MTV. After contesting the decision for two years, Divilbiss eventually agreed to relinquish her daughter, acknowledging that she was unable to adequately care for her child and that this, rather than her polyamory, had been the grandparents' real motivation in seeking custody.

In 2010, Ann Tweedy, a legal scholar, argued that polyamory could be considered a sexual orientation under existing United States law. This argument was opposed by Christian Keese, who wrote in 2016 that advocating a "sexual orientation model of polyamory is likely to reduce the complexity and transformative potential of poly intimacies," while also limiting reach and scope of possible litigation, obstruct the ability of poly activists to form alliances with other groups, and increase the possibility that poly activists will have to settle for legal solutions which are "exclusive and reproductive of a culture of privilege".

In 2016, writer Rebecca Ruth Gould called for non-monogamy, including polyamory, to receive "the legal recognition it deserves", saying that polyamory remains a "negative identity".

In 2017, three men became the first family in the state of California to have names of three dads "on their child's birth certificate". In later years, they had legal challenges and in 2020 published a book about their experiences titled Three Dads and a Baby.

In June 2018, a court in Newfoundland and Labrador recognized three unmarried adults as legal parents of a child who was born within the polyamorous family they had formed; this was believed to be a first for Canadian law. The three adults included the child's mother and two men; the child's biological father was unknown.

In June 2020, the city council of Somerville, Massachusetts, voted to recognize polyamorous domestic partnerships in the city, becoming the first American city to do so. This measure was passed so that those in a polyamorous relationship would have access to their partners' health insurance amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

In November 2020, the issue of polyamory came to the Supreme Court of Vermont in the form of a dispute between two men and a woman in a polyamorous relationship.

In March 2021, the Cambridge, Massachusetts City Council approved an ordinance amending the city's laws, stipulating that "a domestic partnership needn't only include two partners." The measure was supported by the Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition, also known as PLAC, composed of the Chosen Family Law Center, Harvard Law School LGBTQ+ Advocacy Clinic, and some members on the American Psychological Association's Committee on Consensual Non-Monogamy. This ordinance was originally proposed in July 2020. In April 2021, the adjacent town of Arlington, Massachusetts, also approved domestic partnerships of more than two people, which is now subject to the review of the state Attorney General's office.

Marriage implications

See also: Group marriage, Legality of polygamy, and List of polygamy court cases

Most western countries do not recognize polygamous marriages, and consider bigamy a crime. Several countries also prohibit people from living a polygamous lifestyle. This is the case in some states of the United States where the criminalization of a polygamous lifestyle originated as anti-Mormon laws, although they are rarely enforced. Having multiple non-marital partners, even if married to one, is legal in most U.S. jurisdictions; at most it constitutes grounds for divorce if the spouse is non-consenting, or feels that the interest in a further partner has destabilized the marriage. In some jurisdictions, like North Carolina, a spouse can sue a third party for causing "loss of affection" in or "criminal conversation" (adultery) with their spouse, while more than twenty states in the US have laws against adultery, although they are infrequently enforced due to the Supreme Court's ruling in Lawrence v. Texas.

Polyamory, however, is on a continuum of family-bonds that includes group marriage and it does not refer to bigamy as long as no claim to being married in formal legal terms is made. The Social History of the American Family: An Encyclopedia (2014, edited by Marilyn J. Coleman and Lawrence H. Ganong) stated that under existing U.S. federal law, a polyamorous relationship is legal in all 50 states while polygamy is not. On November 23, 2011, the Supreme Court of British Columbia ruled that the anti-polygamy law of Canada does not affect unformalized polyamorous households; this is why Polyamory Day is celebrated every year on November 23. Even so, those in polyamorous relationships often face legal challenges when it comes to custody, morality clauses, adultery and bigamy laws, housing, and where they live.

In 2012, legal scholar Deborah Anapol called for the revision of existing U.S. laws against bigamy to permit married persons to enter into additional marriages, provided that they have first given legal notice to their existing marital partner or partners, with a "dyadic networks" model. In 2015, another legal scholar, Ronald C. Den Otter, wrote in the Emory Law Journal (in the article "Three May Not Be a Crowd: The Case for a Constitutional Right to Plural Marriage") that in the United States the constitutional rights of due process and equal protection fully support marriage rights for polyamorous families.

During a PinkNews question-and-answer session in May 2015, Redfern Jon Barrett questioned Natalie Bennett, leader of the Green Party of England and Wales, about her party's stance towards polyamorous marriage rights. Bennett responded by saying that her party is "open" to discussion on the idea of civil partnership or marriages between three people. Bennett's announcement aroused media controversy on the topic and led to major international news outlets covering her answer. A follow-up article written by Barrett was published by PinkNews on May 4, 2015, further exploring the topic. In most countries, it is legal for three or more people to form and share a sexual relationship (subject sometimes to laws against homosexuality or adultery if two of the three are married). With only minor exceptions no developed countries permit marriage among more than two people, nor do the majority of countries give legal protection (e.g., of rights relating to children) to non-married partners. Individuals involved in polyamorous relationships are generally considered by the law to be no different from people who live together, or "date", under other circumstances. In 2017, John Alejandro Rodriguez, Victor Hugo Prada, and Manuel Jose Bermudez became Colombia's first polyamorous family to have a legally recognized relationship, though not a marriage, as by Colombian law, marriage is between two people, so they instead called it a "special patrimonial union". Some have called for domestic partnership laws to be expanded to include polyamorous couples and have said that marriage-like entitlements should apply to such couples.

In later years, in the debate over same-sex marriage, neither those for nor those against it favored polygamy itself, with agreement that multiparty marriage should remain impossible. In the case of polyamory, which is different from polygyny, there was little public debate about its existence. This is because some advocates of same-sex marriage became leery of associating with polyamory because they thought it would "give their enemies ammunition". If marriage is intended, some countries provide for both a religious marriage and a civil ceremony (sometimes combined). These recognize and formalize the relationship. Few countries outside of Africa or Asia give legal recognition to marriages with three or more partners. While a relationship of three people being formalized in the Netherlands in 2005 was read by some conservatives as demonstrating that Dutch law permitted multiple-partner civil unions, the relationship in question was a samenlevingscontract, or "cohabitation contract", and not a registered partnership or marriage. The Netherlands' law concerning registered partnerships provides that a person may be involved in one only registered partnership with one other person whether of the same or of opposite sex at any one time, and that persons who enter into a registered partnership may not at the same time be married.

Prevalence

Preparations for Polyamory Pride at CSD Parade in Graz, Austria, in June 2017

Research into the prevalence of polyamory has been limited. A comprehensive government study of sexual attitudes, behaviors and relationships in Finland in 1992 (age 18–75, around 50% female and male) found that around 200 out of 2250 (8.9%) respondents "agreed or strongly agreed" with the statement "I could maintain several sexual relationships at the same time" and 8.2% indicated a relationship type "that best suits" at the present stage of life would involve multiple partners. By contrast, when asked about other relationships at the same time as a steady relationship, around 17% stated they had had other partners while in a steady relationship (50% no, 17% yes, 33% refused to answer). Additionally, dating apps like #Open, Feeld, and OkCupid are polyamorous-friendly.

The article What Psychology Professionals Should Know About Polyamory (by Geri Weitzman) based on a paper presented at the 8th Annual Diversity Conference in March 1999 in Albany, New York, states that while openly polyamorous relationships are relatively rare there are "indications that private polyamorous arrangements within relationships are actually quite common." They also note, citing 1983 study of 3,574 married couples in their sample that "15–28% had an understanding that allows nonmonogamy under some circumstances," with percentages are higher among "cohabitating couples (28%), lesbian couples (29%) and gay male couples (65%)." According to Jessica Fern, a psychologist and the author of Polysecure: Attachment, Trauma and Consensual Nonmonogamy, as of September 2020, about 4% of Americans, nearly 16 million people, are "practising a non-monogamous style of relationship".

In March 2021, Google's Play Store suspended #open, a polyamorous dating app, saying that the app was violating Google's rules against "sexual content" and profanity, a decision appealed by the app's co-founders, Amanda Wilson and David Epstein. The app was reportedly used by thousands of users. The app, according to Hannah Szafranski, social media manager for #open, has also been banned from advertising on Instagram and Facebook.

Acceptance by religions

See also: Fornication, Polygamy § Religious attitudes to polygamy, and Polyandry § Religious attitudes
Land of Oneida Community between 1865 and 1875

The Oneida Community in the 1800s in New York (a Christian religious commune) believed strongly in a system of free love known as a complex marriage, where any member was free to have sex with any other who consented. In 1993, the archives of the community were made available to scholars for the first time. Contained within the archives was the journal of Tirzah Miller, Noyes' niece, who wrote extensively about her romantic and sexual relations with other members of Oneida.

Some Christians are polyamorous, but mainstream Christianity does not accept polyamory. In 2017, the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, an evangelical Christian organization, released a manifesto on human sexuality known as the "Nashville Statement". The statement was signed by 150 evangelical leaders, and includes 14 points of belief. Among other things, it states, "We deny that God has designed marriage to be a homosexual, polygamous, or polyamorous relationship."

Some Jews are polyamorous, but mainstream Judaism does not accept polyamory. However, in 2010, Rabbi Jacob Levin came out as polyamorous to his synagogue's board in California without losing his job as rabbi. As well, in his book A Guide to Jewish Practice: Volume 1 – Everyday Living (2011), Rabbi David Teutsch wrote, "It is not obvious that monogamy is automatically a morally higher form of relationship than polygamy," and that if practiced with honesty, flexibility, egalitarian rules, and trust, practitioners may "live enriched lives as a result". In 2013, Sharon Kleinbaum, the senior rabbi at Congregation Beit Simchat Torah in New York, said that polyamory is a choice that does not preclude a Jewishly observant and socially conscious life. Some polyamorous Jews point to biblical patriarchs having multiple wives and concubines as evidence that polyamorous relationships can be sacred in Judaism. An email list is dedicated to polyamorous Jews; it is called AhavaRaba, which roughly translates to "big love" in Hebrew, and which echoes God's "great" or "abounding" love mentioned in the Ahava rabbah prayer.

LaVeyan Satanism is critical of Abrahamic sexual mores, considering them narrow, restrictive and hypocritical. Satanists are pluralists, accepting polyamorists, bisexuals, lesbians, gays, BDSM, transgender people, and asexuals. Sex is viewed as an indulgence, but one that should only be freely entered into with consent. The Eleven Satanic Rules of the Earth only give two instructions regarding sex: "Do not make sexual advances unless you are given the mating signal" and "Do not harm little children", though the latter is much broader and encompasses physical and other abuse. This has always been consistent part of CoS policy since its inception in 1966. Magister Peter H. Gillmore wrote in an essay supporting same-sex marriage that some people try to suggest that their attitude on sexuality is "anything goes" even though they have a principle of "responsibility to the responsible". He also stated that the Church of Satan's philosophy "strictly forbids sexual activity with children as well as with non-human animals."

Unitarian Universalists for Polyamory Awareness, founded in 2001, has engaged in ongoing education and advocacy for greater understanding and acceptance of polyamory within the Unitarian Universalist Association. At the 2014 General Assembly, two UUPA members moved to include the category of "family and relationship structures" in the UUA's nondiscrimination rule, along with other amendments; the package of proposed amendments was ratified by the GA delegates.

Acceptance by non-religious organizations

In 2018, the Association of Humanistic Rabbis issued "A STATEMENT ON SEXUAL ETHICS FOR THE 21st CENTURY", which states in part, "We commit to the freedom and empowerment of all adults to full consensual sexual expression, be it monogamous or polyamorous."

In a clinical setting

In 2002, a paper titled Working with polyamorous clients in the clinical setting (by Joy Davidson) addressed various areas of inquiry. This included the importance of talking about alternatives to monogamy, how therapists can work with those who are exploring polyamory, basic understandings of polyamory, and key issues that therapists need to watch for in the course of working with polyamorous clients.

Its conclusions were that "Sweeping changes are occurring in the sexual and relational landscape" (including "dissatisfaction with limitations of serial monogamy, i.e. exchanging one partner for another in the hope of a better outcome"); that clinicians need to start by "recognizing the array of possibilities that 'polyamory' encompasses" and "examine our culturally-based assumption that 'only monogamy is acceptable'" and how this bias impacts on the practice of therapy; the need for self-education about polyamory, basic understandings about the "rewards of the poly lifestyle" and the common social and relationship challenges faced by those involved, and the "shadow side" of polyamory, the potential existing for coercion, strong emotions in opposition, and jealousy. The paper also states that the configurations a therapist would be "most likely to see in practice" are individuals involved in primary-plus arrangements, monogamous couples wishing to explore non-monogamy for the first time, and "poly singles".

In 2002, the rights of polyamorous people were added to the mission of the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom, an American sex-positive advocacy and educational organization; a manual for psychotherapists who deal with polyamorous clients was published by them in September 2009, called What Psychotherapists Should Know About Polyamory (written by Geri Weitzman and others).

The National Coalition for Sexual Freedom manages the Kink And Poly Aware Professionals Directory, which consists of an Internet directory of psychotherapeutic, medical, and other professionals who have volunteered to be contacted by people who are involved in polyamory (and/or BDSM, etc).

The Polyamory-Friendly Professionals Directory is a directory on the Internet “of professionals who are sensitive to the unique needs of polyamorous clientele”; it includes psychologists, therapists, medical professionals, and other professionals.

Media representation

See also: List of fictional polyamorous characters
Cosplay of Starfire at FanimeCon 2015

1980s to 2000s

Starfire, also known as Princess Koriand'r, is a fictional superhero appearing in books published by DC Comics, who debuted in a preview story inserted within DC Comics Presents #26 (October 1980) and was created by Marv Wolfman and George Pérez; she was shown to be a polyamorous character. Starfire was raised on the world of Tamaran where it was acceptable to have an open marriage, and she remained, as argued by some critics, sex-positive and free-thinking, remaining open to polygamous relationships, open sex, and pansexual "free-love" with anyone, often leading to conflict with the more reserved culture and customs on Earth. For Starfire, polyamory was a personal and cultural preference.

In 1989, the anime series Ranma ½ included a polyamorous character, Tatewaki, who is in love with both Akane and the "Pigtail Girl" (Ranma's female form) and proposes to date both, but they do not return his feelings.

In 2002, the Futurama episode "A Taste of Freedom" showed Old Man Waterfall, who is Zoidberg's defense attorney until killed by a giant crab warship, having seven wives and one husband. While Waterfall's case for Zoidberg is unsuccessful, the Supreme Court holds polygamy as legal, though this leads to jeers from spectators. The made-for-TV Futurama film, The Beast with a Billion Backs (published 2008), featured two polyamorous characters: Colleen O'Hallahan and Yivo. Colleen had five boyfriends, Fry, Chu, Ndulu, Schlomo and Bolt Rolands, while Yivo is a planet-sized alien with no determinable gender, dating, then marrying all people of the universe at once. Fry and Colleen eventually break up. Afterwards, Yivo remains in a relationship with Colleen.

The 21st century brought various new forms of representation of polyamory. In 2007, Daniel Help Justice's book Dreyd featured Tarsa, a priestess, warrior, and bisexual woman, as part of a polyamorous love triad. In 2009, Graham Nicholls founded www.polyamory.org.uk, the United Kingdom's first website about polyamory and the Mom of Pina in Maria Pallotta-Chiarolli's novel, Love You Two was shown to be polyamorous and bisexual, leading Pina on a journey to explore the "complex spectrum of sex and love" in humanity itself. In 2010, the series Lost Girl began. It included Bo Dennis, a bisexual succubus which must sustain herself by feeding from the life force of male and female Fae and humans, via oral intake or the energy created through sex. In the first two seasons she was involved romantically with Dyson (a heterosexual shapeshifter) and Lauren (a lesbian human). Later on, Bo tried to have a monogamous relationship with Lauren, with Bo and Lauren remaining in love with each other through ups and downs, and later accepting each other as a couple by the end of the series.

Increased representation in the 2010s

Polyamorous characters appeared in various media in the 2010s. In the 2010 television show Caprica, several main characters are portrayed as being in a polyfidelitous-style marriage consisting of multiple men and women, with each member being equal socially and legally. From 2012 to 2013, the American reality television series on the American pay television network Showtime, Polyamory: Married & Dating, was broadcast. It followed polyamorous families as they navigated the challenges presented by polyamory. Around the same time, the webcomic Kimchi Cuddles began, which portrayed polyamorous people like other characters, "only with more partners to steal their blankets." The following years featured a polyamorous captain in Jacqueline Koyanagi's novel, Ascension, and three characters (Reese, David, and Amber) in a relationship in Malinda Lo's novel, Inheritance. In 2011, American Horror Story: Hotel began, with Countess Elizabeth Johnson, played by Lady Gaga, beginning a relationship with famed film actor Rudolph Valentino and his wife, Natacha Rambova, as seen in episode seven. The following year, the YouTube show The Gay and Wondrous Life of Caleb Gallo would show a couple working through their decision to convert from monogamy to polyamory, like Brian Jordan Alvarez, who considers himself polyamorous.

From 2015 to 2017, in the webcomic Always Human by Ari North, the parents of Sunati (Nisa and Prav) were shown to be in a polyamorous relationship with a man named Vish, who Nisa calls "our boyfriend". In another webcomic, Unknown Lands, which began in 2015, Vard is shown to be polyamorous, along with most of the cast having a queer sexual identity. The webcomic itself has environmental, feminist, and LGBTQ+ themes. A few years later, the 2017 film Professor Marston and the Wonder Women focuses on a polyamorous relationship between a professor, his wife, and their student, Olive, as they share a "workplace, a bed, a home and eventually a family." Furthermore, fiction writer Cassandra Clare stated that Mark Blackthorn in The Dark Artifices book series would "definitely be open to a polyamorous relationship", but would not cheat or lie, while noting that another such relationship between other characters would not be possible. Additionally, writer K. Ancrum confirmed that polyamorous characters were in two of her books (The Wicker King and The Weight of the Stars), but did not name any specific characters. At the same time, Em, best friend of the protagonist in two books by Leigh Matthews (Don't Bang the Barista and Go Deep) is a bisexual woman dating a man in the first book, but by the second book she has "happily settled into a poly triad", wondering how she will get married.

On May 29, 2017, in the last season of Steven Universe, Fluorite, a member of the Off Colors, a fusion of six different gems into one being, with fusion as the physical manifestation of a relationship, was introduced. This character reappeared in various episodes in the show's fifth season ("Lars Head", "Lars of the Stars", "Your Mother and Mine"), the season 5 finale, "Change Your Mind", along with one in Steven Universe Future ("Little Graduation") and in Steven Universe: The Movie, with the latter two as non-speaking appearances. The series creator, Rebecca Sugar, confirmed that Fluorite is a representation of a polyamorous relationship at the show's Comic Con panel in San Diego. Sugar said at the panel, and at another conference, that she was inspired after talking with children at an LBGTQ+ center in Long Beach, California, who wanted a polyamorous character in the show. Steven Universe was not alone in this regard. The fourth season BoJack Horseman, a mature animated series, featured a character named Hollyhock, the sister of the protagonist, who has eight adoptive fathers in a polyamorous gay relationship. The same year, Unicornland premiered, with eight-episode web series focusing on Annie's exploration into polyamory after her divorce.

2018 and beyond

Polyamory was the subject of the 2018 Louis Theroux documentary Love Without Limits, where Theroux travels to Portland, Oregon, to meet a number of people engaged in polyamorous relationships. Also in 2018, 195 Lewis, a web series about a black lesbian couple dealing with their relationship being newly polyamorous, received the Breakthrough Series – Short Form award from the Gotham Awards. The series premiered in 2017 and ran for five episodes. The same year, the comic Open Earth premiered. The comic is set in the future and monogamous relationships are seen as outdated to all the young people on board the space station, all who are polyamorous. Author Sarah Mirk said that she wanted to write a story where "open relationships can be really positive and wonderful" and said that its realistic to believe that people would "explore multiple relationships". She also said she wanted to write a story where it was "totally normal to be queer and genderqueer."

Trigonometry is an eight-part BBC TV drama series which started on March 25, 2020, and is about an existing couple being joined by a third person and forming a polyamorous relationship. The BBC said that Trigonometry is "A love story about three people who are made for each other."

Polyamory-related observances

Start of polyamory contingent at San Francisco Pride 2004

Metamour Day is celebrated every year on February 28th. It celebrates the relationships people have with their metamours (partners' other significant others, often referred to as metamours or OSOs.)

Polyamory Pride Day is celebrated every year on a day in Pride Month.

Polyamory groups sometimes participate in pride parades.

International Solo Polyamory Day is celebrated every year on September 24th. Solo polyamory is a type of polyamory in which an individual has or is comfortable with having multiple intimate (romantic or sexual) relationships without wanting to cohabit or "nest" with any one partner, eschewing the "relationship escalator" which holds that relationships must follow a progression, or "escalator" from dating, to being exclusive, to becoming engaged, getting married and having children.

Polyamory Day is celebrated every year on November 23; that day was chosen because on November 23, 2011, the Supreme Court of British Columbia ruled that the anti-polygamy law of Canada does not affect unformalized polyamorous households.

Polyamory rights organizations

Bridgette Garozzo, spokesperson for the Polyamory Action Lobby, in May 2013

The Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Association (CPAA) was founded in 2009. It "advocates on behalf of Canadians who practice polyamory. It promotes legal, social, government, and institutional acceptance and support of polyamory, and advances the interests of the Canadian polyamorous community generally."

The Polyamory Action Lobby (PAL) was founded in 2013 in Australia to fight cultural misconceptions about polyamorous people and to fight for their legal rights.

The Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition (PLAC), based in the United States, "seeks to advance the civil and human rights of polyamorous individuals, communities, and families through legislative advocacy, public policy, and public education."

Unitarian Universalists for Polyamory Awareness (UUPA) was founded in 2001. It "has as its mission to serve the Unitarian Universalist Association and the community of polyamorous people within and outside the UUA by providing support, promoting education, and encouraging spiritual wholeness regarding polyamory."

Criticism

Yasmin Nair, a co-founder of Against Equality, an anti-capitalist collective of radical queer and trans writers, thinkers, and artists, criticized polyamory. She argued that polyamory does not make someone radical, said that the discourse around polyamory is tiring and not liberating, only fetishizing a "peculiar form of monogamy...and long-term relationships" and said that she does not care "whether or not the state recognises polyamory or polygamy". Elsewhere she called current interest in polyamory and polygamy is a discourse which "retains power within a very particular set of social orderings," stated that recognizing polygamous and polyamorous relationships will not "fix all our problems" and said that she does not understand polyamory because she is an "old-fashioned slut who sometimes has sex with friends," using sex as an "ice-breaker with strangers". In February 2019, she offered other critique, saying that polyamory "fills the void left by gay marriage" and called it "effectively gay marriage for straight people" because it is similar in its "gloss of alterity". She further argued that polyamory is not liberatory and said that, in her view, "it ultimately serves to shore up a hierarchy of relationships" and is pretentious, while stating that polyamory is becoming a way of life for a "combination of hipster-millennial-wealthy-people". Julie Bindel also penned a criticism in The Guardian that said that while she does not care how people organize their relationships, the "co-opting and rebranding of polygamy" is disturbing, while also stating that the idea of non-monogamy was actually developed by radical feminists from the 1970s and later as a way "to challenge patriarchal heterosexuality". She further argued that "modern proponents of polyamory tend to ignore gender dynamics " and called polyamory the choice of "overwhelmingly white, affluent, university educated and privileged folk" who have too much time on their hands. The conservative National Review claimed that "widespread acceptance of polyamory could make society worse off" with supposed false notions of honesty. Conor Friedersdorf of The Atlantic said that while he would welcome a polyamorous family as neighbors, it would not make sense to call their arrangement a civil marriage with the entitlements and rights that came with it, and opposed normalizing group marriage.

Scientific study of psychological well-being and relationship satisfaction for participants in polyamory has been limited due to mostly being a "hidden population". While some results could be interpreted as positive, these findings often suffer from bias and methodological issues. A significant number of studies rely on small samples, often recruited from referrals, snowball sampling, and websites devoted to polyamory. Individuals recruited in this manner tend to be relatively homogeneous in terms of values, beliefs, and demographics, which limits the generalizability of the findings. These samples also tend to be self-selecting toward individuals with positive experiences, whereas those who found polyamory to be distressing or hurtful might be more reluctant to participate in the research. Most of the studies rely entirely on self-report measures. Generally, self-reports of the degree of well-being and relationship satisfaction over time are flawed, and are often based on belief rather than actual experience. Self-report measures are also at risk of self-enhancement bias, as subjects may feel pressure to give positive responses about their well-being and relationship satisfaction in the face of stereotype threat. This disparity was noted by Amy C. Moors, Terri D. Conley, Robin S. Edelstein, and William J. Chopik (2014), who compared respondents expressing interest in consensual non-monogamy drawn from the general population to those drawn from online communities devoted to discussing positive aspects of non-monogamy. In particular, it was noted that individuals with inclinations toward consensual non-monogamy in the general population sample were robustly correlated with having an avoidant attachment pattern.

See also

Notes

  1. Fry breaks up with Colleen and becomes the messenger of Yivo after he states that their relationship is not working out.
  2. Dashawn Manheim, Steve Mannheim, Jose Guerrero, Cupe Robinson III, Otto Zilberschlag, Arturo "Ice Man" Fonzerelli, Gregory Hsung, and Quackers McQuack

References

  1. Sheff, Elisabeth (2016). When Someone You Love Is Polyamorous: Understanding Poly People and Relationships. Portland, Oregon: Thorntree Press.
  2. ^ Haritaworn, J.; Lin, C.-j.; Klesse, C. (August 15, 2016). "Poly/logue: A Critical Introduction to Polyamory". Sexualities. 9 (5): 515–529. doi:10.1177/1363460706069963. S2CID 145274479. "Polyamory describes a form of relationship where it is possible, valid and worthwhile to maintain (usually long-term) intimate and sexual relationships with multiple partners simultaneously."
  3. ^ Klesse, C. (2011). "Notions of love in polyamory—Elements in a discourse on multiple loving". Laboratorium. 3 (2): 4–25. Archived from the original on March 17, 2017. Retrieved December 27, 2016.
  4. "What Does It Mean to Be Polyamorous?". healthline.com.
  5. Miller, Timothy (1999). The 60s communes: hippies and beyond. Syracuse University Press. p. 135. ISBN 978-0-8156-0601-7. Retrieved March 12, 2011.
  6. Pines, Ayala; Aronson, Elliot (1981). "Polyfidelity: An alternative lifestyle without jealousy?". Journal of Family and Economic Issues. 4 (3): 373–392. doi:10.1007/BF01257945.
  7. "Poly glossary". PolyMatchMaker.com. Archived from the original on July 6, 2017. Retrieved June 24, 2017.
  8. Helen Echlin (November 14, 2003). "When two just won't do". The Guardian. Archived from the original on August 27, 2013. Retrieved March 27, 2007.
  9. Schippers, Mimi (2017). Beyond Monogamy: Polyamory and the Future of Polyqueer Sexualities. NYU Press. Archived from the original on August 7, 2017. Retrieved August 6, 2017.
  10. Klesse, C. (August 15, 2016). "Polyamory and its 'Others': Contesting the Terms of Non-Monogamy". Sexualities. 9 (5): 565–583. doi:10.1177/1363460706069986. S2CID 143812369.
  11. Thomas, Melody (April 22, 2019). "Pretty poly: Why non-monogamous relationships are all the rage".
  12. ^ Alan (January 6, 2007). ""Polyamory" enters the Oxford English Dictionary, and tracking the word's origins". Polyamory in the News!. Archived from the original on January 31, 2016. Retrieved January 27, 2016.
  13. The Ravenhearts. "Frequently Asked Questions re: Polyamory". Archived from the original on March 24, 2010. Retrieved July 6, 2011.
  14. "September 2006 update". The OED today. Oxford Dictionaries. September 14, 2006. Archived from the original on December 28, 2015. Retrieved January 27, 2016.
  15. "Definition of polyamory in US English". Oxford Living Dictionaries. Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on January 30, 2018. Retrieved January 29, 2018.
  16. "Definition of polyamory in English". Oxford Living Dictionaries. Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on January 30, 2018. Retrieved January 29, 2018.
  17. "Definition of "polyamory" – English Dictionary". Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary & Thesaurus. Cambridge University Press. Archived from the original on January 30, 2018. Retrieved January 29, 2018.
  18. "Polyamory -- Definition of Polyamory at Dictionary.com". Dictionary.com. 2020. Archived from the original on November 11, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  19. "Polyamory--Definition of Polyamory by Merriam-Webster". Merriam-Webster. 2020. Archived from the original on August 3, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  20. Kassel, Gabrielle (July 24, 2019). "Here's What a Polyamorous Relationship Actually Is—and What It Isn't". Shape magazine. Archived from the original on June 6, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  21. Orfanidis, Georgios A. (December 27, 2019). Leeming, David A. (ed.). Polyamory (Polygamy and Polyandry). Springer. pp. 1–4. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-27771-9_200097-1 – via Springer Link.
  22. Sheff, Elisabeth A. (July 26, 2018). "What Is the Difference Between Polyamory and Polygamy?". Psychology Today. Archived from the original on December 25, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  23. Haupert, M. L.; Gesselman, Amanda N.; Moors, Amy C.; Fisher, Helen E.; Garcia, Justin R. (July 4, 2017). "Prevalence of Experiences With Consensual Nonmonogamous Relationships: Findings From Two National Samples of Single Americans". Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 43 (5): 424–440. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2016.1178675. ISSN 0092-623X. PMID 27096488. S2CID 6855648.
  24. Ficher, Nancy; Seidman, Steven, eds. (2016). "Contesting the Culture of Monogamy". Introducing the New Sexuality Studies (third ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. p. 326.
  25. ^ Weitzman, Geri (2006). "Therapy with Clients Who Are Bisexual and Polyamorous". Journal of Bisexuality. 6 (1–2): 137–164. doi:10.1300/J159v06n01_08. Archived from the original on March 18, 2015. Retrieved December 4, 2006.
  26. Strassberg, Maura I. "The Challenge Of Post-Modern Polygamy: Considering Polyamory" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on May 24, 2006.
  27. McDonald, Dee (2010). "Swinging: Pushing the Boundaries of Monogamy?". Understanding non-monogamies. Barker, Meg., Langdridge, Darren. New York: Routledge. p. 71. ISBN 978-0-203-86980-2. OCLC 574760499.
  28. Brunning, Luke (August 2018). "The Distinctiveness of Polyamory". Journal of Applied Philosophy. 35 (3): 513–531. doi:10.1111/japp.12240.
  29. "Polyamory 101". PolyamoryOnline. 2007. Archived from the original on September 28, 2007. Retrieved April 27, 2007.
  30. "The Chicago School of Professional Psychology" (PDF). ego.thechicagoschool.edu. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 19, 2013. Retrieved August 30, 2015. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; September 19, 2013 suggested (help)
  31. ^ Bennett, Jessica (July 29, 2009). "Polyamory: The Next Sexual Revolution?". Newsweek. Archived from the original on November 4, 2020. Retrieved December 23, 2020.
  32. Newitz, Annalee (July 7, 2006). "Love Unlimited: The Polyamorists". New Scientist. Archived from the original on November 9, 2020. Retrieved December 23, 2020.
  33. Penny, Laurie (August 20, 2013). "Being polyamorous shows there's no 'traditional' way to live". The Guardian. Archived from the original on November 12, 2020. Retrieved December 23, 2020.
  34. Iovine, Anna (April 19, 2020). "What it's like to be polyamorous during the coronavirus quarantine". Mashable. Archived from the original on April 19, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  35. Smith, Gabrielle (August 7, 2020). "9 Ways Non-Monogamous People Are Dealing With the Pandemic". Self. Archived from the original on November 29, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  36. Migdal, Alex (July 24, 2019). "Polyamory during a pandemic? It's complicated". CBC News. Archived from the original on August 9, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  37. Zhu, Jingshu (January 2018). "We're Not Cheaters: Polyamory, Mixed-Orientation Marriage and the Construction of Radical Honesty" (PDF). Social Science. 14 (1). Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  38. Sudeep, Theres (November 28, 2020). "In Bengaluru, many couples are exploring polyamory". Deccan Herald. Bangalore, Karnataka, India. Archived from the original on December 4, 2020. Retrieved December 11, 2020.
  39. Cook, Elaine (December 12, 2005). "Commitment in Polyamory". Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality. 8. Archived from the original on November 27, 2020. Retrieved December 23, 2020.
  40. ^ Klesse, Christian (February 5, 2014). "Polyamory: Intimate practice, identity or sexual orientation?" (PDF). Sexualities. 17 (1–2): 81. doi:10.1177/1363460713511096. S2CID 144546531.
  41. ^ Davidson, Joy (April 16, 2002). "Working with Polyamorous Clients in the Clinical Setting". Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality. 5. Archived from the original on September 19, 2020. Retrieved December 23, 2020. Also delivered to the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality, Western Regional Conference, April 2002.
  42. Slone, Isabel B. (June 9, 2020). "How a polyamorous Toronto man is managing his four romantic relationships remotely". Toronto Life. Archived from the original on July 2, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  43. ^ Bergdall, Melissa K.; Blumer, Markie L. C. (January 2, 2015). "More Than Two: A Practical Guide to Ethical Polyamory, by Franklin Veaux and Eve Rickert". Journal of Feminist Family Therapy. 27 (1): 40–45. doi:10.1080/08952833.2015.1005963. ISSN 0895-2833. S2CID 143233814.
  44. ^ Veaux, Franklin (2014). More than two : a practical guide to ethical polyamory. ISBN 9780991399703. OCLC 878396611.
  45. ^ Sheff, Elisabeth A. (October 14, 2013). "Solo Polyamory, Singleish, Single & Poly". Psychology Today. Archived from the original on December 24, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  46. ^ Dodgson, Lindsay (February 19, 2019). "There's a dark side of polyamory that nobody talks about". Insider. Archived from the original on June 25, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  47. Cook, Elaine (2005). "Commitment in Polyamorous Relationships". Archived from the original on October 4, 2006. Retrieved July 10, 2006.
  48. Zane, Zachary (December 9, 2020). "I'm in a Loving, Committed Relationship. I'm Also Polyamorous". Men's Health. Archived from the original on December 15, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; December 16, 2020 suggested (help)
  49. ^ From PolyOz glossary: "Not in the but very important is the commitment to honesty with all partners, and openly negotiated ground rules." Scm-rpg.com Archived February 27, 2009, at the Wayback Machine
  50. ^ From sexuality.org: "Two of the cultural cornerstones of the polyamory community are honesty and communication: it's expected that you and your existing long-term partner(s) will have talked over what you're comfortable with and what you aren't comfortable with, and that nobody is going around behind anyone else's back."
  51. ^ McCullough, Derek; Hall, David S. (February 27, 2003). "Polyamory – What it is and what it isn't". Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality. 6. Archived from the original on December 10, 2020. Retrieved December 23, 2020.
  52. Street, Mikelle (December 3, 2020). "YungBlud Opens Up About Sexuality, Talks Male Hookups". Out. Archived from the original on December 3, 2020. Retrieved December 14, 2020.
  53. ^ "Glossary of Polyamory Terms". More Than Two. January 22, 2013. Archived from the original on November 20, 2018. Retrieved December 23, 2020.
  54. ^ "Black and Poly Dictionary". Black and Poly. November 13, 2017. Archived from the original on July 1, 2019. Retrieved May 10, 2010.
  55. Attridge, Mark (February 4, 2013). "Jealousy and Relationship Closeness". SAGE Open. 3 (1): 215824401347605. doi:10.1177/2158244013476054.
  56. Sheff, Elisabeth (December 17, 2013). "Jealousy and Compersion with Multiple Partners – How polys deal with jealousy and feel happy when their lover loves someone else". Psychology Today.
  57. ^ "Polyamory Society Glossary". Archived from the original on August 7, 2013. Retrieved December 26, 2006.
  58. "PolyOz | Compersion | Poly Terms and Concepts". Archived from the original on November 1, 2012.
  59. InnKeeper, Joreth. "The Inn Between". Archived from the original on April 10, 2014. Retrieved March 31, 2014.
  60. Anapol, Deborah M (1997). Polyamory: The New Love Without Limits. San Rafael, CA: IntinNet Resource Center. pp. 49–64.
  61. Taormino, Tristan (2008). Opening Up: A Guide to Creating and Sustaining Open Relationships. San Francisco: Cleis Press, Inc.
  62. Shernoff, M (2006). "Negotiated nonmonogamy and male couples" (PDF). Family Process. 45 (4): 407–18. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2006.00179.x. ISSN 0014-7370. PMID 17220111. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 29, 2013.
  63. Fleckenstein, James R.; Cox, Derrell W. (November 18, 2014). "The association of an open relationship orientation with health and happiness in a sample of older US adults". Sexual and Relationship Therapy. 30 (1): 94–116. doi:10.1080/14681994.2014.976997. ISSN 1468-1994. S2CID 144311126. Regression analyses suggest that the factors which predict better health and happiness differ between the general population and those who participate in consensually non-exclusive sexual relationships
  64. Sizemore, Kayla M.; Olmstead, Spencer B. (October 6, 2017). "Willingness of Emerging Adults to Engage in Consensual Non-Monogamy: A Mixed-Methods Analysis". Archives of Sexual Behavior. 47 (5): 1423–1438. doi:10.1007/s10508-017-1075-5. ISSN 0004-0002. PMID 28986760. S2CID 4030065. The final reason given by those in the 'Willing' group was that their engagement in CNM would be a sacrifice for their partner or for their relationship. This group of participants indicated that despite their own lack of desire to engage in CNM, they would be willing to try CNM for their partner or their relationship.
  65. ^ Masters, Robert (2011). Transformation through intimacy : the journey toward awakened monogamy. Berkeley, Calif: North Atlantic Books. pp. 23–25. ISBN 978-1-58394-388-5. OCLC 793850748.
  66. ^ Brunning, Luke (2018). "The Distinctiveness of Polyamory". Journal of Applied Philosophy. 35 (3): 15–16. doi:10.1111/japp.12240. ISSN 0264-3758.
  67. Doheny, Kathleen (November 20, 2007). "The Truth About Open Marriage". WebMD. Archived from the original on August 15, 2020. Retrieved December 27, 2020.
  68. Divilbiss, April (October 2000). "PolyFamily Child Custody Case Ends After 2 Year Battle..." Polyamory Society. Archived from the original on August 26, 2005. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  69. Tweedy, Ann (October 2011). "Polyamory as a sexual orientation". University of Cincinnati Law Review. 79 (4): 1461–1515. Retrieved December 23, 2020.
  70. Keese, Christian (2016). "Marriage, Law and Polyamory. Rebutting Mononormativity with Sexual Orientation Discourse?". Oñati Socio-legal Series. 6 (6): 1348. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  71. Gould, Rebecca Ruth (August 15, 2016). "Love Without Monogamy". OpenDemocracy. Archived from the original on August 29, 2019. Retrieved December 23, 2020.
  72. Feldman, Jamie (December 23, 2020). "This Throuple Made History With Their First Child. Here's What Their Lives Are Like". HuffPost. Archived from the original on March 2, 2021. Retrieved March 13, 2021.
  73. MacDonald, Michael (June 14, 2018). "3 adults in polyamorous relationship declared legal parents by N. L. court". CBC News. Archived from the original on December 24, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  74. Stening, Tanner (July 1, 2020). "Somerville City Council passes ordinance recognizing polyamorous domestic partnerships". masslive. Archived from the original on July 2, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  75. Taliesin, Julia. "Somerville votes to recognize polyamorous domestic partnerships. It is one of the first in nation". MetroWest Daily News, Framingham, MA. Archived from the original on July 1, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  76. McNamara, Audrey (July 3, 2020). "Massachusetts city officially recognizes polyamorous relationships". CBS News. Archived from the original on December 3, 2020. Retrieved December 14, 2020. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; November 7, 2020 suggested (help)
  77. Greenberg, Zoe (July 2, 2020). "Somerville's new polyamory-friendly policy a 'turning point'". Boston Globe. Archived from the original on December 3, 2020. Retrieved December 14, 2020. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; October 25, 2020 suggested (help)
  78. VTD Editor (November 6, 2020). "SCOV Law Blog: Court decides parentage issue in divorce involving polyamory". VTDigger. Archived from the original on November 24, 2020. Retrieved December 14, 2020. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  79. Brown, Elizabeth Nolan (March 10, 2021). "Cambridge Will Recognize Polyamorous Partnerships and Other Domestic Arrangements With More Than 2 Adults". Reason.com. Archived from the original on March 10, 2021. Retrieved March 13, 2021.
  80. "Cambridge City Council meeting - March 8, 2021 - AGENDA". Cambridge Civic Journal. March 8, 2021. Archived from the original on March 8, 2021. Retrieved March 13, 2021. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; March 10, 2021 suggested (help) This is a publication run by a man named Robert Winters, who is a civic watcher of the Cambridge, MA government.
  81. Adams, Diana; Chen, Alexander (March 9, 2021). "Cambridge Becomes 2nd US City to Legalize Polyamorous Domestic Partnerships" (PDF) (Press release). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 9, 2021. Retrieved March 13, 2021.
  82. Levy, Marc (July 28, 2020). "Law acknowledging polyamorous relationships takes step forward, two councillors holding back". Cambridge Day. Archived from the original on November 1, 2020. Retrieved December 14, 2020.
  83. "POR 2020 #180 The City Manager be and hereby is requested to confer with the City of Cambridge Law Department to review the above changes to the language of the Domestic Partnerships Ordinance and report back to the Council. PASSED TO A SECOND READING IN COUNCIL JULY 27, 2020. TO BE ORDAINED ON OR AFTER SEPTEMBER 14, 2020". Cambridge, Massachusetts. 2020. Archived from the original on December 14, 2020. Retrieved December 14, 2020.
  84. Collings, Jesse. "Town Meeting approves domestic partnership for relationships with more than two people". Wicked Local.
  85. Turley, Jonathan (October 3, 2004). "Polygamy laws expose our own hypocrisy". USA Today. Archived from the original on July 22, 2012. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  86. Ruby Deaton Pharr, v. Joyce W. Beck, 554 S.E.2d COA01-3 (North Carolina Court of Appeals November 20, 2001).
  87. Grossman, Joanna (December 16, 2003). "Punishing Adultery in Virginia". Findlaw. Archived from the original on November 27, 2018. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  88. Francoeur, Robert T. (2004). "United States: Interpersonal Heterosexual Behaviors". In Francoeur, Robert T.; Noonan, Raymond J. (eds.). The Continuum Complete International Encyclopedia of Sexuality. London: A&C Black. p. 1205-1206. ISBN 9780826414885.
  89. Constantine, Larry L. (1974). Group Marriage: A Study of Contemporary Multilateral Marriage. Collier Books. ISBN 978-0020759102.
  90. Crawford, Alison (September 14, 2016). "Canadian polyamorists face unique legal challenges, research reveals". CBC. Archived from the original on December 24, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  91. Martinez, Michelle (2014). "Polygamy". In Ganong, Lawrence H.; Coleman, Marilyn J. (eds.). The Social History of the American Family: An Encyclopedia. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications. p. 1048. ISBN 1452286159.
  92. ^ "Polyamory Day - Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Association".
  93. Sheff, Elisabeth A. (January 18, 2014). "The Five Most Common Legal Issues Facing Polyamorists". Psychology Today. Archived from the original on December 24, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  94. Anapol, Deborah (2012). Polyamory in the 21st Century: Love and Intimacy with Multiple Partners. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 9781442200227.
  95. Den Otter, Ron. "Three May Not Be a Crowd: The Case for a Constitutional Right to Plural Marriage". Emory Law Journal. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 30, 2015. Retrieved June 27, 2015.
  96. McCormick, Joseph (May 1, 2015). "Natalie Bennett is 'open' to polyamorous marriages and civil partnerships". PinkNews. Archived from the original on June 20, 2015. Retrieved June 20, 2015.
  97. Holehouse, Matthew (May 1, 2015). "Greens 'open' to three-person marriage, says Natalie Bennett". Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on March 16, 2018. Retrieved June 20, 2015.
  98. Ashton, Emily (May 1, 2015). "The Green Party Is "Open" To Legalising Three-Way Marriages". BuzzFeed. Archived from the original on December 24, 2016. Retrieved June 20, 2015.
  99. Barrett, Redfern (May 4, 2015). "Comment: Why polyamorous marriages are the next step to equality". PinkNews. Archived from the original on July 2, 2015. Retrieved June 20, 2015.
  100. Reynolds, Daniel (June 15, 2017). "Three Gay Men Make History by Marrying in Colombia". The Advocate. Archived from the original on June 16, 2017. Retrieved June 16, 2017.
  101. Brodzinski, Sibylla (July 3, 2017). "Colombia legally recognises union between three men". The Guardian. Archived from the original on September 13, 2018. Retrieved September 13, 2018.
  102. Taylor-Coleman, Jasmine (July 20, 2017). "Polyamorous marriage: Is there a future for three-way weddings?". BBC News. Archived from the original on December 24, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  103. Dryden, J. Boone (2015). "This Is the Family I Chose: Broadening DomesticPartnership Law to Include Polyamory". Hamline University's School of Law's Journal of Public Law and Policy. 36 (1): 162–188. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  104. Brake, Elizabeth (2013). "Recognizing Care: The Case for Friendship and Polyamory". Syracuse Journal of Law & Civic Engagement. 14 (1). Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  105. Emens, Elizabeth F. (2004). "Monogamy's Law: Compulsory Monogamy and Polyamorous Existence". New York University Review of Law & Social Change. 29: 280–283. Retrieved December 23, 2020.
  106. Belien, Paul (September 26, 2005). "First Trio "Married" in The Netherlands". Brussels Journal Online. Archived from the original on October 4, 2005. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  107. Ewout van der Staaij. "Huwelijk wordt steeds verder opgerekt". refdag.nl. Archived from the original on March 19, 2009. Retrieved March 13, 2018.
  108. Finnish Sex Survey 1992 Archived September 10, 2008, at the Wayback Machine (PDF)
  109. Kassel, Gabrielle (October 30, 2020). "What To Know About Vee Relationships, the Polyamorous Structure Some People Swear By". Well + Good. Archived from the original on November 1, 2016. Retrieved December 24, 2020. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; November 1, 2020 suggested (help)
  110. "What Psychology Professionals Should Know About Polyamory". polyamory.org. Archived from the original on April 9, 2005. Retrieved March 26, 2005.
  111. Kavanagh, Jess (September 19, 2020). "Building bridges: How polyamory made me a better friend, lover and person". Irish Times. Archived from the original on October 3, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  112. Cole, Samantha (March 12, 2021). "Google Play Store Suspends Polyamory Dating App". Vice.com. Archived from the original on March 13, 2021. Retrieved March 13, 2021.
  113. Foster, Lawrence (January 2010). "Free Love and Community: John Humphrey Noyes and the Oneida Perfectionists". In Pitzer, Donald E. (ed.). America's Communal Utopias. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press. p. 253–278. ISBN 0807846090.
  114. Stoehr, Taylor (1979). Free Love in America: A Documentary History. New York: AMS Press, Inc. ISBN 9780404160340.
  115. Herrick, Tirzah Miller; Fogarty, Robert S. (2000). Fogarty, Robert S. (ed.). Desire and Duty at Oneida: Tirzah Miller's Intimate Memoir. Bloomington Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. ISBN 9780253213624. OCLC 247762494.
  116. Chmielewski, Wendy E. (2001). "Review of Desire and Duty at Oneida: Tirzah Miller's Intimate Memoir". Utopian Studies. 12 (1): 176–178. ISBN 9780815621690. JSTOR 20718260. OCLC 5542766034.
  117. "Multiple intimate relationships: a summary of liberated Christians' views". Liberated Christians. Archived from the original on October 15, 2015. Retrieved August 25, 2015.
  118. Meyer, Holly (August 29, 2017). "More than 150 evangelical religious leaders sign 'Christian manifesto' on human sexuality". USA Today. Archived from the original on August 30, 2017. Retrieved August 30, 2017.
  119. Meyer, Holly (August 30, 2017). "What is the Nashville Statement and why are people talking about it?". USA Today. Archived from the original on August 31, 2017. Retrieved August 31, 2017.
  120. Goldstein, Sarah (February 2007). "A Modest Proposal for the "Vanishing American Jew"". Heeb Magazine. Archived from the original on November 12, 2020. Rabbi Jacob Levin, 62, is an exception. When he came out to his synagogue's board seven years ago, his disclosure was met with a mix of confusion and dismay. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; August 19, 2020 suggested (help)
  121. Teutsch, David (2011). A Guide to Jewish Practice: Volume 1 – Everyday Living. RRC Press. pp. 217–227. ISBN 978-0938945185.
  122. "Polyamorous Jews seek acceptance". Haaretz. Jewish Telegraphic Agency. October 12, 2013. Archived from the original on March 19, 2015. Retrieved November 21, 2014.
  123. Lavin, Talia (March 10, 2013). "Married and dating: Polyamorous Jews share love, seek acceptance". Jewish Telegraphic Agency. Archived from the original on October 12, 2013. Retrieved June 16, 2017.
  124. "Married and dating: Polyamorous Jews share love, seek acceptance". Jewish Telegraphic Agency. October 10, 2013. Archived from the original on October 12, 2013. Retrieved October 13, 2013.
  125. Hoffman, Lawrence, ed. (1997). My People's Prayer Book: The Sh'ma and its blessings. Jewish Lights Publishing. p. 69. ISBN 9781879045798.
  126. "Founding Family: "Morality" versus Same-Sex Marriage". Church of Satan. Archived from the original on October 27, 2013. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  127. ^ "UUPA website". Archived from the original on December 5, 2019. Retrieved December 17, 2019.
  128. "Unitarian Universalist Association: Rule II, Section C-2.3.: Non-discrimination". Archived from the original on May 18, 2015.
  129. "SEXUAL ETHICS FOR THE 21st CENTURY". humanisticrabbis.
  130. "History of NCSF". National Coalition for Sexual Freedom. 2020. Archived from the original on December 24, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  131. Weitzman, Geri; et al. (2009). What psychotherapists should know about polyamory (PDF). Baltimore, Maryland: National Coalition for Sexual Freedom. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 26, 2013. Retrieved September 8, 2010.
  132. Adrianne L. Johnson (2010). "Counseling the Polyamorous Client: Implications for Competent Practice" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on December 24, 2020. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; December 25, 2020 suggested (help)
  133. David M. Ortmann; Richard A. Sprott (November 15, 2012). Sexual Outsiders: Understanding BDSM Sexualities and Communities. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 137–. ISBN 978-1-4422-1737-9.
  134. "Kink Aware Professionals (KAP) – Sex-Positive Support for Kink and Nonmonogamy".
  135. "Welcome to the New Kink And Poly Aware Professionals Directory (KAP)". Kink Aware Professionals (KAP).
  136. "Polyamory-Friendly Professionals Directory: Search". www.polyfriendly.org. Retrieved March 26, 2021.
  137. Cowsill, Alan; Irvine, Alex; Korte, Steve; Manning, Matt; Wiacek, Win; Wilson, Sven (2016). The DC Comics Encyclopedia: The Definitive Guide to the Characters of the DC Universe. DK Publishing. p. 284. ISBN 978-1-4654-5357-0.
  138. ^ Century, Sara (October 18, 2018). "Why Starfire's polyamory matters". Syfy Wire. Archived from the original on February 3, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  139. Schenkel, Katie (June 24, 2016). "The Case For Pansexual Starfire [Pride Week]". ComicsAlliance. Archived from the original on February 3, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  140. Yadao, Jason S. (2009). The Rough Guide to Manga. London: Rough Guides. p. 178. ISBN 9781858285610.
  141. Handlen, Zack (June 25, 2015). "Futurama: "A Taste Of Freedom"/"Bender Should Not Be Allowed On Television"". The A.V. Club. Archived from the original on November 4, 2019. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  142. O'Connor, Stuart (May 16, 2008). "Futurama: The Beast With a Billion Backs (DVD)". ScreenJabber. Archived from the original on June 4, 2017. Retrieved December 24, 2020. Fry decides to move in with Colleen ...after making the horrifying discovery that he is merely one of the five boyfriends she shares her apartment with.
  143. Callan, Jonathan (June 25, 2008). "REVIEW - Futurama: The Beast with a Billion Backs". CBR. Archived from the original on August 1, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020. The first act parallels the rip in space with the introduction of Fry's new girlfriend, Colleen (voiced by Brittany Murphy), whom Fry soon discovers has four **other** boyfriends. This serves as a thematic lead-in to the plot that tackles notions of polygamous love head-on...It's in the third act, where humanity moves in with Yeevo, that the film really becomes something special...after being exposed as a randy bachelor, Yevo confesses: "Granted, at first I wished only to bang out a cheap one with your universe. But it's your own fault. Your universe dresses provocatively.""
  144. Handlen, Zack (August 27, 2015). "Futurama: The Beast With A Billion Backs". The A.V. Club. Archived from the original on December 25, 2019. Retrieved December 24, 2020. ...while it's neat for Fry's relationship to Colleen to eventually end with Yivo deciding Colleen, with her group relationships, is the only person to really understand him, that doesn't make Colleen into a better written character, and it doesn't make Fry's romantic struggles more interesting in their own right.
  145. ^ Stepaniuk, Casey (November 16, 2016). "8 Books with Queer Polyamorous Characters". Book Riot. Archived from the original on August 1, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  146. "Meet the polyamorists – a growing band of people who believe". The Independent. October 22, 2011. Archived from the original on December 24, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  147. Igarashi, Hayley (March 25, 2014). "The ABCs of Doccubus, TV's Steamy Succubus Romance". Zimbio. Archived from the original on June 29, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  148. Liszewski, Bridget (March 12, 2018). "Lost Girl's Anna Silk is Eager to Reunite with Cast Mates and Meet Fans at ClexaCon 2018". The TV Junkies. Archived from the original on October 7, 2018. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  149. Newitz, Annalee (February 22, 2010). "Is Caprica the Big Love Of Science Fiction?". Retrieved March 15, 2021.
  150. Juzwiak, Rich (June 26, 2013). "Showtime's Polyamory Is Trashy, Profound and the Best Reality Show on TV". Gawker. Archived from the original on January 23, 2013. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  151. Fraser, Jeff (September 21, 2012). "Polyamory: Exploring the ins and outs of multiple partners". The Globe and Mail. Archived from the original on October 28, 2018. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  152. "Polyamory: Married & Dating official website". Showtime. 2020. Archived from the original on April 22, 2018. Retrieved August 1, 2020.The cast and characters pages also notes that Kamala, Tahl and are bisexual.
  153. Wong, Britany (January 5, 2017). "10 Comics That Show What Polyamorous Love Is Really Like". HuffPost. Archived from the original on February 8, 2019. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  154. Hanks, E. A. (November 19, 2015). "'American Horror Story' Season 5, Episode 7: Gods and Monsters". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on November 28, 2017. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  155. Byrne, Catie (June 26, 2016). "The Gay and Wondrous Life of Caleb Gallo". The Carolinian (newspaper). Archived from the original on August 1, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020. Dubbed by fans as the "throuple scene," this unusual sort of tit for tat homoerotic and polyamorous sexuality encapsulates the dynamic humor and sexual fluidity between characters on the show.
  156. Horowitz, Steven J. (June 26, 2016). "Chatting With "Gay and Wondrous Life of Caleb Gallo" Creator Brian Jordan Alvarez". Paper Magazine. Archived from the original on October 24, 2019. Retrieved December 24, 2020. I never want to be monogamous and I'm always falling into this super lovey-dovey kind of love with guys, and then they think that it's implied monogamy when in fact, the texture of my love is monogamous, but my mental and sexual desires are polyamorous.
  157. Ari North (wa). "Here Goes Nothing" Always Human, vol. 2, no. 69 (April 7, 2017). Webtoon.
  158. Rosi, Kämpe (September 11, 2015). "Cast". Unknown Lands the comic series. Archived from the original on February 22, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  159. otterchild (September 23, 2016). "Backstage Pass September: Rosi Kampe". The Strip Show, a Webcomic Revue. Archived from the original on February 2, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  160. Smith, Anna (November 16, 2017). "How movies brought polyamory into the mainstream". The Guardian. Archived from the original on June 16, 2019. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  161. Clare, Cassandra (July 11, 2015). "Hi Cassie, I wanted to say thank you for these..." Cassandra Clare's official Tumblr. Archived from the original on May 30, 2017. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  162. Clare, Cassandra (July 18, 2015). "Clockworks and triads". Cassandra Clare's official Tumblr. Archived from the original on July 18, 2015. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  163. K. Ancrum (2020). "Author F.A.Q". K. Ancrum's official website. Archived from the original on October 2, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  164. Sugar, Rebecca (director), Jones-Quartey, Ian (Writer), Brewster, Miki (Writer), Abrams, Lamar (Writer) (September 2, 2019). Steven Universe: The Movie [Steven Universe: The Movie] (TV Movie). United States: Cartoon Network. Event occurs at 8 PM. B07W8HR413. Archived from the original (Prime video) on December 31, 2019. Retrieved December 31, 2019.
  165. ^ Brown, Tracy (July 21, 2017). "'Steven Universe's' Rebecca Sugar confirms Fluorite is a representation of a polyamorous relationship". L.A. Times. Archived from the original on December 31, 2019. Retrieved December 31, 2019.
  166. ^ Kelley, Shamus (August 1, 2017). "Steven Universe: 9 Things We Learned". Den of Geek. Archived from the original on December 31, 2019. Retrieved December 31, 2019.
  167. slai (August 9, 2017). "SDCC 2017: The "Steven Universe" Panel". Anime Superhero. Archived from the original on December 31, 2019. Retrieved December 31, 2019.
  168. Nickalls, Sammy (September 21, 2017). "The Tricky Problem With Hollyhock in 'BoJack Horseman' Season 4". Dot and Line. Archived from the original on March 27, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020. The adopted daughter of eight polyamorous fathers, she informs him right off the bat that she's not looking for a ninth dad in BoJack—who, thanks to the results of a Todd-facilitated DNA test, she believes to be her biological father.
  169. Novick, Ilana (April 10, 2017). "TV Is Finally Starting to Get Polyamory Right". Vice News. Archived from the original on May 7, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  170. Mangan, Lucy (November 4, 2018). "Altered States: Love Without Limits review – Louis Theroux treads his tightrope". The Guardian. Archived from the original on November 7, 2018. Retrieved November 7, 2018.
  171. Lao, Sameer (November 17, 2017). "A Black Queer Couple Candidly Explores Polyamory in '195 Lewis'". ColorLines. Archived from the original on April 17, 2019. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  172. Rachel Montpelier. "2018 Gotham Awards: Wins for Chloé Zhao's "The Rider," "Killing Eve," Elsie Fisher, & More". Women and Hollywood. Archived from the original on November 28, 2018. Retrieved November 27, 2018.
  173. "195 Lewis Online Premiere!! — 195 Lewis". 195lewis.com. November 16, 2017. Archived from the original on November 27, 2018. Retrieved November 27, 2018.
  174. Mirk, Sarah (January 30, 2019). "Erotic Sci-Fi Graphic Novel "Open Earth" Explores Polyamory In Space" (Online). Interviewed by Isabel. Bust. Archived from the original on January 30, 2019. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  175. "Trigonometry". BBC News. Archived from the original on December 24, 2020. Retrieved August 27, 2020.
  176. "When is polyamory drama Trigonometry on BBC Two? What is it about?". Radio Times. March 15, 2020. Archived from the original on December 24, 2020. Retrieved August 27, 2020.
  177. "Metamour Day is February 28!". National Coalition for Sexual Freedom. 2020. Archived from the original on July 30, 2020. Retrieved December 26, 2020.
  178. "When you have 2 lovers, the holidays can be tricky". www.theconversation.com.
  179. staff, Renee Yan, The Shorthorn. "Studies find polyamory appeals to some". The Shorthorn.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  180. Alan M. (November 11, 2010). "Polyamory in the News: As Canadian poly case nears, publicity ramps up". Polyinthemedia. Archived from the original on December 24, 2020. Retrieved April 29, 2020.
  181. "About". Polyadvocacy.ca. Archived from the original on December 24, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  182. Marshall, Jason (February 6, 2013). "Polyamorists set up lobby group".
  183. "Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition". Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition.
  184. "Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition". www.facebook.com.
  185. Ben Udashen (March 2, 2019). "Content Warning: Bunker w/ Yasmin Nair (3.2.19)". Unpopular Front (Podcast). Listen Notes. Archived from the original on December 27, 2020. Retrieved December 27, 2020.
  186. Nair, Yasmin (January 19, 2012). "Newt Gingrich: Polyamorist?". Yasmin Nair's official website. WordPress. Archived from the original on December 27, 2020. Retrieved December 27, 2020.
  187. Nair, Yasmin (June 28, 2015). "Your Sex Is Not Radical". Yasmin Nair's official website. WordPress. Archived from the original on June 23, 2020. Retrieved December 27, 2020.
  188. Nair, Yasmin (November 15, 2015). "On Power Couples". Yasmin Nair's official website. WordPress. Archived from the original on December 27, 2020. Retrieved December 27, 2020.
  189. Nair, Yasmin (November 23, 2015). "Weekly Roundup: November 22". Yasmin Nair's official website. WordPress. Archived from the original on December 27, 2020. Retrieved December 27, 2020.
  190. Nair, Yasmin (February 14, 2008). "Friendship in the Time of Love". Yasmin Nair's official website. WordPress. Archived from the original on November 1, 2020. Retrieved December 27, 2020.
  191. Nair, Yasmin (February 12, 2019). "Polyamory Is Gay Marriage for Straight People". Yasmin Nair's official website. WordPress. Archived from the original on December 27, 2020. Retrieved December 27, 2020. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; November 14, 2020 suggested (help)
  192. Bindel, Julie (August 26, 2013). "Rebranding polyamory does women no favours". The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 27, 2020. Retrieved December 27, 2020.
  193. Frost, Daniel; Boyd, Hal (January 7, 2010). "The Counterfeit 'Honesty' of Polyamory". National Review. Archived from the original on December 27, 2020. Retrieved December 27, 2020.
  194. Friedersdorf, Conor (July 9, 2015). "The Case Against Encouraging Polygamy". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on December 27, 2020. Retrieved December 27, 2020.
  195. ^ Rubel, Alicia N.; Bogaert, Anthony F. (September 4, 2014). "Consensual Nonmonogamy: Psychological Well-Being and Relationship Quality Correlates". The Journal of Sex Research. 52 (9): 961–982. doi:10.1080/00224499.2014.942722. ISSN 0022-4499. PMID 25189189. S2CID 36510972.
  196. Moors, Amy; Conley, Terri; Edelstein, Robin; Chopik, William (2014). "Attached to monogamy? Avoidance predicts willingness to engage (but not actual engagement) in consensual non-monogamy". Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 32 (2): 222–240. doi:10.1177/0265407514529065. ISSN 0265-4075. S2CID 146417288.

Further reading

External links

Polyamory-related media

Polyamory-related media coverage

Research and articles

Links to related articles
Interpersonal relationships
Types
Romantic
Non-monogamy
Casual sex
Non-romantic
Historical
Events
Emotions
Practices
Abuse
See also
Close plural relationships
By type
History and culture
LDS/FLDS
Terms
Human sexuality and sexology
Sexual relationship
phenomena
Sexual dynamics
See also
Outline of human sexuality
Physiology
and biology
Health and
education
Identity and diversity
Law
History
Relationships
and society
By country
Sexual activities
Sex industry
Religion and
sexuality
Gender and sexual identities
Gender
identities
Genders
Third genders
and sexes
Sexual
orientation
identities
Sexual orientations
Alternative labels
Social aspects
Other
See also
Bisexuality
Sexual identities
History
Study
Attitudes
Community
Organizations
Lists
LGBTQ topics
Symbols
Pride flags
Gender identity
Third sex / Third gender
Sexual identities
Sexual orientations
Related
History
LGBTQ history
Pre-modern era
16th to 19th century
20th century
21st century
LGBTQ rights by country or territory
LGBTQ rights topics
LGBTQ rights movements
Sexual orientation — Medicine, science and sexology
Societal attitudes
Prejudice and discrimination
Violence against LGBTQ people
Categories: