Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 14:47, 22 August 2021

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Tambayan Philippines High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. Military history: Asian / Southeast Asia This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Asian military history task force Southeast Asian military history task force Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by thnidu, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 1 February 2014.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors

English grammar and usage

I've started editing for grammar and usage. Most of the issues I've seen so far are probably non-native errors, mostly use of the present or perfect tense instead of the past: e.g., "is" or "has been" instead of "was". I'm partway through the Origins section, but have to quit for the night. To be resumed. (diff) --Thnidu (talk) 03:25, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Finished at last. It ain't perfect, but nothing ever is. (diff) --Thnidu (talk) 08:22, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

W:NPOV and other issues

The article is currently bias to leftist views. Leftist subjective analysis is presented as facts such as Manuel Roxas allegedly erroneous reasoning for fighting against the Huk rebellion. Overall the whole article leans towards leftist views. Plus the current layout of the article including citation style looks like an essay. The article needs some work.--203.215.121.157 (talk) 06:07, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

This article remains a PR for the Hukbalahap. These were Stalinists. The Philippines probably would have been no worse of than under Marcos but no better either. This badly needs alternative sources to give some balance.Dejvid (talk) 14:47, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Scope

Reading the article, it seems that it encompasses the entirety of the Hukbalahap's activities from 1942-1954. However, should we include the Second World War as part of the Huk Rebellion? Most sources I've read on the subject (Agoncillo, Saulo, Lanzona, and even Kerkvliet, which seems to be the primary source of this article) differentiate between the Hukbalahap of the Second World War vs. the Huk Insurrection.

One can also argue that the actions of the Hukbalahap during the Second World War aren't the same as its actions during the Third Republic. During the war it was a force created as a united front against the invading Japanese; not necessarily as a rebel army. It was only after the events of the 1946 election, coupled with mounting unrest in Central Luzon that the Huks rose again, this time as an armed body with the intention of rebelling against the Philippine government.

My proposal, therefore, is to split the article. Move the information about the Huk's activities during the Second World War to the Hukbalahap page, or, more appropriately, Philippine resistance against Japan, and keep this article as exclusively about the Huk insurrection proper, from 1946-1954. Would greatly appreciate everyone's opinion on this though. NyanThousand (talk) 07:11, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Very strong support for focusing on post-WW2 conflict. I wasn't aware of the 1946–49 war until just now; but the inclusion of the 1942–45 hostilities (in the battlebox) instantly struck me as odd and wrong. By way of analogy, it would be akin to the article on the Greek Civil War or the Malayan Emergency (both of which have some of parallels with this war) including the operations by communist partisans against WW2 Axis occupation forces. Grant | Talk 01:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

• All unassessed articles
• Stub-Class Philippine-related articles
• High-importance Philippine-related articles
• WikiProject Philippines articles
• C-Class military history articles
• C-Class Asian military history articles
• Asian military history task force articles
• C-Class Southeast Asian military history articles
• Southeast Asian military history task force articles
• WikiProject templates with unknown parameters
• Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors